| Superguest |
July 26th, 2008 19:57 |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thomas Riegsecker
We are still unsure about character imports because if we implement this feature, your character will need to be “version adjusted” for the new game which essentially undoes your gains from Book I. Since the game takes place a few years after the events in Book I, we’ll start all players off as a Level 1 character with the realization that without the constant honing of your abilities you’ve become rusty and must rebuild your skills. Fans have overwhelming suggested to us that the building of a character from level 1 is more important than a straight import of a pre-developed character.
|
That's disappointing. I feel importing characters is a great feature not used often enough. Especially in CRPGs, I'd much rather play many different adventures with the same characters like in Pen&Paper RPGs than have a new character and new rules and features in every game.
Now in Eschalon especially it would make sense to play the same character in all games. It's not like the option to import a character from the first game precludes starting a new character from scratch.
I don't see a big issue with "version adjusting" either. I mean, what's the difference? You don't have the new skills? Big deal, make a new character if you want those. Old skills are abandoned? Give the player his skillpoints back.
Heck, even with far-reaching changes to the character development it shouldn't be a a big challenge to "recalculate" the character. Just let the player import his character and make any changes that can't be easily automated on the character creation screen.
I guess the main issue is that this wasn't planned from the start, and many skills are only useful within a limited range, so a high-level character could easily master all skills.
It wouldn't be anathema imo to take an imported character down a few levels - it's certainly not less convincing than the "all the character's abilities have deteriorated to the point where he starts back at level one" excuse.
|