![]() |
But all those things are about mastering the game. And as I said, you cannot really claim making characters is bad if you don't understand the intricate details about the game.
I am only here arguing about objective things you claimed. Maps, trade and all that is subjective and I cannot argue vs that. You either like that part or not. But if PoE is master of one thing, that is making builds. |
Quote:
|
PoE today is a completely different game today than it was 3 or 4 years ago. COMPLETELY.
Any discussion involving that version of the game is pretty much moot. Ie., it's pointless to go back and forth with you on a version of the game that no longer exists. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Personally I would not mind less focus on trading and as a compensation better drop rates for those rarer items. Only objective thing here is if you measure how much time you spend using the existing trade tools vs playing the game itself and comparing that to D2 where trading tools were even worse or D3 AH where trading was made much easier. |
Quote:
I've played PoE since the beta also and the game has gotten better and better. I'd say you haven't completed the game yet if you haven't killed both the Elder in red maps and the Shaper. |
Quote:
|
Path of Exile - The Comment Section of the Undying.
|
I thought this kind of games are heavy about the loot and your character looks, but in PoE all the cool looking gear (compared to Diablo 3) comes from cash shop!
I ran hours and hours and still my character looked like low level bum at max lvl. I understand they must make some money, but I lose enthusiasm to continue to play when I know there is nothing cool I can get from next bosses and levels, except just numbers on my gear. And as far as I remember the gameplay mostly looked like some magic ball (your character) jumps and blasts everything in his way, pressing just one button/skill for whole game - I hardly find it entertaining, so in the end Diablo 3 did it all better for me. |
Quote:
Unlike many here I like ARPGs as much if not more than traditional RPGs- (as an example voice acting and incessant dialogue bores me to tears) while I really enjoy the interaction of loot with different builds,the development of characters and progression, the spontaneous feel of ARPGs, the mystery and excitement of cool drops. I also only play hardcore, I cannot stand dying through content repeatedly in any game but much less in an ARPG. I would rank D3 among the very worst. It essentially has no skill system, the loot is hellishly boring since the Loot 2.0 update, the main story is unplayable, rifts are boring and despite great graphics the levels themselves are uninteresting. Both Grim Dawn and POE are far more interesting and fun to play. The skill and gem system in POE is just brilliant, and the skill system in GD (basically Titan Quest) is great. Part of the fun for me is trying and discovering new builds and approaches to the game. I do NOT and have never understood people just copying other peoples builds. Why even play the game? If I were to rank the ARPGs it would look something like this 1. Divine Divinity 2. Diablo 2 3. Sacred 4. Titan Quest 5. Grim Dawn 6. Path of Exile 7. Torchlight 2 8. Van Helsing 9. Torchlight 1 10. Chronicon I also like Hellgate London, Victor Vran, Silverfall, Sacred 2, and others. D3 would likely be around the 15 spot or less for me. D3 in its original state with the RMAH was maybe one of the worst major release games ever. It was a far better game 4 years earlier in its development at Blizzcon. They had a lot of interesting systems planned and just gutted them all. To those who like ARPGs: Wolcen development is very slow, but in its current state it is showing real promise to be an exceptional ARPG when all is said and down. The improvement in the last 5 months or so had been dramatic. |
Quote:
I think it has the best moment-to-moment gameplay by FAR - and also the most satisfying skill variety of all of them. Every single skill and skill combination just feels great. PoE is ok - but a bit early 2000s in that way. GD is just boring as hell when it comes to combat. I mean, it's servicable and passable - but it can't hold a candle to games that's so clearly on another level of craftsmanship. Then again, I actually care a lot about the experience of playing the game - and I can't enjoy the spreadsheet aspect of a game if the game itself is missing. Diablo 3 isn't perfect, for sure, but it has a visceral gameplay that's completely unmatched by PoE and GD. Which isn't a great surprise. Blizzard tend to have the best craftsmen - and their budgets are much, much larger. Small indie teams can hardly compete when it comes to production values, polish or quality of aesthetics. I'm sure people can tell themselves that, but I find that too unrealistic to take seriously. |
Quote:
Maybe its just its own thing- and Action Combat isometric game. It really is not an ARPG |
Quote:
Kotick had absolutely nothing to do with the RMAH or D3 - that was purely the design team. Blizzard makes more money than God for Activision - and Kotick is smart enough to understand that you should never interfere with a cash cow that good. Personally, I think RMAH was the best thing about D3 and I hated to see it go, but that was for legal reasons. They made it sound like it was for the fans - but if you do a little research, it was obvious why they did it. As for skills being the same - I very much disagree. As I said, I think D3 has the best skill variety of all the game in this genre. They feel different and they have different effects and synergies. That said, D3 doesn't have useless skills like so many other RPGs, if that's what you mean. They actually wanted all skills to have their uses. But that's a Blizzard thing - it's the same in all their games. They keep balancing until all choices can be viable - but they're never equally viable. That's bullshit. But if you want to compete on the highest difficulty levels - you can't just pick random skill setups. You have to gear properly and pick the right combinations. But I agree that PoE and GD both have much more complicated and interesting progression systems. They're just boring as hell to actually play and look at - compared to D3. |
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT +2. The time now is 09:53. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
vBulletin Security provided by
DragonByte Security (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2022 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2022 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright by RPGWatch