RPGWatch Forums
Page 1 of 2 1 2

RPGWatch Forums (https://www.rpgwatch.com/forums/index.php)
-   Dragon Age: Origins (https://www.rpgwatch.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=47)
-   -   Dragon age origins best game ever made? (https://www.rpgwatch.com/forums/showthread.php?t=16813)

Lord Gumblert April 11th, 2012 06:47

Dragon age origins best game ever made?
 
IS DRAGON AGE ORIGINS THE BEST GAME EVER MADE? I THINK SO


discuss your thoughts and opinions on this masterpieceof gaming

pros: good combat
cons: storys kinda bland
pros: p. good and convincing characters
cons: the game drags on a bit
pros: good replay value 'cause different origins, parties and decisions alter how the game plays
cons: the items are kinda bland, armor looks kinda bland, need more stuff and stats
pros: origins are good my favourites are dwarves
cons: no gnomes or halflings
pros: you cant finish the game by resolving the dramas that began in the origins. my dwarf is always sad during the game because she got thrown out of her underground home, when rightfully with my newfound powers i should be able to kill the bad guys and take over the city

all in all i say 4 thumbs up out of 5 for bioware. one of their finest games of the decade in my opinion.

"gumblert what r your thoughts on the dlc?"

well, the only worthwhile dlc is the one that comes with the game, shale. the other two that are integrated into the main plot are buggy and just give the player free items, not worth the purchase. i havent tried any of the standalone ones.

"what about awakening?"

hi. i've tried playing awakening twice but i cant find the attention span to get very far. one day i will finish it. i have finished dragon age origins 3 times.

I HOPE THIS SHORT REVIEW WAS HELPFUL TO ANYONE STILL ON THE FENCE ABOUT BUYING THIS GAME. IT'S BRILLIANT AND WORTH THE 18.99 (THATS WHAT IT COSTS AT JBHIFI AND GET THIS, IT COMES WITH ALL THE DLC AND AWAKENING ALL ON 1 DISKETTE

Lord Gumblert April 11th, 2012 06:53

this is a follow up post on how i think dragon age could've been better.

heres my new plot design for future dragon ages:

the reptilitrons, lizard-like bronze-age extraterrestrials invade earth by combining mirrors and glass to 'bend time and space'

they'd basically replace the darkspawn which look like the orcs from the lord of the rings movie which i hate.

rossrjensen April 11th, 2012 07:46

Just the other day I decided to start a new game of Dragon Age. I spent most of the day loading the sucker up with mods. It's pretty sweet to revisit with all the fresh content on it! It's too bad Bioware doesn't support modding of the Mass Effect games. The whole universe set-up would be great for adding new missions and content.

To address your question, no, it's not the greatest game ever made (in my opinion of course). It's still very good though. In fact, it gave me a sense of satisfaction and wonderment that I hadn't experienced from a game in a long, long time the first time I beat it. For me:

Strengths:

Great characters
Great writing
Memorable choices

Weaknesses:

Moments of grinding
Generic setting

It's an 'A' quality game to me. I highly suggest people revisit this game with some mods!

TomRon April 11th, 2012 09:27

Huh, I wouldn't even give it an A. To me it's decent at best. Why?

Three classes, few choices. Way inferior to for example Neverwinter Nights 2 which utilize the 3,5 rules of D&D, which are bloody brilliant. Harder to balance of course, but oh them wonderful choices.

Combat was pretty ok, but I would have liked to see more tactical depth instead of spamming certain abilities.

Scaled enemies. I HATE scaling with a passion.

The story was so-so, I thought it started off great but lost interest towards the end.

I want to be able to choose my party, not just who I go into battle with but with who I travel. It increases replay value and simply makes the game more interesting. I don't want followers forced upon me. It works alright in Mass Effect, but that's a halfbreed. DA:O was supposed to be the spiritual successor to Baldurs Gate, a full-blown hardcore party RPG.

To me, it failed utterly in that regard. I actually think I would have enjoyed it more if they'd never mentioned anything about Baldurs Gate in their advertising.

Gaxkang April 11th, 2012 10:40

One of my top 5 best games. But it was clearly a PC game - on consoles it was completely different experience. Also, the class balance was wrong with mages seeing too much love and other classes way too hard to build in comparison (two handed, archer).

