RPGWatch Forums
Page 4 of 4 « First 2 3 4

RPGWatch Forums (https://www.rpgwatch.com/forums/index.php)
-   News Comments (https://www.rpgwatch.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=10)
-   -   Dragon Age - the women of DA in Maxim Magazine - a marketing ploy? (https://www.rpgwatch.com/forums/showthread.php?t=8783)

Myrthos October 28th, 2009 15:27

I would think Patrick is a visitor who enjoys RPG's like everybody else on these forums and likes to discuss them. Him working for Bioware should not exclude him from posting in forums related to Bioware and state his opinion and certainly does not give rights to others to specify what he can and can't write about.

Tan October 28th, 2009 20:01

Quote:

Originally Posted by crpgnut (Post 1060979983)
I would be EXTREMELY interested in reading that instead of Tan's 6000 reasons he hates all things Bioware.

Nobody forces you to read my "6000 reasons why I hate all things bioware". Now, if you had something to do in RL it would be much easier to be selective about what you read on internet forums. Boredom is a nasty thing.

Dhruin October 29th, 2009 00:48

Quote:

Originally Posted by DArtagnan (Post 1060979975)
I'm just saying that if sales are hurt because they made a crappy marketing campaign, then maybe the way to react is to change marketing approach, rather than stopping the development of "deep" CRPGs altogether.

And when sales are great, does that prove the strength of the marketing campaign?

If sales fail, the marketing campaign won't wear the blame. But they won't - even the Bio haters will secretly play this - even while they type their diatribes against David Gaider.

DArtagnan October 29th, 2009 10:13

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dhruin (Post 1060980104)
And when sales are great, does that prove the strength of the marketing campaign?

If sales fail, the marketing campaign won't wear the blame. But they won't - even the Bio haters will secretly play this - even while they type their diatribes against David Gaider.

I'm not responsible for interpreting sales.

I'm saying if the marketing campaign proves to be a mistake, then maybe they shouldn't react as was suggested.

Gaider didn't understand that people had a problem with the campaign, which is why his point was illogical. That's what I was pointing out.

I have no reason to play this in secret, and I don't hate anyone. I'm expecting this to be a middling to very good game - and I'm almost certainly going to buy it.

You're just biased against anyone who doesn't agree with you, as per usual

Gorath October 29th, 2009 13:07

Everything about EA NA's DA marketing has been said. Here and in several threads over the couple of months. There's no need to repeat it again.

Thread closed.

Dhruin October 29th, 2009 14:10

Quote:

Originally Posted by DArtagnan (Post 1060980152)
I have no reason to play this in secret, and I don't hate anyone. I'm expecting this to be a middling to very good game - and I'm almost certainly going to buy it.

You're just biased against anyone who doesn't agree with you, as per usual

I won't get into the last bit but I wasn't accusing you of being one of the haters. It was a general comment.


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 12:34.
Page 4 of 4 « First 2 3 4

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
vBulletin Security provided by DragonByte Security (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2022 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2022 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright by RPGWatch