RPGWatch Forums

RPGWatch Forums (https://www.rpgwatch.com/forums/index.php)
-   News Comments (https://www.rpgwatch.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=10)
-   -   Avernum 6 - Windows Release (https://www.rpgwatch.com/forums/showthread.php?t=9980)

woges February 26th, 2010 03:19

Avernum 6 - Windows Release
 
Avernum 6 Version 1.0 is out for Windows there's also a demo to check out.
Quote:

Avernum 6 is now available for both Windows and Macintosh! And rest of description is same! At last, the epic Avernum saga comes to an end. The subterranean world of Avernum is being ravaged by famine and barbarian invaders. Explore the enormous underworld, full of dungeons, powerful artifacts, and cunning foes. Go forth and determine the final destiny of your people! Come get the huge, free demo.
More information.

Daroou February 26th, 2010 04:09

I just picked up the Titan Quest bundle for $5 on steam. Avernum is $28. Is it really worth that much if I have other games to play?

txa1265 February 26th, 2010 04:59

Quote:

Originally Posted by Daroou (Post 1061000536)
I just picked up the Titan Quest bundle for $5 on steam. Avernum is $28. Is it really worth that much if I have other games to play?

Titan Quest is an old and out of print game by a defunct publisher … I fail to get the comparison … I mean, Dragon Age and Mass Effect still sell for $65 with less game time than Avernum 6.

If you don't have the time to play, hold off.

crpgnut February 26th, 2010 06:39

Of course Titan Quest, even though old itself, has blazingly good graphics compared to Avernum. I'd say if you can live with really, really, bad graphics and a land that is mostly rehashed since the mid-90's then Avernum is for you. If not, don't bother. I wouldn't be surprised if Erika is STILL around. Some people like familiar places and characters, Jeff absolutely goes to that well ALL the time :D

Caveat: I gave up on Avernum after 3. I gave up paying for Jeff's games about the same time. I do occasionally download the demos, but the gameplay is nearly identical to all the other games, so I never even finish that portion.

JemyM February 26th, 2010 07:58

If I was forced I would still pick Avernum over Titan Quest.

I played Titan Quest on lan with my wife and eventually I had to ask her if we could stop, not even playing it together could hide the fact that it was a really boring game for me. All you do is just walk forward and kill whatever pops up, there's barely no story to speak about, the quest structure is oversimplified. Like other diablo clones, the game is built exclusively on gathering loot and earning experience points. Sure, if one like that kind of stuff you get it in TQ, but if you are looking for a roleplaying experience I would go with Avernum.

Dhruin February 26th, 2010 09:33

Quote:

Originally Posted by crpgnut (Post 1061000556)
Caveat: I gave up on Avernum after 3. I gave up paying for Jeff's games about the same time. I do occasionally download the demos, but the gameplay is nearly identical to all the other games, so I never even finish that portion.

We have this conversation nearly every time. I completely understand your opinion - even though I don't agree.

But presumably Darou hasn't ever played any of Jeff's games, or he'd have an opinion as to their value (like you do). So, it's completely irrelevant if they're all the same, because this would still be new to him.

That makes the question: is it worth buying this one Spiderweb game for $28?

My answer: why not find out yourself? There is a large-ish demo. Titan Quest is fun (ish) but it's a hack'slash. For me, a big, traditional, turn-based CRPG is well worth it.

ikbenrichard February 26th, 2010 09:34

awesome news !!

ordering right now !!

KasperFauerby February 26th, 2010 10:22

My god, that man is a clockwork :) He said (about windows users): "I should have something for you around march…".

Great news, and well done Jeff!

Benedict February 26th, 2010 12:24

w00t! Nice to see a developer sticking to or even beating his timetable :)

coaster February 26th, 2010 12:59

I'd rather stare at my desktop than play TQ. I occasionally buy Diablo clones (TQ, Sacred) then uninstall about 2 hours into them because I am sooooo bored of the relentless, endless clicky combat.

I thoroughly enjoyed Avernum 1-3 (haven't played the later ones) and despite the simplicity of the graphics, hideous character portraits etc would rate them far more highly than TQ and their ilk.

