|
Your donations keep RPGWatch running!
Mass Effect 2 - Tech Analysis @ Eurogamer
February 16th, 2010, 13:31
I don't know how interesting this is but Eurogamer has a Tech Analysis of Mass Effect 2, examining the frame rates and technical improvements of the sequel, particularly on the X360. Here's a quick sample to see if this is your thing:
There are similarities with the first game. Cut-scenes can and will drop down to 20FPS in order to maintain the excellent detail levels BioWare demands from its characters, and there are still jumps in places between 20FPS and 30FPS during the arcade sections, but overall performance, particularly when it comes to tearing (now at 2.5 per cent in these clips - most of the time ME2 passes as a v-synced game), is obviously smoother.More information.
This has all been achieved with a range of technological improvements across the board, combined with sharper level design more in tune with the limitations of the engine.
February 16th, 2010, 13:31
Cool read. Mass Effect 2 on the Xbox 360 truly does look astounding and not in the least because of BioWare's excellent art direction. It's probably also near the max of what the Xbox 360 hardware can produce. Time for the next-gen? 
It's interesting that the PC version looks so much the same. It runs smoothly on a modest graphics card. It does make me wonder what a fast PC can really churn out these days. I'm a graphics engine whore and I want to see the future.

It's interesting that the PC version looks so much the same. It runs smoothly on a modest graphics card. It does make me wonder what a fast PC can really churn out these days. I'm a graphics engine whore and I want to see the future.
SasqWatch
February 16th, 2010, 14:55
February 16th, 2010, 15:08
I haven't played Crysis, but from what I've heard people say, that game doesn't even look that great compared to some others. Maybe it's the art direction and nothing technical, but screenshots and videos of the game couldn't really win me over, neither.
I'm longing for another revolution like the big engine updates brought by Doom, Quake, Unreal, Doom 3, Half-Life 2, etc. I guess that'll be Unreal Engine 4 for the next-gen hardware that's supposedly in the design stage and planned for 2012.
Anyway, there are still some big-budget PC-only games and even those do not offer revolutionary new graphical prowess. I guess most of them also have to consider the mid-end hardware in their game development.
I'm longing for another revolution like the big engine updates brought by Doom, Quake, Unreal, Doom 3, Half-Life 2, etc. I guess that'll be Unreal Engine 4 for the next-gen hardware that's supposedly in the design stage and planned for 2012.
Anyway, there are still some big-budget PC-only games and even those do not offer revolutionary new graphical prowess. I guess most of them also have to consider the mid-end hardware in their game development.
SasqWatch
February 16th, 2010, 15:13
For what it's worth, I consider Crysis the best looking game I've ever seen, bar none.
Guest
February 16th, 2010, 15:16
Originally Posted by ThaurinTo be honest,I think they're lying.
I haven't played Crysis, but from what I've heard people say, that game doesn't even look that great compared to some others.
Crysis was released more than 2 years ago and it's still (technically)the best looking game.
As you said I expect id's next game to be revolutionary but until it's released Crysis has no competition.
February 16th, 2010, 15:28
I guess there's no replacement for seeing the game run with your own eyes. Video and screenshots don't do it justice, then. Time to upgrade my PC (still). 
Anyway, graphics cards have had an awesome time these past two years and games could easily look even *better* than Crysis now. I'm just so very curious how that would look…

Anyway, graphics cards have had an awesome time these past two years and games could easily look even *better* than Crysis now. I'm just so very curious how that would look…
SasqWatch
February 16th, 2010, 15:36
Originally Posted by ThaurinGotta wait until the next-gen consoles
I guess there's no replacement for seeing the game run with your own eyes. Video and screenshots don't do it justice, then. Time to upgrade my PC (still).
Anyway, graphics cards have had an awesome time these past two years and games could easily look even *better* than Crysis now. I'm just so very curious how that would look…
Guest
February 16th, 2010, 16:09
With games produced for PS3/XBox, the power of the PC graphiccards aren't used.
--
Mankind must put an end to war or war will put an end to mankind. - John F Kennedy
An eye for an eye, and soon the whole world is blind. - Mahatma Gandhi
The world is my country. To do good is my religion. My mind is my own church. This simple creed is all we need to enjoy peace on earth. - Thomas Paine
Mankind must put an end to war or war will put an end to mankind. - John F Kennedy
An eye for an eye, and soon the whole world is blind. - Mahatma Gandhi
The world is my country. To do good is my religion. My mind is my own church. This simple creed is all we need to enjoy peace on earth. - Thomas Paine
February 16th, 2010, 16:15
There are similarities with the first game. Cut-scenes can and will drop down to 20FPS in order to maintain the excellent detail levels BioWare demands from its charactersI wonder why the drop in FPS. Aren't the cut-scenes pre-rendered?
February 16th, 2010, 21:52
Originally Posted by JDR13Not at all. This was obvious in the first Mass Effect where the texture pop-in occured more often and was more obvious. I don't think Mass Effect 2 has any pre-rendered cut-scenes anywhere, although I do suspect a few short scenes at the beginning to be pre-rendered. Not really sure there, but it's nothing major. I watched a very nice scene that cut away to a planet's surface just know and it had a loading screen before it. I think it's pretty damn impressive, the in-game scenes that Mass Effects 2 is able to produce.
I wonder why the drop in FPS. Aren't the cut-scenes pre-rendered?
Also, frame-rate drops or not, I haven't found them bothersome in the least.
SasqWatch
|
|
All times are GMT +2. The time now is 05:55.


