What I've Been Watching: The Catch-All Film Thread

My old post (a part of it) first:
Never heard of this one, but thanks to news about it's "unban" from USA theaters I'm now eager to see it. Where… Nowhere most probably which means importing DVD from Russia (yes, they have it) or some asian online shops and then finding some silly fansubs, arrgh.
36.15 code Père Noël aka Game Over aka Dial Code Santa Claus (1989).
Trailer:

I know that except me, noone on this site didn't watch it which is not your fault due to it's obscurity:
https://www.cracked.com/article_26919_the-insane-holiday-classic-nobody-remembers.html
The Insane Holiday Classic Nobody Remembers

This 1989 French thriller focuses on Thomas, a ten-year-old boy with a mullet so magnificent that it's an affront to God. Thomas is a kid genius straight out of … well, ever other movie from the '80s. He's also obsessed with action movies, as evidenced by the fact that he cosplays as Rambo before he's even had breakfast.

This is the first year Thomas is skeptical of Santa's existence, which leads him to try to contact Kris Kringle on "Minitel," a pre-internet French computer network. Because even this proto-internet is a toxic garbage place, he's somehow connected with a rando beardo creepo -- an idea writer/director Rene Manzor had after he tried to buy flowers for his mom on Minitel and was "accidentally connected to a sex chat room." (Yes. Accidentally. Sure.)
Nobody remembers? Right. :)

While it was originally only in theaters for a week, Dial Code Santa Claus has become something of a cult phenomenon lately. While a 2017 restoration recently played at film festivals and rep theaters, it's unfortunately not on DVD or Blu-Ray outside of France. But as of this month, it's available to stream on Shudder. So if you watch only one movie about a child learning the true meaning of Christmas through shocking brutality, maybe give this one a try.
This information is partially wrong, except the french release, russia and asia also released it on optical media.
Because it's now finally avaliable as stream, give it a shot already! It's brilliant.
You might need VPN for Shudder, but it's nearly as annoying as importing hassle.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Apr 12, 2009
Messages
23,459
Connected to my previous post about professional critics criteria.
This is today's metacritic's list of 50ish worst movies in 2019 (not all possible titles from worldwide cionematography, just those that have a few critic entries on metacritic):
https://www.metacritic.com/browse/movies/score/metascore/year/filtered?page=5

I would say you have a pretty decent case of 'confirmation bias' - you think critics are corrupt, so if you find something 'they' rate low that you found average or better, YOU WIN.

That is simple reality - most everyone likes some stuff that is rated low to mediocre, and doesn't like stuff that is top rated. Such is life.
 
Joined
Oct 18, 2006
Messages
14,953
Not quite.

Videogame critics, yes, corrupt, totally and absolutely. Wanna good score for your game? Pay up. No money transfer? Your game score is doomed.

Movies critics? No. These can generally only enjoy in style over substance boredom and they don't receive $ from movie distributors for praising such stuff. They love when put asleep with a movie and I seriously doubt many movie critics can easily be bought like videogame critics.
There is nothing much to confirm or deny there. I've written previously (or ought to if misunderstood) that you shouldn't go with agregators from professionals when it comes to movies, but find a few professional critics that have a close taste to your own. In cases where you want to check should you watch a movie that doesn't feel that much interesting thus you want "a second opinion" before giving it a chance.

Another thing you might have noticed there is none of movies I disagree with metacritic is drama/war/history/biography. Unless recommended by at least two of my friends with rock firm arguments why should I go for such a movie, I don't watch that stuff nor care. Not any more, I did watch a fair share of these till I got to a point where I just can't stand any of it any more.
Luckily, there are plenty of other genres I love. Unlike the combo above, all can still induce the watcher's passion in me. It's that passion during a movie that makes me say rubbish, mediocre or great after seeing it.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Apr 12, 2009
Messages
23,459
but find a few professional critics that have a close taste to your own.

Yup. Absolutely agree ... and that goes for 'non professionals' as well - bloggers and forum-members. Know whose opinion matters to you and in which situations.
 
Joined
Oct 18, 2006
Messages
14,953
So saw star wars - the acting really wasn't bad but the script was like -5/10; it just made no sense. The actual presentation was worse; they went back to every old movie and felt they required a cameo of some sort right up to the next to next to last scene. While the first of the three had a cohesive (if contrived and full of 'yea right - disbelieve') story that flowed ok this last one was just a bunch of - well we need to include this and we need to include that moments (i'm not even talking about cameo but just specific action sequence). Pity - if they had taken the time to have a decent story given the acting and cgi it could have been pretty good. I'm not going to score it but rather i think i'll watch little woman next - that should be a bit better.
 
Joined
Oct 20, 2006
Messages
7,758
Location
usa - no longer boston
Spoiler tags, please. Some of us haven't seen it yet.

