A Plague Tale: Innocence - Q&A and Video Review
 

@starnews A Q&A interview with Asobo Studios about A Plague Tale: Innocence. Additionally Rob Cram has reviewed the game.

Thanks Farflame!

More information.

Big company PR idiots are busily pushing this junk down the throat of the force-fed masses.

Not really, no.
The current PR "hits" are some nuclear disaster true story (yea, right) tv show by people who weren't even close nor can read Чернобыл but write Chernobyl instead (why it's not spelled Chernobil?) and 2001 ripoff game where you play HAL called Observation.

Not saying this means I'm buying Plague Tale. Seen some mushroomy gameplay video somewhere. It has automatic buhbye from me.

You are not really playing HAL. You can probably decide… See 1:18 of this video:




Does it mean you wont buy VtmB 2 or Cyberpunk 2077 or Realms Beyond if you will ever see a small glimpse of "gameplay" of these games on console? :)

Actually no. It's not about the platform but about controls.
If I spot XYAB idiocy on screen or kindergarden shapefitting objects insult, then it does.
Autoaim has no place in my home.

then don't buy either because just like this game it will have both gamepad controll options AND mouse options.
This game plays like any other PC game if you use mouse, just like Cyperpunk will..

This is decent game if you like linear, story driven games.. It's (very) similar to Last of Us but not as good when it comes to characters.

I seriously doubt Cyberpunk will have autoaim by default. Especially after CDpr decided it'll play first person.

Plague Tale looks really neat but really short for $45. Guess I'll wish list it for next year.

why would it matter how the gamepad controls are if you're playing with a mouse anyways? Mouse controls never has auto-aim, not in this game, not in any game that i've played with mouse. I'm currently playing this game with a mouse and it's like any other third person 3D game, nothing auto.

Around 12h isn't short imo.. I think LoU is around that too, it felt really long. I actually prefer when games are more in the 10-12h range than in the 20h range because that means tons of useless filler content to drag it out and, usually, bore the player to death.
For RPG's 10-12h might be a bit short though, but it's not a RPG.

Last game I finished - Shadow of the Tomb Raider.
Already posted somewhere, if you set combat difficulty on easy - it autoaims. Even if you're using mouse, it'll autoaim.
Of course I played the game with k+m. Normal difficulty. Because I make headshots easily with the mouse and am not interested in garbage. What matters to me, doesn't have to matter to you, of course, just please don't assume autoaim with mouse doesn't exist. It does and it's called easy.

I don't like when games last less than 40 hours generally, but that doesn't mean I'll hate a short game, Mars War Logs is an example of a shortie I loved.
Filler doesn't have to be a low quality repetition/grind/walkingsim.

It's extremely rare that a game can be interesting for 40h. Most games i quit well before it's over because they couldn't keep it interesting.

Makes sense that a game played on easy is very easy. Again i'm not sure what the problem is, play on medium instead?

The problem is mushrooms are plastic and useless junk and I don't want to pay a single dime for any junk.
When I see a video of a videogame presented with mushrooms junk, I lose interested in it instantly. If I buy a game not realizing it's mushroomsbased, I refund it and thumb it down on steam.

Clear now?