Benedict February 26th, 2010 15:30

Quote:

Originally Posted by coaster (Post 1061000596)
I'd rather stare at my desktop than play TQ. I occasionally buy Diablo clones (TQ, Sacred) then uninstall about 2 hours into them because I am sooooo bored of the relentless, endless clicky combat.

I thoroughly enjoyed Avernum 1-3 (haven't played the later ones) and despite the simplicity of the graphics, hideous character portraits etc would rate them far more highly than TQ and their ilk.

Can't speak for Avernum 6 but Avernum 5 took a big leap forward IMO, added a good range of skills for fighters making combat a lot more balanced and interesting.

txa1265 February 26th, 2010 15:48

Quote:

Originally Posted by KasperFauerby (Post 1061000578)
My god, that man is a clockwork :) He said (about windows users): "I should have something for you around march…".

Great news, and well done Jeff!

Well, to his benefit the beta process went *amazing* … he was very exacting during the Mac beta (yes I was fortunate enough to do both) and as a result the issues that came up for me in the Windows beta were really small and picky stuff.

rune_74 February 26th, 2010 16:09

Quote:

Originally Posted by txa1265 (Post 1061000540)
Titan Quest is an old and out of print game by a defunct publisher … I fail to get the comparison … I mean, Dragon Age and Mass Effect still sell for $65 with less game time than Avernum 6.

If you don't have the time to play, hold off.

Mass Effect 2 and Dragon Age sell for more because they are better games.

woges February 26th, 2010 16:22

Quote:

Originally Posted by rune_74 (Post 1061000630)
Mass Effect 2 and Dragon Age sell for more because they are better games.

With that 'logic' 'better games' should never drop in price which they do.

cutterjohn February 26th, 2010 17:50

Quote:

Originally Posted by txa1265 (Post 1061000540)
Titan Quest is an old and out of print game by a defunct publisher … I fail to get the comparison … I mean, Dragon Age and Mass Effect still sell for $65 with less game time than Avernum 6.

If you don't have the time to play, hold off.

I've gotta disagree here. TQ may be old, but it is still a better polished game than ANY spiderweb game and looks better to boot.

He's just priced himself right on out of the park for his games. Not a single one of them is worth more than $20. (And to use your own argument against you go look at the pricing on his OLD(ancient) games…) His engine's incredibly tired and crufty(never even approaching Ultima VII level, at best being more like Ultima VI's engine), and I actually prefer his older game mechanics from the Exile series along with larger parties.

I gave up on his games after the first Avernum version(a rehash of Exile I no matter what he claims — very little new other than a crappier game mechanics system) and the first Geneforge(just never liked that setting at all and it still used very similar to Avernum mechanics).

The Eschalon games are better and more reasonably priced to boot to compare Spiderweb to another indy…

[EDIT]
To get any sort of value he really needs to get a better bundle pricing like he used to have back when he was doing the Exile games… His games just don't inflate in value like he seems to think.

TQ: Yes. It's a down and dirty ARPG, expect no story just alot of grinding and ph4t 1007.
[/EDIT]

txa1265 February 26th, 2010 18:25

Quote:

Originally Posted by rune_74 (Post 1061000630)
Mass Effect 2 and Dragon Age sell for more because they are better games.

Definitely a matter of opinion.

What *is* factual is that the production costs for Mass Effect 2 and Dragon Age are astronomical compared to most games.

Quote:

Originally Posted by cutterjohn (Post 1061000646)
I've gotta disagree here. TQ may be old, but it is still a better polished game than ANY spiderweb game and looks better to boot.

Polished? Are we takling about the same Titan Quest that was infamous for being a complete buggy mess? Better looking, sure - but again, I paid top dollar for them way back when.

But my point wasn't to compare the quality of games - all I am saying is that comparing prices of old games on deep-discount clearance with a brand new release is the height of stupidity, really. I mean, the original GTA 1 & 2 and Elder Scrolls Arena are all free, so how DARE they charge money for new games?!?!?!

Benedict February 26th, 2010 18:40

Quote:

Originally Posted by cutterjohn (Post 1061000646)
He's just priced himself right on out of the park for his games.

Not really, he's made more than enough of them that there's plenty of people who'll buy at those prices, the losses he'd make by cutting his margins on his core audience just won't get offset by luring in a handful of new customers who'd try the game if it were cheaper.