I really attempted opinion without referring to actual plot points. Surprisingly hard since I am loaded down with 42 years of being a huge Star Wars fan - but that load is lightened since I never thought any of them were very good as movies :)

That was a joke. He doesn't show up in the movie.

Also, Last Jedi is the best of this group of movies. Just the Casino scene was too long.
JJ should have continued what Rian Johnson started.
 
Joined
Oct 19, 2006
Messages
5,215
Location
The Uncanny Valley
I'm sorry, but modern movie critics just don't get it!! You need to consider Lucas' original premise for Star Wars. He wanted to re-create the old 'B' matinee movies he remembered from his childhood, which like pulp science fiction were there purely for ENTERTAINMENT. They were full of action, often mediocre acting, and frequently didn't make total sense, but they were FUN to watch. When I pay good money to go to a movie, I want to be entertained; I want to feel better when I come out than when I went in!! I don't need deep and meaningful with political commentary, sjw, etc, etc. There's enough of that on TV I can watch for free. Maybe I'm just an old fart, but that's my opinion for what it's worth!!!! :)
 
Joined
Aug 31, 2006
Messages
12,827
Location
Australia
Nod Corwin, that's a huge reason why I gave up on cinema quite some time ago. Keep your silly opinions and agendas to yourself, I prefer a coherent story that will entertain, not some lecture that conned me into paying to watch. I can always go back to university if I want that!
 
Joined
Oct 18, 2011
Messages
19,037
Location
Holly Hill, FL.
Maybe I'm just an old fart, but that's my opinion for what it's worth!!!! :
Age has nothing to do with it. Being the product of two centuries and more of institutionalized double standards, probably.
I'm sorry, but modern movie critics just don't get it!! You need to consider Lucas' original premise for Star Wars. He wanted to re-create the old 'B' matinee movies he remembered from his childhood, which like pulp science fiction were there purely for ENTERTAINMENT. They were full of action, often mediocre acting, and frequently didn't make total sense, but they were FUN to watch.
This director never hid he aimed at producing a modern myth, a US american mythology. B movies did not chase that goal.
When I pay good money to go to a movie, I want to be entertained; I want to feel better when I come out than when I went in!! I don't need deep and meaningful with political commentary, sjw, etc, etc. There's enough of that on TV I can watch for free. )

SW has always been political. Apparently, it is too simple to state being comfortable with the political messages conveyed in the first or six episodes. It must be that there was no deep and meaningful with political commentary, swj...
Too simple to state that the agenda carried in the previous episodes was tasted, it must be there were no agenda.

Superior minded people add. They are dissatisfied with simple things.

One of the biggest stones in the SW glass house: the destruction of the absolute evil figures like Palpatine and Vader. Under the umbrella of this absolute evil, people are comfortable, the question of evil is easily solved: not them.

Script writers do not work to write stories, they work to please their master, it is the american system of servitude.

This last episode confirms it: the left hole was too big, it had to be filled so welcome back Palpatine. Not only that, dynasties matter a lot in the american system and this episode managed to squeeze the reigning dynasty (Skywalker dynasty) out of the equation. The Skywalker were at the core of all the events.
Now it is learned that Palpatine, out of thin air, has descendents and in retrospect, his dynasty mattered more in the state of the galaxy than the Skywalker.

There obviously is no myth, it is a failure, myths are powerful stories that achieve their own existence, they resist modifications at a whim.
 
Joined
Mar 29, 2011
Messages
6,265
Last night I watched A Raisin in the Sun, a film I'd seen before in the late seventies but not since. I've also seen the play of course, and prefer that version but the film is certainly easier to view on your own time, and the actors are pretty much top notch. I'll not spoil anything here, but if you've never seen this movie, give it a whirl next time you've a few hours on your hands.
 
Joined
Oct 18, 2011
Messages
19,037
Location
Holly Hill, FL.
He wanted to re-create the old 'B' matinee movies he remembered from his childhood, which like pulp science fiction were there purely for ENTERTAINMENT. They were full of action, often mediocre acting, and frequently didn't make total sense, but they were FUN to watch. When I pay good money to go to a movie, I want to be entertained; I want to feel better when I come out than when I went in!! I don't need deep and meaningful with political commentary, sjw, etc, etc. There's enough of that on TV I can watch for free. Maybe I'm just an old fart, but that's my opinion for what it's worth!!!! :)

Well said. And to anyone saying it's always been political, that's such bullshit, just proves you're clueless. Edit: for the ~10th time, why is the retarded bot allowed on the forum, is it so hard to ban it?

The biggest problem SW seems to be having is both fans and haters taking it super seriously. I can even give some of the stuff in the new movie a break because to me it's not the focus, main focus is just a fun sci-fi flick.. Stormtroopers can't hit anything for example, it doesn't make any kind of sense, so why should everything else make sense all the time?
 
