Do you want user Game ratings? - Page 4 - RPGWatch Forums
|
Your donations keep RPGWatch running!
RPGWatch Forums » Comments » Polls & Comments » Do you want user Game ratings?

View Poll Results - Do you want user game ratings?

Sure, let's have it. 61 67.78%
No way 13 14.44%
I don't care 16 17.78%
Voters: 90. You may not vote on this poll

Default Do you want user Game ratings?

August 4th, 2017, 02:45
Originally Posted by Myrthos View Post
What I mean is how do you value several games that have a 70% positive score. Are they all equal? What if one has 30% negative and the other 40%. Are they still equal? If not, in what way are neutral votes counted?
And if they are not equal how is the list ranked with a game that has 70% positive with 40% negative vs a game that has 69% positive with 10% negative?
Well, the reader has to decide that for themselves. Let's take 3 examples.

Game 1 70% positive, 10% neutral, 20% negative
Game 2 60% positive, 35% neutral 5% negative
Game 3 68% positive, 20% neutral 12% negative

Game 1 has the highest positive score, but also the highest negative score. If I look at the reviews, I see 20% of the people hate it, because they think its too frustrating. I can judge for the texts that its an action rpg. I tend to get frustrated because of my general suckiness at that kind of combat, and skip it.

Game 2 has the lowest negative review. I read through the reviews and see that most readers think its a well crafted game, but few people would say its a classic.

Game 3 is a game that most people like. Some people are big fans. Others don't like for a variety of reasons, including the type of combat, or because the multiplayer part sucks.

Are they all equal? Of course not, because each game has its own audience. On the other hand a compilation of scores can give a pretty decent impression of a game. Its also can lead to interesting discussion like in sports. For example who was the better basketball player? Wilt Chamberlain, who so dominated the NBA, that they had to implement the 3 second rule just to limit him, or Michael Jordan, who won a massive number of championships? Who was the best all time American football quarterback Joe Montana or Tom Brady? Who was the best soccer player? People can compare numbers in this case, but since there are many variables one can always make an argument who was better one way or the other,
forgottenlor is offline

forgottenlor

forgottenlor's Avatar
Font of Useless Knowledge
RPGWatch Team
RPGWatch Donor

#61

Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Vienna, Austria
Posts: 2,224
Mentioned: 43 Post(s)

Default 

August 4th, 2017, 10:48
Originally Posted by Ripper View Post
That's what worries me, if you see what I mean. I don't care how they vote, or what the final score is, it's that we'll attract more people that are more motivated by influencing a score, than people that are interested in participating in a genuine discussion, which I think is one of the strengths of the forum.
I understand that, but a minimum like 50 posts or perhaps 100, requires quite a bit of stamina just to be able to downvote some games.
And if that person would just be spamming in order to get there, it would be noticed I would think. Besides that votes from banned people would be removed.
--
In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move. Douglas Adams
There are no facts, only interpretations. Nietzsche
Some cause happiness wherever they go; others whenever they go. Oscar Wilde
Myrthos is offline

Myrthos

Myrthos's Avatar
Cave Canem
Administrator
RPGWatch Team

#62

Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 9,522
Mentioned: 112 Post(s)
+1:

Default 

August 8th, 2017, 02:27
Pro is a 1, Con is a -1, and Meh is a 0. You can do lots of fun math with that! Though there's some scores people do and miss-label.

The biggest one of those: the game with the highest average is the best game. Nope! The people rating the game are the people who bought the game and took the time to at least start playing it. (If you want to know whether a game is good, you'll need to get a group of RPG gamers and make all of them play each of the games.) This score will tell you whether people getting the game like it, though. If that number is high and you think the game looks good, you'll probably enjoy it. If it has a low score, though, you better do some digging to see what the game is really like.

