|
Your donations keep RPGWatch running!
The Science Thread
February 9th, 2022, 12:44
Originally Posted by RedglyphO you're surely joking, right?
Nature has always been a great source of romantic inspiration.
Spoiler
Well, whatever turns you on, I suggest this one :
Spoiler
--
Getting a YouTube video loaded and other BB codes, see this post
Getting a YouTube video loaded and other BB codes, see this post
February 9th, 2022, 18:05
Originally Posted by RedglyphHere it would be appropriate to link the video for Pink Floyd's Empty Spaces.
Nature has always been a great source of romantic inspiration.
pbbuR who unfortunatelyhas posted that particular link already (in some thread he can't remember)
--
Over the mountain watching the watcher
Over the mountain watching the watcher
| +1: |
February 9th, 2022, 19:47
Originally Posted by EyeThe term "turn on" or "to be rurned on" is literally to be found as "anmachen" in the German language - both meaning switches and human intercourse.
Well, whatever turns you on, I suggest this one :
--
"Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction." (E.F.Schumacher, Economist, Source)
"Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction." (E.F.Schumacher, Economist, Source)
February 25th, 2022, 19:51
That's quite the weirdo (science.org, it's in Nature too but not free)
Largest bacterium ever discovered has an unexpectedly complex cellEDIT: seems like the quoted text is mutating and getting more complex too
Giant microbe from a mangrove could be a missing link between single-celled organisms and the cells that make up humans
By definition, microbes are supposed to be so small they can only be seen with a microscope. But a newly described bacterium living in Caribbean mangroves never got that memo (see video, above). Its threadlike single cell is visible to the naked eye, growing up to 2 centimeters—as long as a peanut—and 5000 times bigger than many other microbes. What’s more, this giant has a huge genome that’s not free floating inside the cell as in other bacteria, but is instead encased in a membrane, an innovation characteristic of much more complex cells, like those in the human body.
[. . .]
March 9th, 2022, 19:21

pibbuR whose favourite is the immedate value theorem.
--
Over the mountain watching the watcher
Over the mountain watching the watcher
| +1: |
March 17th, 2022, 14:17
Here's a funny research application, propeller-less drones using ion propulsion. I had never heard of the idea before, not sure how I missed that.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UGM4JXVB5FM
https://newatlas.com/drones/ion-prop…-technologies/
Another project, with a plane this time: https://arstechnica.com/science/2018…-moving-parts/
I'm somewhat skeptical about the autonomy and the fact it will have to rely on batteries (because they require rare materials), but it's an awesome propulsion concept.
PS: I still prefer the smell of avgas and the sound of some propeller engines like the Merlin or any turboprop, but who wouldn't?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UGM4JXVB5FM
https://newatlas.com/drones/ion-prop…-technologies/
Another project, with a plane this time: https://arstechnica.com/science/2018…-moving-parts/
I'm somewhat skeptical about the autonomy and the fact it will have to rely on batteries (because they require rare materials), but it's an awesome propulsion concept.
PS: I still prefer the smell of avgas and the sound of some propeller engines like the Merlin or any turboprop, but who wouldn't?
March 31st, 2022, 23:57
Eew. . .


Robot made of magnetic slime could grab objects inside your bodySource: New Scientist
Slime that can be controlled by a magnetic field can navigate tight spaces and grasp objects, making it ideal for possible uses inside the body
[. . .]
Li Zhang at the Chinese University of Hong Kong and his colleagues mixed neodymium magnet particles with borax, a common household detergent, and polyvinyl alcohol, a kind of resin, to form a slime that can be controlled
loading…
--
Getting a YouTube video loaded and other BB codes, see this post
Getting a YouTube video loaded and other BB codes, see this post
| +1: |
April 28th, 2022, 10:17
Interesting thought but I'm not convinced, it raises too many questions.
Then who knows what happens with the force of impact when they hit the surface.
