|
Your donations keep RPGWatch running!
RPGWatch Forums » Comments » News Comments » Torment: Tides of Numenera - Third Alpha Systems Test Released, Crisis Gameplay

Default Torment: Tides of Numenera - Third Alpha Systems Test Released, Crisis Gameplay

October 8th, 2015, 12:41
Originally Posted by Humanity has risen! View Post
The Numenera setting is complete pretentious, insufferable garbage filled with incomprehensible mumbo jumbo to make it look "edgy". None of the people I know who play the PnP game are any interested in it anymore after having briefly tried it and abandoned it very quickly.

I don't see what is so special about these "crisis" events, other tactical games have had them before. It's not like you're going to get the flexibility of a PnP system because every special event is going to be scripted and predefined.
There's our little sunbeam!
Ripper is offline

Ripper

Ripper's Avatar
Бажаю успіху

#21

Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 11,267
Mentioned: 121 Post(s)
+1:

Default 

October 8th, 2015, 12:43
At least HHR will have Grimoire to play very soon now

DArtagnan

Guest

#22

Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
+1:

Default 

October 8th, 2015, 12:49
Originally Posted by Humanity has risen! View Post
I don't see what is so special about these "crisis" events, other tactical games have had them before. It's not like you're going to get the flexibility of a PnP system because every special event is going to be scripted and predefined.
I've heard the same complaint about Age of Decadence, and I prefer a heavily scripted game with a lot of options over one with more free-form gameplay without options. Because that's the two choices we have been offered so far.

Sacred_Path

Guest

#23

Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)

Default 

October 8th, 2015, 13:38
Originally Posted by DArtagnan View Post
The new X-Com made it popular, which is the point. D&D never had a "two-actions" system.

I happen to agree it's a weak system.
D&D always had it, but not as limited as new Xcom. Numenera is based on D&D rules, so I don't see a problem with them implementing it this way.
Archangel is offline

Archangel

SasqWatch

#24

Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 3,819
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)

Default 

October 8th, 2015, 13:43
Originally Posted by Archangel View Post
D&D always had it, but not as limited as new Xcom. Numenera is based on D&D rules, so I don't see a problem with them implementing it this way.
Why am I not surprised that you don't know the D&D rules

Maybe you're thinking of full-round actions, move actions, standard actions, free actions, swift actions, immediate actions and so on?

Not only is that something that was introduced much later in the history of the system, it's also anything but a two-action system.

http://www.dandwiki.com/wiki/SRD:Action_Types

DArtagnan

Guest

#25

Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)

Default 

October 8th, 2015, 13:47
I played D&D from AD&D and it had move + attack or move + cast spells. After that it got even more like that with 3.0e where they put even more sub actions.

The main point that you managed to ignore to appear like you know what you are talking about was that this was all before new Xcom, so new Xcom cannot be blamed for TToN.
Archangel is offline

Archangel

SasqWatch

#26

Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 3,819
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)

Default 

October 8th, 2015, 13:51
I played it from before AD&D

In AD&D, you were free to move back and forth during a round, for instance. It was nothing like this new trend of limiting players to almost no choice at all.

DArtagnan

Guest

#27

Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)

Default 

October 8th, 2015, 13:55
Originally Posted by Archangel View Post
I played D&D from AD&D and it had move + attack or move + cast spells. After that it got even more like that with 3.0e where they put even more sub actions.

The main point that you managed to ignore to appear like you know what you are talking about was that this was all before new Xcom, so new Xcom cannot be blamed for TToN.
The main point that you've chosen to ignore, as well as being factually incorrect, is that the new X-Com seems to have made it popular.

No one claimed that X-Com "invented" a two-action system.

As such, it's arguably to blame for the TREND not the system in itself.

Clear?

DArtagnan

Guest

#28

Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)

Default 

October 8th, 2015, 15:02
Originally Posted by DArtagnan View Post
I would start by not taking up 40-50% of the entire screen by using transparent panels, with adjustable opacity for people who don't mind
Many things, especially the combat log, but also stuff like the tooltips and names/bars/etc. above enemies, are obviously unfinished art not far above debug levels. They're in there solely for testing functionality.

