..and you just keep on lying, i've never said it's critical, it's a detail among many in a game, and its a pretty minor one, thus there's nothing dramatic about it. I've only said i don't think it's optimal and that i don't like censorship (but that i understand it when it comes to children).
Using a word (critical) that you didn't specifically use isn't "lying" if it accurately describes the importance you're ascribing to CDPR's decision. And the outcomes you describe are pretty dramatic indeed. I'll use only your exact words, since you are so fond of semantic tripwires instead of arguing the actual point.
"In the end it's bad with this type of censorship or restrictions because there's only one route to how it will develop over time."
Yeah? What route is that, Vurt?
"I don't think it's a good idea to censorship it, it makes it a norm, it can spread to other things being unkillable (animals would be my guess could be up next) and to other mediums too."
I hate to use words you didn't use, but… let me be very careful now…. you're saying that not allowing us to kill children or plot-important NPCs will lead to other things being unkillable, animals first among them. And that it could lead to movies and TVs shows and books also not allowing the killing of children. That seems like a big deal to me, and it seems like a big deal to you too.
What other things, besides animals, do you think might be verboten?
"If over the years blood, for example, was censored from games most people would not be bothered with it either. We would have enjoyed so many games that didn't have it and still we had a great time with these games. It doesn't make it perfect or preferable, it'll just be a new norm that most is willing to accept."
What else, Vurt?
"In this day and age i can see how there's probably those who would prefer if e.g a certain gender or people of certain skin colors were unkillable too.. "
So this non-critical, just a small detail decision has led, in this future dystopia, to games not being allowed to show the killing of children, people with specific skin colors, and animals, as well as not showing blood when we kill whom we're allowed to kill.
Hmm, I'm noticing a trend here. Bringing up race in a discussion that had nothing to do with race. Selectively ignoring the parts of posts that don't support your point, while throwing out insults (you're too sensitive, you're a liar, you can't keep up with me) instead of responding to them. What group does this remind me of?
"….and there's the usual fanboyism here where certain people dresses up in their shiny white armor to fight whatever tiny issue other people have with "their" game."
Shiny white armor, gee, what group uses that phrase every time someone voices a concern with how anyone is treated in any setting?