|
Your donations keep RPGWatch running!
View Poll Results - If you are offered one thing (in abundance), what would you choose
| 1. Happiness |
|
6 | 35.29% |
| 2. Appreciation |
|
1 | 5.88% |
| 3. Intelligence |
|
0 | 0% |
| 4. Physical youth (body of an adolescent) |
|
1 | 5.88% |
| 5. Money |
|
1 | 5.88% |
| 6. Knowledge |
|
0 | 0% |
| 7. Good looks |
|
0 | 0% |
| 8. Good health (and painless death) |
|
3 | 17.65% |
| 9. Long life |
|
4 | 23.53% |
| 10. Luck |
|
1 | 5.88% |
Voters: 17. You may not vote on this poll
If you are offered one thing (in abundance)
February 5th, 2019, 15:06
Originally Posted by Darth TagnanOf course!
That said, I hope I can keep the qualities that I already have![]()
Originally Posted by wolfgrimdarkYup! The other options remain the same.
But nothing was said that be choosing one you had none of the other to some degree either - just that the one in most abundance was the one picked.
Btw kittens are more cuddly.
--
Getting a YouTube video loaded and other BB codes, see this post
Getting a YouTube video loaded and other BB codes, see this post
February 5th, 2019, 16:10
Luck.
I assume people believe it's about lottery or lootboxes scam, but I'm not talking about that. I'm talking about those certain points in life when it matters a lot.
A few centuries back I got kicked out of an apartment for whatever reason (it's was actually a dump, but I was young, inexperienced and not needy) and somehow a random acquaitance appeared and helped me to find another. Of course, I made a best friend of that same person later. Sadly the life in current society made us move in different places far away from each other, but writing it in details would be a long story unfit for this thread.
Seems that long life is a popular choice. Just so you know, every CEO, every torturer and every psycho eventually dies. Evolution made sure scum can't outlive every potential victim.
I assume people believe it's about lottery or lootboxes scam, but I'm not talking about that. I'm talking about those certain points in life when it matters a lot.
A few centuries back I got kicked out of an apartment for whatever reason (it's was actually a dump, but I was young, inexperienced and not needy) and somehow a random acquaitance appeared and helped me to find another. Of course, I made a best friend of that same person later. Sadly the life in current society made us move in different places far away from each other, but writing it in details would be a long story unfit for this thread.
Seems that long life is a popular choice. Just so you know, every CEO, every torturer and every psycho eventually dies. Evolution made sure scum can't outlive every potential victim.
--
Toka Koka
Toka Koka
February 5th, 2019, 16:10
Originally Posted by wolfgrimdarkIt would directly link to Appreciation, Happiness and perhaps also Health (there has been some research about dogs and health in humans)…
That being said I don't really see any right or wrong choice here. Well except for puppies, they are always the right choice.
I'm personally more of a birdman.
…pets can annoy the hell out of you too though, so i guess it's not totally inconclusive
--
Latest creations: Fallout NV: A Wasteland in Bloom / Fallout NV: WFO v3.5
Latest creations: Fallout NV: A Wasteland in Bloom / Fallout NV: WFO v3.5
February 5th, 2019, 19:31
Originally Posted by vurtLol so can kids for that matter. Prefer dogs over children in that regard.
It would directly link to Appreciation, Happiness and perhaps also Health (there has been some research about dogs and health in humans)…
I'm personally more of a birdman.
…pets can annoy the hell out of you too though, so i guess it's not totally inconclusive![]()
Aye read some articles on dogs and health - or pets and health in general.
Inconclusive is true as well as not everyone is a pet person or has their own preferences of course
--
Character is centrality, the impossibility of being displaced or overset. - Ralph Waldo Emerson
Character is centrality, the impossibility of being displaced or overset. - Ralph Waldo Emerson
February 5th, 2019, 19:53
I have read a study that showed that kids make a person/couple less happy compared to those that do not have kids. As the children reach the age of 25 or so the parents get happier again, and they then tend to look back at the past feeling fulfilled forgetting the setbacks and struggles at the time.
I’d like to see a study comparing happiness while having pets vs. having kids. I think pets win.
I’d like to see a study comparing happiness while having pets vs. having kids. I think pets win.
--
Getting a YouTube video loaded and other BB codes, see this post
Getting a YouTube video loaded and other BB codes, see this post
February 5th, 2019, 19:56
I'm pretty sure having children that love you is preferable once you reach old age, regardless. That sensation when death isn't necessarily entirely final - and that you're surrounded by loved ones as you leave this world.
Probably not something I will experience - but that would certainly be my guess.
Probably not something I will experience - but that would certainly be my guess.
Guest
| +1: |
February 5th, 2019, 20:15
Originally Posted by JDR13Long life in abundance = time in abundance, no?
Why is time not on that list?![]()
--
Latest creations: Fallout NV: A Wasteland in Bloom / Fallout NV: WFO v3.5
Latest creations: Fallout NV: A Wasteland in Bloom / Fallout NV: WFO v3.5
February 5th, 2019, 20:17
Originally Posted by Darth TagnanAfaik many/most people die alone or oblivious of what is happening or in the company of busy hospital staff.
I'm pretty sure having children that love you is preferable once you reach old age, regardless. That sensation when death isn't necessarily entirely final - and that you're surrounded by loved ones as you leave this world.
Probably not something I will experience - but that would certainly be my guess.
Euthanasia has the advantage one is able to choose the time and company.
Originally Posted by JDR13Time is money. And the other way around.
Why is time not on that list?![]()
--
Getting a YouTube video loaded and other BB codes, see this post
Getting a YouTube video loaded and other BB codes, see this post
| +1: |
February 5th, 2019, 20:17
I sort of interpreted it that way.
Of course, I'd rather be young for a very long time - than just make it to 120 with Alzheimers.
Of course, I'd rather be young for a very long time - than just make it to 120 with Alzheimers.
Guest
February 5th, 2019, 20:22
Originally Posted by EyeI don't know the statistic there. But I do know that I believe what I said - that having children who love you as you grow old is preferable to the alternative - as many old people tend to lose their friends and, if they don't have children, they often end up living many years without any kind of love or companionship. This is regardless of whether or not the family is there at the very last minute.
Afaik many/most people die alone or oblivious of what is happening or in the company of busy hospital staff. Euthanasia is nicem then you can choose the tine and company.
Of course, I know from personal experience that a lot of people DO have their families present right before they die, which is really what I'm talking about.
That said, there's obviously no guarentee that your children love you enough to actually bother being with you very frequently as you grow older - and I know several families where that wasn't quite the case.
Guest
February 6th, 2019, 03:25
Originally Posted by wolfgrimdarkYou were watching the Puppy Bowl on Sunday, weren't you?
Puppies! There is no other choice as they bring happiness and long life as well as good health![]()
--
The very powerful and the very stupid have one thing in common: instead of altering their views to fit the facts, they alter the facts to fit their views….-- Doctor Who in "Face of Evil"
| +1: |
February 6th, 2019, 04:12
Cheese.
Duh.
Duh.
--
"But if it's a battle," he said, "which side is which?"
"If it's a battle," said Lilac.
"But if it's a battle," he said, "which side is which?"
"If it's a battle," said Lilac.
| +1: |
|
|
All times are GMT +2. The time now is 06:27.