It would be more convincing if they gathered similar data from a meteorite on the Moon surface when they get back there. At least it would make any risk of earlier contamination much lower.
The thought of it is exciting though.
That seems to be in conflict with the RNA world hypothesis, too, at least on Earth.
All of the bases in DNA and RNA have now been found in meteoritesSince those nucleobases are fragile, I don't see how they'd resist the heat when the meteorite descends through atmosphere. Nor how they'd resist to radiations in space after being exposed for so many years.
The discovery adds to evidence that suggests life’s precursors came from space
More of the ingredients for life have been found in meteorites.
Space rocks that fell to Earth within the last century contain the five bases that store information in DNA and RNA, scientists report April 26 in Nature Communications.
These “nucleobases” — adenine, guanine, cytosine, thymine and uracil — combine with sugars and phosphates to make up the genetic code of all life on Earth. Whether these basic ingredients for life first came from space or instead formed in a warm soup of earthly chemistry is still not known (SN: 9/24/20). But the discovery adds to evidence that suggests life’s precursors originally came from space, the researchers say.
Scientists have detected bits of adenine, guanine and other organic compounds in meteorites since the 1960s (SN: 8/10/11, SN: 12/4/20). Researchers have also seen hints of uracil, but cytosine and thymine remained elusive, until now.
“We’ve completed the set of all the bases found in DNA and RNA and life on Earth, and they’re present in meteorites,” says astrochemist Daniel Glavin of NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Md.
[. . .]
Then who knows what happens with the force of impact when they hit the surface.
It would be more convincing if they gathered similar data from a meteorite on the Moon surface when they get back there. At least it would make any risk of earlier contamination much lower.
The thought of it is exciting though.
That seems to be in conflict with the RNA world hypothesis, too, at least on Earth.
April 28th, 2022, 12:05
Maybe these nucleobases are just everywhere in the universe. Every new planet that has been formed, has them already, just as every meteorite.
--
In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move. Douglas Adams
There are no facts, only interpretations. Nietzsche
Some cause happiness wherever they go; others whenever they go. Oscar Wilde
In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move. Douglas Adams
There are no facts, only interpretations. Nietzsche
Some cause happiness wherever they go; others whenever they go. Oscar Wilde
April 28th, 2022, 14:50
Maybe. I've found that NASA had reproduced C, T and U from pyrimidine in conditions that are similar to space. This would answer the question of resistance of some of the nucleobases in harsh conditions: maybe they were regenerated from that molecule instead.
ref: https://www.nasa.gov/content/nasa-am…-in-laboratory
Since it's widely available, perhaps it makes sense its derivatives were used as building blocks by organisms.
A is widely available too, but is that because there are already organisms? I don't know about G.
ref: https://www.nasa.gov/content/nasa-am…-in-laboratory
Since it's widely available, perhaps it makes sense its derivatives were used as building blocks by organisms.
A is widely available too, but is that because there are already organisms? I don't know about G.
| +1: |
Yesterday, 10:06
It is Friday the 13th.
Apparently Friday has a bigger chance of being the thirteenth than any other day of the week, that is what I learned from a Dutch newspaper.
In the spoiler you can find the calculation, translated using Google Translate.
Apparently Friday has a bigger chance of being the thirteenth than any other day of the week, that is what I learned from a Dutch newspaper.
In the spoiler you can find the calculation, translated using Google Translate.
Spoiler
--
Getting a YouTube video loaded and other BB codes, see this post
Getting a YouTube video loaded and other BB codes, see this post
Yesterday, 10:25
That's surprising!
Probability is counter-intuitive, sometimes (the birthday paradox, for instance). But nothing complicated here then, it's just how the calendar was set vs days of the week? Still, quite unexpected.
Probability is counter-intuitive, sometimes (the birthday paradox, for instance). But nothing complicated here then, it's just how the calendar was set vs days of the week? Still, quite unexpected.
| +1: |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
All times are GMT +2. The time now is 07:29.



