Vista-only DX10 a mistake

...according to Valve's Gabe Newell in an interview for heise online.de:

According to an online survey by Valve Software, only one in fifty players who access download service Steam has a DirectX 10-compatible graphics card and Windows Vista installed. In an interview with heise online, Gabe Newell, president of Valve Software, said that Microsoft made a terrible mistake releasing DirectX 10 for Vista only and excluding Windows XP. He said this decision affected the whole industry as so far only a very small percentage of players can use DirectX 10.

Click to expand...

More information.

What, that's news to this guy?

Yeah, duh, it's a mistake

I'll tell you what else is a mistake. Episodic content.

Well what it means is they spent some time implementing some dx10 into Source and they wanted to sell that to more people. Seriously, even the developers are moaning now.

Brother None said:

What, that's news to this guy?

Yeah, duh, it's a mistake

Click to expand...

Well the editor of PC World was only willing to come out against Vista because he was no longer the editor.

Now a major distributer feels secure enough to weigh in. I think this is very significant.

It's ok for some fly by night website to be critical but when you are in sales for a living publicly criticizing your vendors doesn't make a lot of sense. He's actually taking a risk.

It took Dell just to get us OEM copies of XP again until December, and they did it behind the scenes.

Lucky Day said:

It took Dell just to get us OEM copies of XP again until December, and they did it behind the scenes.

Click to expand...

And I'm sure they paid for it with Linux installs ...

But I also think this is significant - taking official stances against Microsoft isn't something that serious people in executive positions do lightly.

From a technical point of view I think one has to seperate the DX10 API from the "DX10" features of current graphics hardware.

The DX10 API contains some serious changes from DX9 - some of these are "logical" changes to how the API is structured, which could also have been done on XP, but they also introduced a new and improved graphics driver model that relies on new (very technical) features that *are* indeed Vista-only. It would simply be impossible, due to limitations in the XP core, to introduce those changes in XP drivers.

Now, regarding the "DX10" hardware features (I put DX10 in quotation marks because while the features are named after a certain API they are in fact "just" changes to the hardware) - those features could *in theory* also be exposed in a new version of DX9 if Microsoft wanted to. The problem is just that some of these new hardware features are so significant that it would require a lot of work to fit them into DX9. I guess that's why Microsoft decided to only add them to their completely new API on Vista where they could take advantage of the new driver model as well from the start.

Well thats not true according to this artical:
http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=40913

I don't believe there is even 1 dx10 only game yet so what do you expect?

Whats more steam is not totally correct on numbers as I have 2 machines one XP and one Vista and I can send either or neither to Gabe for his surveys. I'm pretty sure that I'am not the only gamer with both OS's. A simple partician and dual boot machine can do the same thing.

Edit:

"He would like to see controllers like the Wiimote or the Guitar Hero guitar." Oh please .

woges said:

I don't believe there is even 1 dx10 only game yet so what do you expect?

Click to expand...

There are *TWO* - Halo 2 and Shadowrun.

Of course, those aren't *really* DX10 games ... they are MS shovelware ...

Usually I dont chime into MS bashing, but in this case... I think it was a huge mistake. It made a split in the community and MS will catch a LOT of anger from people trying to force them to go to Vista and buy the necessary expensive computers. I am not sure if they will stick to this decision, but I will boycott Vista as long until no games work with DX9 anymore. This kind of policy can greatly backfire, and I hope their arrogance will get them what they deserve.

On a rational note, I didnt see any reason to make a new OS. Why should I change from XP, which now works just fine (as good as any Windows can run) to change to a new system, which makes nothing really better and only takes away MUCH more system ressources, so essentially its only a way to slow down my computer. It it were faster than XP on the same machine! But MS has a history of burderning its OS with LEGIONS of DLLs, EXEs and whatnot. Sometimes it makes me miss the old DOS or even WIndows 3.11 times, when I KNEW what was for what. They really should start to make their OS more slim, taking LESS ressources for the same abilities. Now THAT would be a REAL progress!