Joined
Apr 18, 2011
Messages
3,263
Location
The land of rape and honey
Rise of Skywalker 3/10

Terrible, truly terrible. Chock full of incredibly stupid plot inconsistencies - and seems to ignore almost all the opportunities set up by the previous film.

Tons of new characters - all of which serve no purpose.

Super chaotic and rushed.

Ending was beyond stupid.

Most definitely the worst Star Wars film out there - and seeing as I more or less despise the prequels, that's quite a statement.

But at least the prequels had a plan and a script that made a little bit of sense.
 
Last edited:
Ad Astra 7.5/10

I'm a huge fan of the director - and Brad Pitt is very good here. Better than usual, that's for sure.

To me, it's mostly an emotional film. A highly atmospheric film.

It's not big on interesting plot or compelling narrative.

It's a film about one person closing the distance to his emotions - the longer he travels.

Which is sort of neat, I find.

Anyway, a very potent experience for me.

Lighthouse 7/10

I loved The Witch - so I expected great things from this.

In a way, I got that - but, then again, not really.

It was very well executed - and the acting was superb.

But it didn't really do much for me. I got what it was trying to do - but I guess I just wasn't invested enough to truly appreciate it.

At least it confirmed what I always suspected - that Robert Pattinson is a fantastic actor.
 
I saw Rise of Skywalker last night.

Holy shitballs was that fucking awful! I thought people were exaggerating, but no, it truly is a terrible movie. Bad pacing, cringy (even by SW standards) dialogue, and nonsensical plot devices everywhere.

I pray that Disney never attempts to resurrect the Skywalker saga with any more movies. Please just let it be over.
 
Joined
Oct 21, 2006
Messages
39,394
Location
Florida, US
You know it's a particularly bad approach to SW when the 25 Iron Man remakes in a row approach of Disney Marvel compares favorably to it.

Unlike, say, the Alien franchise - Star Wars is unfathomably easy to expand upon and there's literally thousands of ways to make a compelling movie set in that universe.

But, instead, they choose to do a trilogy where the first and last movies are inferior remakes of the ancient past - and the middle movie (being the only slightly original one) is more or less ignored as part of the arc.

Oh well, at least we can look forward to 25 Disney iterations of Iron Mandalorian, now that the show has been so well received.

Wait! That's not a good thing.

In fact, this whole Star Wars travesty has turned out much worse than I ever feared it would, after Disney took over.
 
This director never hid he aimed at producing a modern myth, a US american mythology.
And he did. But then he grew up and stopped caring about anything except $.
Then sold it to anyone interested in ruining it. And then that party licensed videogames rights to EA as legal gambling isn't tax free.
The biggest problem SW seems to be having is both fans and haters taking it super seriously.
The biggest problem SW has is Disney.

The very same Disney turned movies into painful mediocrity or even worse rubbish thus the audience is not caring about SW movies anymore.
On the other hand, animated series Clone Wars is still cherished by that same audience and Disney wasn't prepared for a success of similar format live show. They planned something as retarded as movies yet exclusive to their holy streaming service noone needs then rushed the thing, fans brought their own cosplay outfits on set because Disney couldn't be arsed and baby alien dolls will appear at the market god knows when.

I don't plan to watch the movie you scored 3/10. Not because of that score, I just don't care about it. Unless there is absolutely nothing to do which is kinda rare in my case, I'll remain ignorant on it. All thanks to previous Disney duds.
But the Iron Mandalorian? Of course I will go for it. Love it or hate it, the word out there is that although silly and cheesy, it's not nearly as retarded as movies under Disney.
25 baby Yoda spin-offs. xD
+1 :D
 
Joined
Apr 12, 2009
Messages
23,459
Joined
Nov 5, 2006
Messages
21,964
Location
Old Europe
Amélie https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amélie
No other nation but the French could do that movie.
Not true as being human is not related to nationality. :)

It's like saying only Germany could film the brilliant yet criminally_underrated(TM)JDR Tattoo.
Are you saying you didn't watch it? Man… *sigh* :D
btw imdb obviously didn't watch it. This just isn't happening in the movie:
Two police detectives… hunt a ritualistic serial killer murdering people with tattoos and skinning them
LOL for incorrect summary, LOL for two interpretations possible from such line.
No rituals anywhere and detectives definetly aren't murdering or skinning anyone. :D

Anyway, we did mention Amelie in this thread before and it's one of the best "feel good" movies ever made. I'm not sure if we discussed this type of movies previously, but I wouldn't say no to a thread that would list only these.
 
Joined
Apr 12, 2009
Messages
23,459
Back
Top Bottom