Wasteland 2 - Thwacke Interview @ Ars Technica

aries100

SasqWatch
Joined
October 18, 2006
Messages
2,147
Location
Denmark, Europe
Ars Techica talked with Sebastian Alverado from Thwacke, the consulting firm which is helping with the development of the game when it comes to the science in it. A quote on why he started his company:
After a year and a half of mulling over the idea, Thwacke's Sebastian Alvarado officially set up shop in April. He was pushed by a frustration with games that tend to use science and technology as a kind of unexplained magic to make things work in a fictional world. Take the "genetic memories" that power the time-spanning animus in the Assassin's Creed games. Alvarado, an expert in evolutionary genetics himself, says there's actually something to the concept of passing down learning through genes. Still, "DNA is such an easy cop-out these days," he told Ars. "It's an easy way to explain all that, and they just expect the player to say, 'Well he said DNA so now I have to buy the story.' It's like a magic gateway.
And apparently, crabs survive a nuclear fallout:
The scientists found the humble hermit crab was a likely candidate for post-nuclear survival, thanks to its ability to absorb radiation in its shell and then discard it during a molting cycle. That's the academically valid, scientific part. But since this is still a video game, they wanted to make sure it was a little "off the wall" as Alvarado put it. "We used radiation as a very simple gaming mechanism to argue that it makes animals super large, because everyone knows radiation makes things super-large... we'll just take that one as a granted," he said, laughing. "So let's let these hermit crabs get [so big] they can't find housing in their conventional shell and they'll actually seek housing in a bus or a telephone booth or something like that."
It also important no to be to realistic, it is a game after all:
Alvarado agrees wholeheartedly. "I know some people are saying, 'Oh, I don't want Wasteland 2 to be scientifically accurate or realistic, because that would ruin such an off the wall game,' we're not doing that at all. ... We know that the game would be pretty boring if it had to be 100 percent realistic. We're trying to add some science facts on to their fiction just to give it a bit more grounding in reality. If you happen to identify with some of the actual science, you enjoy it that much more. If you don't, that's fine, you're still going to enjoy the game."
More information.
 
Joined
Oct 18, 2006
Messages
2,147
Location
Denmark, Europe
If they do giant insects, I would like them to show a mechanism to explain how they can inhale sufficient oxygen, as well as a method of sending enough blood to the limbs. It seems more likely to be some genetically engineered solution.
 
Joined
Mar 22, 2012
Messages
5,527
Location
Seattle
As for the giant insects, I remember a tv show I watched some years back. It is, it seems, all about the amount of oxygen in the air. The more oxygen in the air, the bigger the insects are. That's the explanation given in the tv-show.
 
Joined
Oct 18, 2006
Messages
2,147
Location
Denmark, Europe
Giant hermit crabs wearing a VW bug chassis as a shell sounds great to me.
 
Joined
Nov 20, 2006
Messages
1,710
Sorry to be crass, but I found the statement "apparently crabs survive a nuclear fallout" to be hilarious. That could be a Wasteland 2 perk -- "you have contracted crabs."
 
Joined
Sep 16, 2011
Messages
791
As for the giant insects, I remember a tv show I watched some years back. It is, it seems, all about the amount of oxygen in the air. The more oxygen in the air, the bigger the insects are. That's the explanation given in the tv-show.

Yeah the pre-historic insects supposedly were really large, saw a show about it recently.. Size can also be either advantage or disadvantage in evolution, for insects its probably better to be small (to escape for example birds), if birds died out they'd evolve differently.
 
Joined
Apr 18, 2011
Messages
3,263
Location
The land of rape and honey
Back
Top Bottom