W40K: Inquisitor-Martyr - Released
- Thread starter HiddenX
- Start date
Chirp….Chirp…..and no one gives a damn except a few Watchers.
Just another Online ARPG that can't get it's launch right with working servers.
Just another Online ARPG that can't get it's launch right with working servers.
Last edited:
You already made it clear in the other thread that you have an agenda due to your personal dislike of the developer. There's no point in trying to convince others that they shouldn't like the game just because you can't.
Dang Couchpotato,they must have really pissed you off!
I'm off to patch the game to discover all my characters have been wiped I suppose.
This game is so much better then it was at early Alpha;good cutscenes and music and if I said anything else I would be giving spoilers.
The campaign is suppose to be much shorter then all the multiplayer features that are currently planned and some of it I heard is coming in a very short time.
You don't have to play the campaign in multiplayer but I like how there are extra missions in between the campaign to help fill in the gaps in your experience. They are usually harder so it would help to team up. I also like how you can pick difficulty levels for each mission you do which gives you more reasons to play at a harder level therefore rewarding you.
I'm off to patch the game to discover all my characters have been wiped I suppose.
This game is so much better then it was at early Alpha;good cutscenes and music and if I said anything else I would be giving spoilers.
The campaign is suppose to be much shorter then all the multiplayer features that are currently planned and some of it I heard is coming in a very short time.
You don't have to play the campaign in multiplayer but I like how there are extra missions in between the campaign to help fill in the gaps in your experience. They are usually harder so it would help to team up. I also like how you can pick difficulty levels for each mission you do which gives you more reasons to play at a harder level therefore rewarding you.
For 'games' where all the play is on a remote server (even single player); I have to ask myself how reliable is the server(ice) provider. In this particular case, while i like a lot of their games, reliability is not their strong point.
Yeah, I feel like we're starting to get flooded with Warhammer 40K games at this point. Unfortunately, a lot of them seem mediocre to me.
I'm liking a lot of what I see in this one though. I'd have already purchased it if I didn't have so many games in my queue at the moment.
I'm liking a lot of what I see in this one though. I'd have already purchased it if I didn't have so many games in my queue at the moment.
Carnifex
SasqWatch
These games that insist on players continuously being online for a single player game are just annoying. I'll take a huge pass on this one.
I'm not understanding why so many people are against online games. I personally only had a problem with Diablo 3 and some others because of their ridiculous password schemes that would get me locked out of my game usually when I hadn't played in awhile.
Martyr is running off steam and its turn on and go.
It's easy peasy. If it's servers are down then I play something else or do something else.
We are always on the internet anyways and its now the main way to get any game.
I do understand people with limited connections not liking the constant patching. That's what killed eso online for me.
Martyr is running off steam and its turn on and go.
It's easy peasy. If it's servers are down then I play something else or do something else.
We are always on the internet anyways and its now the main way to get any game.
I do understand people with limited connections not liking the constant patching. That's what killed eso online for me.
Carnifex
SasqWatch
I can only speak for myself, but my issue with online being necessary for a single player game....is that it is a single player game. If you need to be online to play it, simply label it a mmo or multi-player game, and have done with it. A single player game, to me, should function no differently than they have for the past forty years.
I happily feast on those that try to force changes down my throat. Wine and dine me first, at least.
I happily feast on those that try to force changes down my throat. Wine and dine me first, at least.
Cacheperl
SasqWatch
- Joined
- May 18, 2012
- Messages
- 2,315
I think you simply have different priorities and resources than other people.
Also, I think many people are fine with online games, when the online part is actually a necessary part of the game. Why else live with the evident drawbacks?
It is also not unheard of that game servers are shut down after a few years. There is no guarantee that they patch those games into an offline version. I'm fine with that in case of PoE, because its free.
- Joined
- May 18, 2012
- Messages
- 2,315
I don't think he's the minority here. Most people don't have an issue with an online requirement nowadays.
NeocoreGames gives a comprehensive explanation why those chose to go the online route here…
https://steamcommunity.com/app/527430/discussions/0/1473095965291684995/
It's not going to satisfy people who are dead set against not having an offline mode, but at least they took the time to address it and show that their reasons are valid.
I can respect their argument and reasoning, and I do agree with you that they took the time to address the issue. Personally I've played some "newer" Hack & Slay games and those were Dead Island, Borderlands 2, Torchlight 2, Grim Dawn and Path of Exile. The internet limited me in Path of Exile. I had server problems twice, one of those might have been with my local internet, but knowing that didn't reduce my frustration. Personally I found that very annoying, even though I thought the game was decent enough. I also don't care about daily events, coop, corrupted characters (I never had a problem with this), cheating, and all the other reasons that they have decided for making the game online only. I admit, I'm maybe not the target audience for this game, as I'd probably not buy this game even at full price, but I still haven't played Diablo 3, and that's probably because of its online aspect. I gave Path of Exile a chance, because it was free, and supported the developer for what I thought the experience was worth to me, which was far under the selling price for this title.
Yeah the same bullshit reasons I shared before. So nothing new here.
To add salt to his reasons.
Link - https://www.cheathappens.com/55358-PC-Warhammer-40K-Inquisitor-Martyr-trainer
So no need for a constant online connection,and you can still cheat.
Ding…Ding…what I've said about this game multiple times. This game is not a full MMO, and should not require you to maintain a constant online connection to play SP.
Yet no one listens.
Last edited:
mercy
SasqWatch
- Joined
- March 21, 2013
- Messages
- 3,456
Fun to see this big game get mixed ratings on steam with 1890 reviews and the amazing looking and smaller Adeptus Titanicus: Dominus gets very positive rating with 59 reviews. 
- Joined
- Mar 21, 2013
- Messages
- 3,456
ChienAboyeur
SasqWatch
- Joined
- March 29, 2011
- Messages
- 6,265
Watched a few streams. Same impression as when it was done before.
Another sign of the committment to SP.
Online connection generally is simply not a SP feature. It does not belong to it.
Another sign of the committment to SP.
Online connection generally is simply not a SP feature. It does not belong to it.
- Joined
- Mar 29, 2011
- Messages
- 6,265