The demo and KS update both repeatedly note that the UI is in a WIP state. We'll be tweaking things plenty from here.
sea is offline

sea

sea's Avatar
Watchdog

#29

Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 144
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)

Default 

October 8th, 2015, 15:03
Originally Posted by DArtagnan View Post
UI is pretty terrible, but combat looks interesting.
Totally.

What are these shiny bright colours doing in a Torment game? :-)
Last edited by Glorian; February 10th, 2016 at 21:47.
Glorian is offline

Glorian

Borislav Slavov

#30

Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 142
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)

Default 

October 8th, 2015, 15:04
Originally Posted by sea View Post
Most of those things, especially the combat log, are obviously unfinished art not far above debug levels. They're in there solely for testing functionality (in this case, we wanted some way to show combat log text).

The demo and KS update both repeatedly note that the UI is in a WIP state. We'll be tweaking things plenty from here.
Obviously, it's not obvious exactly how you intend to change it.

But you're saying the interface won't take up that much of the screen at release? Cool - that's all I wanted to know

DArtagnan

Guest

#31

Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)

Default 

October 8th, 2015, 15:08
Originally Posted by DArtagnan View Post
Obviously, it's not obvious exactly how you intend to change it.

But you're saying the interface won't take up that much of the screen at release? Cool - that's all I wanted to know
I can't specifically say that, I'm not involved enough to make comments there (though as I move off of Wasteland 2 I might end up working more on Torment directly). But:

Originally Posted by JDR13 View Post
I didn't really notice it until now, but yeah…that dialogue box is massive. I'll give them the benefit of the doubt and assume there's going to be an option to adjust the size of that thing.
We previously noted in other alpha updates that the dialog box was being redesigned - in part because we are switching our GUI system over from NGUI to UGUI, due to many bug fixes and improvements made in Unity 5's built-in GUI system vs. in Unity 4, which the game used to run on.

While I still suspect the conversation window will be "big" compared to some games, the styling and sizing, like anything else, is still be subject to change.
sea is offline

sea

sea's Avatar
Watchdog

#32

Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 144
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)

Default 

October 8th, 2015, 15:13
Originally Posted by sea View Post
While I still suspect the conversation window will be "big" compared to some games, the styling and sizing, like anything else, is still be subject to change.
So, nothing is obvious after all

In any case, I think the game looks interesting - though I was never a big Torment fan.

But I tend to greatly enjoy TB combat.

As such, I really hope you will let me watch the world as I talk to people and interact in general.

Knowing myself, I'll probably get this regardless, out of sheer curiousity, though.

I do enjoy the LOOK of the UI, as in I find it aesthetically interesting. I just think it's a little ridiculous in terms of size.

DArtagnan

Guest

#33

Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
+1:

Default 

October 8th, 2015, 15:48
The HUD elements appear to me to be of a reasonable size. The larger dialog interface that autohides also seems to change size as required, depending on the text. Seems fine to me for text-heavy game.
Ripper is offline

Ripper

Ripper's Avatar
Бажаю успіху

#34

Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 11,267
Mentioned: 121 Post(s)
+1:

Default 

October 8th, 2015, 16:08
I think this looks so boring and bland compared to the original Torment. Combat looks much more fun though… but that part really sucked in the original so it is not hard to top.
GothicGothicness is offline

GothicGothicness

GothicGothicness's Avatar
SasqWatch

#35

Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,233
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)

Default 

October 8th, 2015, 16:50
Originally Posted by GothicGothicness View Post
I think this looks so boring and bland compared to the original Torment. Combat looks much more fun though… but that part really sucked in the original so it is not hard to top.
I agree. The environments are looking very bland, sterile and generic. No contest with the nice painted backgrounds of PST (and that game is 16 years old!). There is just absolutely no "atmosphere" coming through from anything that has been shown so far while PST was oozing atmo.
I wish that inXile would have put more emphasis on attention to detail and really fleshed out the locations.
It remains to be seen but I fear they might have chosen a quantity over quality approach, i.e. a massive game world with many locations but a lack of detail in the locations. I prefer if it's done the other way around. But that might be just me.

