|
Your donations keep RPGWatch running!
The Console-ization of PCs
March 9th, 2016, 17:06
I'm somewhat surprised that Ars Technica advocates the console-ization of PCs:
http://arstechnica.com/gaming/2016/0…-needs-fixing/
This ought to really piss off Joxer.
http://arstechnica.com/gaming/2016/0…-needs-fixing/
This ought to really piss off Joxer.
Watcher
March 9th, 2016, 17:18
Consoleization of PC meant to make the PC not horrible…and he claims that smartphones were already consoleized. WTF! What has that guy been smoking?
Malware in all its various types is endemic. Even good software comes bundled with undesirable spyware. Software applications suffer incompatibilities with each other; they suffer incompatibilities with device drivers. Programs do not uninstall cleanly, leaving detritus scattered hither and yon. They also don't upgrade consistently, with every single application having its own patching and updating infrastructure. Even when everything works, upgrading your operating system is prone to breaking it all.How is that different from smartphones and consoles? Especially for the smartphones and malwares.
Beyond the API-level checking to get in the store, the sandboxing means that apps simply can't access things they shouldn't.That's why apps ask to access everything on my tablet every time I'n installing something from the Google Store and if I click no, it won't install. So much security…
--
It's developer is owned by Sony which means it'll remain a hostage of inferior hardware. ~ joxer
It's developer is owned by Sony which means it'll remain a hostage of inferior hardware. ~ joxer
SasqWatch
Original Sin Donor
| +1: |
March 9th, 2016, 17:39
That article reminds me of the people that claim Apple doesn't get viruses. Just a lack of knowledge and an over simplification of facts.
Waste of the authors time.
Waste of the authors time.
| +1: |
| +1: |
March 9th, 2016, 18:54
Originally Posted by WisdomMore like waste of readers' time.
That article reminds me of the people that claim Apple doesn't get viruses. Just a lack of knowledge and an over simplification of facts.
Waste of the authors time.
We're past win8/metro/touchscreen era where articles "The phoneization of PCs" would be worth reading. Microsoft failed and rarely anyone wanted to accept converting their overpowered PC into just another chinese few bucks phone.
Today worth reading would be windows store possible upcoming scandal(s?) and Microsoft's horrible Universal Windows Apps idea.
Luckily there are such ones. For example about why UWA is generally not a good idea:
http://www.pcgamer.com/why-pc-games-…niversal-apps/
Originally Posted by NecrosisNah.
This ought to really piss off Joxer.![]()
I'm actually amused with it. Feels like watching some clown show.
--
Toka Koka
Toka Koka
| +1: |
March 9th, 2016, 20:07
Originally Posted by joxerThat's another excellent article from Peter Thoman.
For example about why UWA is generally not a good idea:
http://www.pcgamer.com/why-pc-games-…niversal-apps/
In my mind, the exchange between the Ars Technica guy and Peter Thoman looks something like this:
loading…
|
|
All times are GMT +2. The time now is 07:26.