Especially since he gives out demos that are a good few hours long, anyone who wants to try it can try it regardless of cost and anyone who still wants more after a few hours of solid playtime will probably not be all that fussed about paying $28 rather than $20 say.

txa1265 February 26th, 2010 19:14

In the time it takes to make it through his demo, you could have played through Mass Effect 1 AND 2 … ;)

crpgnut February 26th, 2010 20:33

Hmmm, I don't remember trying the demo for V. If there are really gameplay changes and not just window dressing, then it'd be worth at least downloading the demo. For me, even the story is rehashed, so I'm surprised that so many here like it. It's always Exiles vs Empire and it generally has the same high-level characters that you meet.

As far as pricing, I have no qualms with that at all. I don't make what I made 10 years ago, even though I provide the same basic services. I don't pay the same for gas, food, movies, golf, etc. so why expect to pay the same for games?

I may have to at least download the demo to see if it's really still the same old, same old before posting any more about it. Gotta see if I'm going to hate Div2 after getting dragon powers first. I'm at the point where the game is about to change and I've heard many people drop out at this point.

Melvil February 26th, 2010 21:35

The textures at 1920x1200 look pretty darn good for a Vogel game. Color palette is rich (32bit), the inventory ui is better than A1-3 as is the general control scheme imo. Those are some decent reasons for playing again I guess. Dunno about the linearity compared to 4 or 5, but both of those were much more linear than 1 - 3.

More polish, better ui, enhanced lo-fi graphics, party based skill progression, more melee options…sounds like a green light to me.

mute February 27th, 2010 09:02

For once i feel that it wasn't "that old". The new seamless resolution (floating window or what they are called :) ) made the game felt alot more modern.

The only thing i never liked with the Avernum games is the movement when not in fighting. I really would have hoped that geneforge engine would have got through to Avernum (the movement atleast).

But with that said. The graphic for a Vogel game really is good. And it feels modern. The writing and the describing of what the moodes the NPC are in is like beeing ripped from a 80s (early 90s) game. AND i mean that in a very positive way.

EDIT: To be sure my post isn't missread. I liked the demo. Alot.

ikbenrichard February 27th, 2010 12:58

Quote:

Originally Posted by Melvil (Post 1061000704)
The textures at 1920x1200 look pretty darn good for a Vogel game. Color palette is rich (32bit), the inventory ui is better than A1-3 as is the general control scheme imo. Those are some decent reasons for playing again I guess. Dunno about the linearity compared to 4 or 5, but both of those were much more linear than 1 - 3.

More polish, better ui, enhanced lo-fi graphics, party based skill progression, more melee options…sounds like a green light to me.

Indeed, same here. Bought the game just now. Well spend money.

turian February 27th, 2010 13:10

is there any button, to show stuff lying on the ground?

its kinda clunky pressing G all the time.

woges February 27th, 2010 14:03

Hold down tab it'll show what the buttons do, and yes the hand button bottom middle slightly to the left.

Sergius64 March 2nd, 2010 20:04

For some reason I have trouble getting into the Avernum series. I do like the later Geneforges and that Roman/Celt remake.

These games ARE very much on the tough side though. It seems like you have to get your builds just right, including holding off on improving skills via skillpoints if some dude can teach them to you for gold. Ends up being a case of you almost needing to read guides on the forums to make a character/party that can be successful in the game.

Especially in geneforge you would keep hitting these plateaus of power were you would wipe the floor with entire maps and then go to a map on the next "tier" and would have great trouble with it.

Warmark March 28th, 2010 21:31

Even though I've read about the Spiderweb games for years I never tried one, the graphics just looked too dated for me.
After finally giving in to a friend who has been after me forever to try one I downloaded the demo of Avernum 6 and man I haven't stopped playing it.

After about 45 minutes playing I forgot all about the graphics and was having a blast. Really good story and characters so far and also enjoying the turnbased combat, brings back a lot of old RPG memories.

So I've got this Quad core, 6G ram, 512 video card system and this is the game I'm enjoying the most right now, go figure lol.

BTW this demo is huge, I keep waiting for it to end forcing me to order up the rest of the game but it keeps on going.


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 10:11.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
vBulletin Security provided by DragonByte Security (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2022 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2022 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright by RPGWatch