|
Your donations keep RPGWatch running!
RPGWatch Feature - Black Geyser Review
May 17th, 2022, 12:07
Originally Posted by lackbloggerExcept there was nothing ambiguous about those comments. You're just projecting right now and looking a little foolish.
Wow, such interpretation, such amazing. No, the careful use of winks and words doesn't at all pertain to digs at the game, suuuuure. But then that's the glory of one-liners isn't it, they're always just ambiguous enough to mean pretty much anything you want, but as long as you get a keyword in with a wink, you know, job done.![]()
You're also acting like quite [removed] overall today. Is that clear enough for you or too ambiguous?
Last edited by Eye; May 17th, 2022 at 12:44.
Reason: Removed insult
May 17th, 2022, 12:39
Originally Posted by JDR13I'm projecting? LOL.
Except there was nothing ambiguous about those comments. You're just projecting right now and looking a little foolish.
You're also acting like quite [removed] overall today. Is that clear enough for you or too ambiguous?
No, that second sentence isn't unambiguous at all, it perfectly sums you up and illustrates my point. So thanks for yet another pointless "because I said so, because I'm JDR13!" contribution.
Now that you've got all that bully-man aggression off your chest, how about you talk about the contents of this cRPG?
Preferably in more than a shit one-liner

Last edited by Eye; May 17th, 2022 at 12:45.
Reason: Edited the quote
May 17th, 2022, 13:06
Originally Posted by lackbloggerJust calling like it is.
I'm projecting? LOL.
No, that second sentence isn't unambiguous at all, it perfectly sums you up and illustrates my point. So thanks for yet another pointless "because I said so, because I'm JDR13!" contribution.
Now that you've got all that bully-man aggression off your chest, how about you talk about the contents of this cRPG?
Preferably in more than a shit one-liner![]()
If you want people to take you seriously, stop getting so offended when others express a different opinion about the game.
Disingenuously trying to paint everyone else as trolls isn't making you look better in the least.
May 17th, 2022, 13:14
Originally Posted by JDR13Yes, I'm aware you are able to write shit one-liners to anything anyone says to you, we've established that. Well done you, you are the one-liner king of kings. If I had a trophy I'd award it to you.
There's that projection again.![]()
So how about talking about the contents of the game now?
Or do we just get anther one-liner

May 17th, 2022, 13:19
Originally Posted by lackbloggerHonestly, my advice is not to do reviews if you can't handle opposing opinions.
Yes, I'm aware that I'm projecting, but I'm just going to repeat the same tired line that I've been saying to eveyone who's opinion I haven't liked in this thread while I continue to be as disingenuous as possible. So how about we talk about the contents of the game now?
May 17th, 2022, 18:18
Editing quoted comments for anything but humor (that both parties are in on) is gross behavior.

SasqWatch
May 17th, 2022, 18:42
Originally Posted by JFarrell71If you are talking about me, I removed the insult. And I don't think me doing that is gross behaviour.
Editing quoted comments for anything but humor (that both parties are in on) is gross behavior.
--
Getting a YouTube video loaded and other BB codes, see this post
Getting a YouTube video loaded and other BB codes, see this post
May 17th, 2022, 18:55
Originally Posted by EyeJDR said "opposing opinions" but lackblogger quoted him as saying "contrarian opinions". But it could just as easily have been an edit by JDR. Happens to me all the time, someone quotes before I edit.
If you are talking about me, I removed the insult. And I don't think me doing that is gross behaviour.

SasqWatch
Original Sin 1 & 2 Donor
May 17th, 2022, 18:56
Originally Posted by EyeI think @JFarrell71 was referring to post #147 where my quote is butchered.
If you are talking about me, I removed the insult. And I don't think me doing that is gross behaviour.
May 17th, 2022, 18:58
Originally Posted by lackbloggerAh that makes more sense to complain about
I think @JFarrell71 was referring to post #147 where my quote is butchered.