Pity Brent Knowles and Dan Tudge are no longer at BioWare, and Gaider seems quite happy to turn it into some comic for the cosplay teen audience. That makes DA:O the last of its kind. Rest in Peace, Dragon Age - but - maybe in 20 years time someone will do an Enhanced Edition on a new engine with new content.

purpleblob April 11th, 2012 11:30

It's one of my favourite but definitely not a best game ever made (let alone best rpg).

pros: well-written companions/minor NPCs/dialogues, interesting origins story, interesting lore/new universe, fairly good C&C

cons: some areas were absolutely long and tedious (for me, Orzamma and Fade comes in mind), plot was cliched and lame (seriously, darkspawn?), too simplified class, dragged on plot

I actually liked Awakening better than Origins - shorter (without dragging on), out of 6 NPCs I liked 4, and story was more interesting imo. 4/5 from me.

Maylander April 11th, 2012 16:27

I'm actually replaying it right now. Not sure how many times I've played through it, but I'm probably nearing 10 or so.

It is definitely an excellent game, one of the best in recent years. I still don't place it above gems like BG or Gothic though. Still, it's not far off. Skyrim, Fallout: New Vegas and Origins (+ Awakening) are probably the only games in the last 5 years or so that I might have to squeeze into my top 10 RPG list.

Zaleukos April 12th, 2012 12:42

Good game, but the character builds ended up pretty dull with limited variety (mage exempted). Character building was one of few things that were significantly improved in DA2.

CrazyIrish April 12th, 2012 15:25

Had some good stuff, but not even remotely close to best game ever. I never even felt compelled enough to finish it.

Zyraxx44 April 25th, 2012 02:08

It's one of my favorite games, but I'm not going to call it the best game ever made.

zakhal September 4th, 2013 10:13

I think its a bit too grindy. I just started to play it again after two years of pause and now Im allready starting to feel the grind. Just yesterday I killed atleast hundred enemies. If I would sum it up I would propably have killed entire armies in this game. Need to check the kill-counter.

Dragon Age goes like this:

1. Go to next room
2. Kill all enemies
3. Loot all shiney
3. Go back to 1.

Single quest can have dozens if not hundred repeats of this loop. It just gets too old. I think i should go back to playing ultima underworld or ultima 7. Those had interesting beliavable locations and battles were not endless.

Or maybe even betrayal at krondor? Hmm. Maybe yes. I never played the sequels.

If I would have to name good modern rpg I would say return to shadowrun. Its not filled with endless encounter-loops. Just wish it had working save-function.

Grangokhan September 13th, 2013 22:28

Neither is Dragon Age: Origins filled with endless encounter loops. I'd say the structure is more like:

1. Enter hub. Talk to people.
2. Find out problem and go to solve it.
3. Que combat encounters.
4. Complete sub-plot and make a major decision about who you're going to side with.

Rinse, repeat. Although I can understand people who hated the long grinding combat of the Deep Roads and The Circle Tower. That wasn't all Origins was composed of however and you could spend as much time talking to people in Ostagar, Ozarmmar or Redcliffe as you could fighting there. For me it was a fair balance save for the Deep Roads and Circle Tower.

While there are three classes, each have several specializations with more added with Awakening allowing for sub classes. I've literally created four different warriors who are each different from one another. My first one was a two handed warrior focusing on damage who eventually leveled up in the templar spec becoming an effective warrior against mages. My second was a sword and shield warrior focusing mainly on being defense. My third was a sword and shield warrior who was a damage dealer and distractor and my forth was an AoE two handed warrior who eventually became a spirit warrior unlocking some rather magical abilities which would deal spirit damage as well as make him immune to most attacks and also enhancing his combat speed with the addition of Blood Thirst. He was based mainly on buffs and activated abilities though.

purpleblob September 26th, 2013 07:05

I hated Deep Roads for constant grinding and also the politics - this can be a compliment, I suppose. I hate politics and dwarves in Dragon Age universe is all about the politics. There's one dialogue I really enjoyed - I think it happens when you side with the prince… one of the town guy says something bad about Lord Harromont (sp?) then says "epic fail". I remember pausing the game, thinking "did I hear that correctly???"

Dasale April 22nd, 2017 01:36

No way DAO is best RPG, for combats and companions it could postulate, never as a whole.

Wisdom April 22nd, 2017 02:26

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dasale (Post 1061447323)
No way DAO is best RPG, for combats and companions it could postulate, never as a whole.

Welcome to 2017 Dasale :)
I suggest you check the forum a little bit more often. You missed about 4 years of gaming.

KaosWarMonk April 22nd, 2017 03:38

Good necro =) Thread title should draw our zombie killers like moths to flame.

On topic… It was good enough that I finished it, which is a somewhat rare for me. I haven't ever been back though so there's some content I've yet to play.

