Carnifex
SasqWatch
Great old games is throwing around some discount coupons for the first Elex, if you've not gotten it yet.
My only complaint with Elex was its length. Took me 100 hours to finish, therefore a replay is almost out of question.
Lol, long yes, too long no. I played it four or five times and have about 460 hours in it so your estimation seems right. This is the only game where I actively played all variations needed to get all 50 achievements.My only complaint with Elex was its length. Took me 100 hours to finish, therefore a replay is almost out of question.
Add me to the list of people who quite enjoyed Elex, but the punishing difficulty even on easy was a real turn off and I eventually gave up. Love Gothic 2/Risen 1 2 3 etc. Maybe I'll try Elex again but it is also a timesink of epic proportions.
They aren’t much in favour of creating some publicity around their game, are they?
Add me to the list of people who quite enjoyed Elex, but the punishing difficulty even on easy was a real turn off and I eventually gave up. Love Gothic 2/Risen 1 2 3 etc. Maybe I'll try Elex again but it is also a timesink of epic proportions.
I played it on all difficulty levels and can give you this advice if you find it too hard:Add me to the list of people who quite enjoyed Elex, but the punishing difficulty even on easy was a real turn off and I eventually gave up. Love Gothic 2/Risen 1 2 3 etc. Maybe I'll try Elex again but it is also a timesink of epic proportions.
A game that clocks over fifty hours at a minimum is a very good game, imo. The replay value there is very high.
Yes, but I assume he meant that a game that keeps you playing for 50 hours must be somehow good. Or is it usual for you that you play a game for 50 hours to find out that it is a bad game?I don't think using the time of 50 hrs for any game is a good enough to say that it makes it a very good game. Some games just drag on at the end where it becomes a chore to play….
Yes, but I assume he meant that a game that keeps you playing for 50 hours must be somehow good. Or is it usual for you that you play a game for 50 hours to find out that it is a bad game?
Yes, but I assume he meant that a game that keeps you playing for 50 hours must be somehow good. Or is it usual for you that you play a game for 50 hours to find out that it is a bad game?
I loved Witcher 3, it's one of my top 5 all time games, but after 50 or 60 hours, once you unlock everything gameplay-wise it starts to get monotonous. The main story and bigger side quests have good story, but monster contracts and smaller side quests are something you've seen tens of times by that point with little variation. If I could have only played the main story I wouldn't have fallen into that pit, but that is not how I play these games. I tend to do as much content on the first playthrough as possible.
For instance I am playing ghosts of tushima and it was an excellent game for the first 30 to 40 hours…now I am struggling to finish it as it is going on and on…
I would give it less of a score just because of that.