SasqWatch
Original Sin 1 & 2 Donor
May 17th, 2022, 18:58
I'm referring to anytime someone edits a quoted passage to suit their own reply. I'm not talking about moderation in any way.

SasqWatch
May 17th, 2022, 19:01
Originally Posted by StingrayLike that?
Ah that makes more sense to complain aboutBut also kind of obvious that I'm a big dummy who thinks dumb things.
I'm not saying you're dumb. Just making a point. I don't think it's ever appropriate unless, as I said earlier, it's at nobody's expense. If you're quoting someone to respond to them, just quote them, the end. Putting words in people's mouths for yuks is bad forum behavior, in my opinion. Not everyone reads every post, for one thing. Quoted comments might be on another page from the original. Something that may seem obvious to you, having followed the conversation, may not be obvious to someone dropping in in the middle of a thread.

SasqWatch
May 17th, 2022, 19:04
Originally Posted by StingrayYes, the ol' "it's just humour" thing. Again, quite ambiguous really isn't it, individual interpretation and all that. But, again, using the word "obvious" while at the same time trying to make your whole point "opinions". Pick one and stick to it? *shrug*
Ah that makes more sense to complain aboutBut also kind of obvious that one is humor…
May 17th, 2022, 19:22
Thanks for the clarification. Usually things like that get accompanied by 'fixed that for you'.
The only time I read quotes is when having to check out a newly registered member; they sometimes hide their spam in a quote, hiding the link by using black letters.
I'd hate it if some of you started changing quotes as a way of giving/hiding an insult. That would mean extra time reading. So please, have pity on us, moderators ( @Corwin @Myrthos ), do not do that.
O and btw, you were lucky I noticed your edited post before having decided whether or not to give you a red card, @JFarrell71.
The only time I read quotes is when having to check out a newly registered member; they sometimes hide their spam in a quote, hiding the link by using black letters.
I'd hate it if some of you started changing quotes as a way of giving/hiding an insult. That would mean extra time reading. So please, have pity on us, moderators ( @Corwin @Myrthos ), do not do that.
O and btw, you were lucky I noticed your edited post before having decided whether or not to give you a red card, @JFarrell71.
--
Getting a YouTube video loaded and other BB codes, see this post
Getting a YouTube video loaded and other BB codes, see this post
May 17th, 2022, 23:30
It disgusts me how hungry people are for negativity.
Lackblogger posted a review, a genuine one. It shows he personally enjoyed the game and have only seen a couple of flaws. It disgusts me how the people who now call the review "poor", "lacks features of a professional review" etc. would defend a similar but negative review under the "freedom of speech / taste". No one should doubt: they don't like the review not because they find it unprofessional but because it's a positive one. And if they don't like the reviewed product for one reason or another, then they cannot accept that some others do like the same product. Even reviewers.
I haven't seen a single post in this thread that actually questions an ARGUMENT or CLAIM made in lackblogger's review. They attack the professionalism but don't dispute the claims.
Freedom of speech only exists for these people as long as they see their opinion voiced.
Misunderstood beliefs nowadays:
You criticise = you're important.
You criticise harshly = you're awesome. (The best example to this is Nereida.)
Lackblogger posted a review, a genuine one. It shows he personally enjoyed the game and have only seen a couple of flaws. It disgusts me how the people who now call the review "poor", "lacks features of a professional review" etc. would defend a similar but negative review under the "freedom of speech / taste". No one should doubt: they don't like the review not because they find it unprofessional but because it's a positive one. And if they don't like the reviewed product for one reason or another, then they cannot accept that some others do like the same product. Even reviewers.
I haven't seen a single post in this thread that actually questions an ARGUMENT or CLAIM made in lackblogger's review. They attack the professionalism but don't dispute the claims.
Freedom of speech only exists for these people as long as they see their opinion voiced.
Misunderstood beliefs nowadays:
You criticise = you're important.
You criticise harshly = you're awesome. (The best example to this is Nereida.)

Traveler
+1: |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
All times are GMT +2. The time now is 14:29.