JDR13 April 22nd, 2017 04:35

It's true. DA:O is the best Dragon Age game ever made.

Lolozaur April 22nd, 2017 06:41

holy necro :lol:, tho i would say its definitely in top5 rpgs for me

ronok September 16th, 2017 13:15

Holds up after years, the dialogue is funny but can be serious when it wants to be, the story is a little bit generic…(unite the free people to combat the darkness effectively) but the political thriller aspect of the game makes the story refreshing.

The Characters are cool (although the voice-acting can be better.) and they all have different morals and ideals so your choices actually matter in that way.

The Combat is very much a niche taste for modern rpgs but I like it since its easy to understand and its tactical, its relaxing and its not to hard, although I may inform that playing this game on harder difficulties is not really fun…Since all it does it make the enemies hit harder and become health sponges.

The Quests can be a little bit repetitive if you do multiple playthroughs but you can of course get different outcomes based on your choices, however, some of the quest choices are more-or-less very narrow in terms of morality (Defile Jesus's grave or do not…Kill all the Mages or Save all the mages..)

I must say that they're a lot of details that make the game, almost every companion has a comment about a choice or quest, each one of them have their own personal quest, you can have romances and even have love triangles, its hilarious.

purpleblob September 17th, 2017 11:03

Funny how this thread keeps getting necroed… especially because I don't see anything that makes DA:O so great. It was mediocre game for me, easily forgettable.

Silver September 17th, 2017 11:49

Quote:

Originally Posted by JDR13 (Post 1061447347)
It's true. DA:O is the best Dragon Age game ever made.

Well played sir. ;)

Carnifex October 3rd, 2017 05:37

There was only ever one Dragon Age game, it was released in November of 2009, and it was pretty good. Still have it on the computer, maybe one day a true worthy sequel will happen.

Watchtower October 30th, 2017 03:22

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carnifex (Post 1061474929)
There was only ever one Dragon Age game, it was released in November of 2009, and it was pretty good. Still have it on the computer, maybe one day a true worthy sequel will happen.

Unfortunately there is barely a snowflakes chance in hell of getting a sequel to Dragon Age Origins.

Remember, EA owns it. I'm not sure they even make games anymore, it seems all they make these days is software to sell, in order to sell you virtual goods. At best since it's now actually gambling since what you may get is an unknown (which likely has been balanced according to expected/desired possible profit, just like slot machines etc.)

Even when Dragon Age came out and was so surprisingly good, I suspected it's because it flew under EA's own radar, the moment it was a success and got their attention look what happened to it, look at poor Dead Space from about the same time, that got off lightly by EA standards of today.

Dilvish October 30th, 2017 09:45

The only BioWare games I've played are: BG, BGII, KotOR and ME1. The only ones I enjoyed were BG and BGII.

I also tried MotB, but the wonky controls and ugly art turned me off. (Also, I don't want to study and learn high level D&D 3.5.)

Deleted User November 14th, 2017 09:38

Study and learn? I find D&D 3.5 fun, and like learning it while playing the game, but I don't stress complex rulesets in RPGs. I love to pore over character options, stats, etc., but I also just wing it, learn it a bit as I go and enjoy.

I've never had an RPG where I messed up the character building so bad I could not progress. Just use your RPG Sense skill. Life finds a way, etc.. :)

SpoonFULL November 14th, 2017 13:19

I did not play, or at least pushed my self to continue with, BG and BGII as I am more of a visual person and dislike following an agglomeration of small pixels on the screen during combat.

DA:O was a master-piece for me in writing, dialog, choices and consequences, replayability, atmosphere, locations, characters, weapons, magic, gear and customisation, tactical and visceral combat, sound track, voice overs, and marvellous user interface and controls (on PC). What more can I ask for?

Ripper November 14th, 2017 13:34

I agree that DAO had many strengths, and it's a shame they didn't iterate upon it to create a real classic of a sequel. With the original, good as it was, I found myself getting pretty bored by about half way through, and I think the content could have been more interesting.

Hastar November 14th, 2017 14:11

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fluent (Post 1061481079)
Study and learn? I find D&D 3.5 fun, and like learning it while playing the game, but I don't stress complex rulesets in RPGs. I love to pore over character options, stats, etc., but I also just wing it, learn it a bit as I go and enjoy.

I've never had an RPG where I messed up the character building so bad I could not progress. Just use your RPG Sense skill. Life finds a way, etc.. :)

You must not have played Underrail in the Deep Caverns. If you don't have the hide in shadows or sneak ability you messed up your character build.

