N
Nereida
Guest
That argument might actually have some merit if everyone who's played them had done it 20 years ago.
Well, the merit of the argument is that times change, and the only fair way to judge things is to take them in their own context. I'm fine with someone thinking that BG1 is the best RPG of all time. Their opinion is as good for them as mine is for me, of course.
I'm not so accepting when that opinion is imposed on me in a way that I can not have my own opinion because they have the BG trump card. My opinion is that whatever enjoyment I got out of BG in 1999 was great, and honestly I don't remember much of it. I can tell you it did not age well, at least for me. I can also tell you I've had a great time with a number of other games that to me are as good or better than BG, because they have objectively offered me many more hours of enjoyment, or because they have inspired emotions in me similar, or stronger than the ones that BG did. Those are the only tools I have to measure what I found enjoyable, trump cards be damned.
Again, someone can say "Well, in BG I cried with this NPC interaction, and this plot twist actually made me gasp, I spent the night sleepless as I got to play next day in almost depression at the loss, but then this plot thing happened, and I thought that was the most inspiring scene I've witnessed in any storytelling I ever read or watched" and I will believe them. I believe it can feel like that for them, and so be the best RPG experience they ever had. I respect that. Only that to me, it's different, and the blanket statement "BG was the best RPG and there won't be another like it for another 20 years" doesn't have any value in my book.