If Bioshock is any indication, you're not missing out on much by not having DX10 yet. I have been playing it on DX10, and then I played it with DX9 and I couldn't tell the difference at all. Of course, that could be because DX10 has just been added on after the fact. I am hoping that Crysis will be that one game that shows it off.

Well if you want better PC support don't go putting and designing your AAA titles for consoles then. MS and Gabe's stance on this is about money. Just as bollox as each other sorry.

Unregistered said:

I'll tell you what else is a mistake. Episodic content.

Click to expand...

Sam & Max: Season One.

Vista, for me, is a way for MS to break into the business and government worlds of backing up data. As I understand it, major corporations use UNIX technology to this. And Vista simply 'borrows' a bit from this UNIX technology.

Microsoft needs to make two divisions: one for regular users, gamers, etc. and one for business people. And MS needs to understand that regular users need an OS that will play their games (all of them, or 90% of them) withouit having to do all sort of things, first, like Turning OFF UAC and a bunch of other things...

Thaurin said:

Sam & Max: Season One.

Click to expand...

F T W

<filler>

Here's the previous discussion on this in regards to PC Magazine's editor

http://www.rpgwatch.com/forums/showthread.php?t=2473

aries100 said:

Microsoft needs to make two divisions: one for regular users, gamers, etc. and one for business people. And MS needs to understand that regular users need an OS that will play their games (all of them, or 90% of them) withouit having to do all sort of things, first, like Turning OFF UAC and a bunch of other things...

Click to expand...

That's pretty much the way it's been for a long time. You had 9x and Me *spit* for Joe Average, and NT for business/professional. Things changed with XP, which strongly derives from NT, and it's used for both home and business. Personally, I think XP's the best version of windows so far, even if there are things I completely despise about it -- but I'm still able to disable what I don't like (sometimes wielding the equivalent of a butcher's knife and sledgehammer to accomplish it, gutting the parts I don't like and disabling AutoUpdate to prevent it from "repairing" itself).

With Vista, they're again trying to make one size fit all, only this time it's like they're resurrected the sambling corpse of Me, spit-shined it with some DX10 polish, and pushed it out to everyone. And the parts that people don't like are so ingrained in the OS that removing them are not an option.

For the foreseeable future, the only version of windows available for knowledgeable users is XP Embedded, but that's not available to either Joe Average or power users like me. You need to be an OEM vendor to get it, and I doubt you'd be able to get most games to run on it.

I'm going to stick with XP as long as I can, since there really isn't an alternative. Macs don't exactly have a wide range of software unless you're doing multimedia work (or don't mind waitinga few years for PC->Mac ports), and Linux is not user friendly (with an install base that tends towards the rabid end of unfriendliness).

KasperFauerby said:

From a technical point of view I think one has to seperate the DX10 API from the "DX10" features of current graphics hardware.

Click to expand...

Nice to technicians to know this, but the average gamer only hears "Directx 10" and knows he can't run the game. Period.

And this is what sales affects. I believe.

and no, this was no mistake, is was planned by microsoft to have exactly this effect : forcing gamers to hasta la vista.

Thaurin said:

Sam & Max: Season One.

Click to expand...

Comes out finally boxed.

I'm not too happy about episodic content, but I regard this is a niche for smaller companies to stay alive.

Stanza said:

and Linux is not user friendly (with an install base that tends towards the rabid end of unfriendliness).

Click to expand...

It *has* become better with Ubuntu, the "puppy linux", as one arrogant poster in a thread in a far different forum stated.

I'm using Ubuntu myself.

Alrik Fassbauer said:

Comes out finally boxed.

Click to expand...

About which I duly gushed here ... I got the benefit of the individual games and then the ability to replay the whole season.

I read your review before, thanks.

It's being released here in Germany as well - fully translated - and I'm looking forward to it.