I've tried to get thru Dragon Age twice and get too bored about half way thru. Would not make my top 100 RPG's.

Dez November 14th, 2017 14:38

One of the best rpgs I've played. No doubt about this. As a whole there is very little to fault: Good gameplay, plenty of intresting quests, great characters, good choises, well writen dialog & lore and a memorable fantasy story. I don't get the complaints about generic setting. To me it was nothing but generic. Everything just made sense and the world felt very belivable. How the magic, demons and fade worked for instance was very orginal. And I also thought that religion and religious institutions seemed very real. Chantry was obviously the catholic church of Thedas.

And there was the politics side which I found really intriguing back then. Like how religious institutions such as Chantry tried to use their influence on rulers and common folk to mold the world as they see fit. And unlike Purpleblob for instance, I digged dwarven politics a lot. One of the most interesting moral choises I have had to make in rpgs was choosing a new king for dwarves.

Ok few serious spoilers about the game and dwarven storyline & orgins story.

Spoiler – spoilers

NewDArt November 14th, 2017 15:14

Far from the best game in my experience, but still very good.

Deleted User November 20th, 2017 08:01

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ripper (Post 1061481092)
I agree that DAO had many strengths, and it's a shame they didn't iterate upon it to create a real classic of a sequel. With the original, good as it was, I found myself getting pretty bored by about half way through, and I think the content could have been more interesting.

I remember the same happening to me, around the time when you had to visit the various races' home areas. Still, it was decent enough, but ultimately not that memorable for me. I did like aspects of it, though, like the ethereal area (The Fade, I think?), and Shale had some hilarious dialogue. My original playthrough was on console, too, so it was not optimal, and it was also my first RTWP game, so I wonder if the game would seem better after much more experience in that area now if I revisit it.

Still, I'd probably play Drakensang or River of Time instead. NWN/NWN as well, with their large amounts of quality modules. Just installed an NWN 2 Planescape module, actually. Looks pretty interesting. :)

Ripper November 20th, 2017 08:38

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fluent (Post 1061481894)
I remember the same happening to me, around the time when you had to visit the various races' home areas. Still, it was decent enough, but ultimately not that memorable for me. I did like aspects of it, though, like the ethereal area (The Fade, I think?), and Shale had some hilarious dialogue. My original playthrough was on console, too, so it was not optimal, and it was also my first RTWP game, so I wonder if the game would seem better after much more experience in that area now if I revisit it.

Still, I'd probably play Drakensang or River of Time instead. NWN/NWN as well, with their large amounts of quality modules. Just installed an NWN 2 Planescape module, actually. Looks pretty interesting. :)

Yes, as I recall, the early game was pretty good, and then it split into essentially three main quests - a lord with demon-riddled kiddies that led to the Fade, some business in the Deep Roads, and a bit of werewolf mischief in the woods.

One way or the other, I became bored in the midst of it, in a way I didn't with Buldur's Gate and Friends.

Kordanor November 20th, 2017 10:02

River of Time was also great but I think it was a little more clunky and more…"special" than Dragon Age: Origin, it just wasn't as polished. For example the AI in combat was a mess. Drakensang had an aggro system which often lead to a bad chain reaction.
You just moved one character by a meter and the enemies attacking him moved, the characters attacking that enemies moved and so on. And that in a way, as if you just poked into an ant hive.

Also both games had one thing in common: Their DLCs were a horrible mess and a pure money grab without any good content (excluding the 2 Dragon Age DLCs which were available right at release which in itself doesn't speak in favor of the game either though.).

But is Dragon Age Origins the best game? Meh…I wouldn't think so.
Well, personally I am not a fan of RTwP, but that's just a personal opinion.
But the combat often included exploiting the AI or spells with oversights. E.g. casting a spell which didn't require LOS to the enemy. Or you stayed outide of LOS in another room and killed everyone in the door, and then killed the archers which stayed in the other room with AOEs.
The character system wasn't really good either. While you had some decisions in the beginning, near the end you just had every single talent for a character. I remember taking 2h skills for a guy with sword&shield, because there wasnt any other option anymore.
The item system wasn't that interesting either. Mostly replacing a +2 sword with a +3 sword.
And while the story and quests weren't bad, they were too much "as expected" following a clear blueprint. E.g. I remember there were often or always only good or evil/bad decisions. Do you want to let the mother sacrifice herself in a blood ritual for her very important son? If you were reasonable and wanted to guarantee the survival of the son, you might have agreed. But the game considered this as the bad or evil decision.