And the mega-intrusive UI is definitely one of those things they should not copy from the old Infinity engine games. Just like Obsidian they seem to forget that they are supposed to only bring back the good parts but improve upon the bad and clunky crap from that era.
Moriendor is offline

Moriendor

Moriendor's Avatar
Pathological Liar
RPGWatch Donor

#36

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Schland
Posts: 3,204
Mentioned: 21 Post(s)

Default 

October 8th, 2015, 16:52
Originally Posted by Moriendor View Post
It remains to be seen but I fear they might have chosen a quantity over quality approach, i.e. a massive game world with many locations but a lack of detail in the locations. I prefer if it's done the other way around. But that might be just me.
I doubt that since the game seems to be built around replays.

Sacred_Path

Guest

#37

Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)

Default 

October 8th, 2015, 18:55
*All this is my opinion, please don't take it personally*

Well, I generally like reading what HHR has to say, but nothing wrong with poking a bit of fun. One thing you can depend on though, is the guy usually has a solid and deeply held opinion, and that makes his posts interesting. And I can see what he means by "pretentious". Yea, there is a bit of a whiff of that in this game, in the writing. But I can overlook it. To a point.

And about the gigantic dialog UI - there was a recent video not too long ago which showed the opening of the game, and it contained basically 5 novels of reading before you got to do hardly anything. I complained about it in the thread at the time. So that is one concern, that these writers think every word they write is golden, and so there is a danger the game will have too much text. Now, maybe I'm out of step with others expectations in this, I admit that.

But I have read tons of books and to be honest, video game writing is often very amateurish, and I don't find it interesting most of the time. So I just hope they get a merciless editor, who will force those writers to cut some of their "brilliant" stuff they are cooking up. You know, maybe instead of the equivalent of reading 5 novels at the start of the game, they can cut it down to only one novel before you get to do anything.

Anyway, that is why I'm guessing they need a gigantic dialog UI, because they know the game is basically riddled with text to wade through. I will probably be skipping a lot of it, to be honest, unless they cut some of it to a reasonable level, and not make it so it gets really boring and tedious, and yes, pretentious.
Arkadia7 is offline

Arkadia7

Arkadia7's Avatar
SasqWatch
Original Sin 2 Donor

#38

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Pacific NorthWest, USA!
Posts: 1,981
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)

Default 

October 8th, 2015, 19:24
Originally Posted by Arkadia7 View Post
And I can see what he means by "pretentious". Yea, there is a bit of a whiff of that in this game, in the writing. But I can overlook it. To a point.
par for the course for a Torment game IMO

Sacred_Path

Guest

#39

Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)

Default 

October 8th, 2015, 20:44
Originally Posted by sea View Post
I can't specifically say that, I'm not involved enough to make comments there (though as I move off of Wasteland 2 I might end up working more on Torment directly). But:

We previously noted in other alpha updates that the dialog box was being redesigned - in part because we are switching our GUI system over from NGUI to UGUI, due to many bug fixes and improvements made in Unity 5's built-in GUI system vs. in Unity 4, which the game used to run on.

While I still suspect the conversation window will be "big" compared to some games, the styling and sizing, like anything else, is still be subject to change.
Top-notch graphics and beautiful non-combat GUI. Excellent and clear writing! The combat GUI is better than W2's.
mercy is offline

mercy

mercy's Avatar
SasqWatch

#40

Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 3,111
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
RPGWatch Forums » Comments » News Comments » Torment: Tides of Numenera - Third Alpha Systems Test Released, Crisis Gameplay

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT +2. The time now is 10:49.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
vBulletin Security provided by DragonByte Security (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2022 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2022 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright by RPGWatch