You can also pick out the divisive games from the just-plain-meh games. A game that gets 5 pro's, 5 con's, and 20 meh's is probably just an average game. A game that gets 20 pro's, 5 meh's, and 20 con's is a "love it or hate it" game.
--
The very powerful and the very stupid have one thing in common: instead of altering their views to fit the facts, they alter the facts to fit their views….
-- Doctor Who in "Face of Evil"
Zloth is offline

Zloth

Zloth's Avatar
I smell a… wumpus!?
RPGWatch Donor

#63

Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 6,719
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)

Default 

August 8th, 2017, 13:34
Why is 0 meh? Shouldn't 0 be okay and meh -1?
--
Toka Koka
joxer is offline

joxer

joxer's Avatar
The Smoker
Original Sin 1 & 2 Donor

#64

Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 21,873
Mentioned: 164 Post(s)

Default 

August 13th, 2017, 11:04
There could be a way to challenge an extreme positive or negative review, maybe from long time or high post count users. There could be a format in place to prevent extreme overreactions.

Personally I think publishers should be held accountable for releasing crap, often time developers are at the mercy of publishers. So there could be a separate category in each review to hold a publisher accountable. It's about damn time publishers start taking the heat, instead of the developers. These big publishers just buy up developers for their IPs then try to force out crap quality games. If they don't succeed they blame the developer and close them down.
--
Trust me, most of the names I have been called you can't translate in any language…they're not even real words as much as a succession of violent images.
Acleacius is offline

Acleacius

SasqWatch

#65

Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,772
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)

Default 

August 13th, 2017, 12:36
Originally Posted by Acleacius View Post
It's about damn time publishers start taking the heat, instead of the developers.
They do. Besides I think the responsibility is 50% to 50% or something like this. Publisher cannot wait for year until the game has been polished and all intended features have been implemented. It costs money for publisher. Developer should be professional enough not to create buggy product.
Lev is offline

Lev

Watchdog

#66

Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 228
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)

Default 

August 14th, 2017, 02:58
As long as there isn't Metacritic "This game crashed on my computer so I gave it a 0" lol. I know I rarely post anything, but I feel this community is more of a mature gaming group, so I would be interested in seeing how a rating system would work in this environment.
Last edited by Dreadzilla; August 14th, 2017 at 03:04. Reason: added more.
Dreadzilla is offline

Dreadzilla

Traveler

#67

Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 16
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)

Default 

September 6th, 2017, 07:11
I think it's a great idea. Been a silent observer on this site for years, but the idea of user reviews on my go to RPG site has prompted me to join. I like the idea of getting a quick consensus of what other RPG lovers think, especially for games I may otherwise miss.
Caiden is offline

Caiden

Traveler

#68

Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)

Default 

September 6th, 2017, 09:31
Welcome, Caiden! Nice to see you finally after all these years.
I hope we'll see a quick contribution on these forums by your hand too.
--
1. It's not what you say - it is the way you say it.
Lovely 2 minute video: 'Change your words, change your world'

2. Getting a YouTube video loaded and other BB codes, see this post
Eye is offline

Eye

Eye's Avatar
Eye Watch
Super Moderator

#69

Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,291
Mentioned: 53 Post(s)

Default 

September 7th, 2017, 12:20
I'm alright with it, though I would keep the post count relatively high. Fifty strikes me as far too low. And a written explanation more than a paragraph or two I would also consider mandatory. Maybe a little form that gets gets posted with the written text, where the author fills out his estimated game time, what platform he played it on and maybe even basic system specs for PC reviews.

Maybe even a little check box identifying review bombs for being easily offended by perceived political agendas.
Last edited by Capt. Huggy Face; September 7th, 2017 at 12:30. Reason: Typos and mysteriously incomprehensible writing in general.
Capt. Huggy Face is offline

Capt. Huggy Face

Capt. Huggy Face's Avatar
Aging Gamer
Original Sin 1 & 2 Donor

#70

Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 3,381
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
+1:

Default 

October 10th, 2017, 12:47
User game ratings can't hurt, IMO, though I'm more likely to go to Steam or Mobygames for them.
posfan12 is offline

posfan12

posfan12's Avatar
Watchdog

#71

Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 165
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
RPGWatch Forums » Comments » Polls & Comments » Do you want user Game ratings?
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT +2. The time now is 18:17.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
vBulletin Security provided by DragonByte Security (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2020 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2020 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright by RPGWatch