Personally I'd consider Divinity Original Sin 2 as the clearly better RPG now.
Before that, well, maybe Pillars, though it would be a close race.
Also I prefered Mass Effect 2 over Dragon Age Origin, but as they are very different games, it's rather hard to be objective in that comparison.

Deleted User November 20th, 2017 11:18

Drakensang and River of Time are much lower budget games, so sure, they are "clunkier" and less-produced than Origins. I'd still likely play them both before revisiting Origins. :)

I really liked Drakensang the first time through, and it was more memorable for me than Origins. I didn't have a problem with the combat in Drakensang, but it wasn't quite as Action-RTWP as I remember Origins being. The character system was also vastly superior for my tastes, and just an overall more interesting ruleset and stat system.

It also felt like a 3rd-person Baldur's Gate to me, in a weird way even more so than Origins did. And it has a strong storybook fantasy magic feel.

Haven't played River of Time yet, though. Need to get working on that. :)

NewDArt November 20th, 2017 11:41

I do think DA:O has some of the best writing in the genre, though. I particularly liked all the "Fade" stuff - which is probably why I enjoyed that sequence in the game. Not in terms of gameplay (which was incredibly tedious) - but because the lore regarding all the demons and their relationship with magic was fascinating.

purpleblob November 20th, 2017 11:46

I found DA:O decent in the beginning and towards the ending. Middle chunk is so boring, I keep stop playing once I get to either Brecilian Forest or Orzamma.

Deleted User November 20th, 2017 12:43

Quote:

Originally Posted by NewDArt (Post 1061481908)
I do think DA:O has some of the best writing in the genre, though. I particularly liked all the "Fade" stuff - which is probably why I enjoyed that sequence in the game. Not in terms of gameplay (which was incredibly tedious) - but because the lore regarding all the demons and their relationship with magic was fascinating.

I don't remember specifics too well, but I liked The Fade areas, too. I thought some of the dialogue was really good, too, specifically with Alistair, Morrigan and Shale. But it's been so long since I played that it's a bit fuzzy. I was still pretty much a console gamer when I played it.

joxer November 20th, 2017 13:38

Quote:

Originally Posted by NewDArt (Post 1061481908)
I do think DA:O has some of the best writing in the genre, though. I particularly liked all the "Fade" stuff - which is probably why I enjoyed that sequence in the game. Not in terms of gameplay (which was incredibly tedious) - but because the lore regarding all the demons and their relationship with magic was fascinating.

Knew it. I loved everything in DA:O - except Fade. All about it just made me throw up as it felt as mish mash of ideas about whatever heavy drugs trip whatnot.

That's however exactly what makes DA:O a great game as it has combines different elements for different tastes under it's hood.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kordanor (Post 1061481898)
River of Time was also great but I think it was a little more clunky and more…"special" than Dragon Age: Origin, it just wasn't as polished. For example the AI in combat was a mess. Drakensang had an aggro system which often lead to a bad chain reaction.
You just moved one character by a meter and the enemies attacking him moved, the characters attacking that enemies moved and so on. And that in a way, as if you just poked into an ant hive.

Also both games had one thing in common: Their DLCs were a horrible mess and a pure money grab without any good content (excluding the 2 Dragon Age DLCs which were available right at release which in itself doesn't speak in favor of the game either though.).

Lemme simplify it a bit.
Drakensang games and DA:O share two things in common.
Both are epic RPGs and both are musthave/mustplay.

I love(d) them equally.

Kordanor November 20th, 2017 20:14

Quote:

Originally Posted by joxer (Post 1061481918)
Lemme simplify it a bit.
Drakensang games and DA:O share two things in common.
Both are epic RPGs and both are musthave/mustplay.

Yep, that too. At least River of Time. Didn't like the first Drakensang. And @Fluent: That's also the reason why you should definitely play it, if you liked the first already. The second one just brings big improvements.

Deleted User November 20th, 2017 23:07

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kordanor (Post 1061481989)
And @Fluent: That's also the reason why you should definitely play it, if you liked the first already. The second one just brings big improvements.

Yeah, it looks great. There's just so many games I need to play, it's almost overwhelming, hah.

But I never did finish Drakensang, either. I am very far in the game, basically in the last area. Still have my save there from a year or two ago. Would like to finish it at least and then play River of Time.


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 02:51.
Page 1 of 2 1 2

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
vBulletin Security provided by DragonByte Security (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2022 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2022 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright by RPGWatch