Metro Exodus - Being Removed from Steam

Silver said:
PC is largely an open platform and for them to compete they need to consider the service side and its a scant offering. .
Click to expand...

But what does having a game published on Steam (just one proprietary platform), have to do with the PC being an open platform?
 
Joined
Nov 8, 2014
Messages
12,085
Ripper said:
But what does having a game published on Steam (just one proprietary platform), have to do with the PC being an open platform?
Click to expand...

Steam recognizes that they are competing with piracy. If they fail to provide a better service than the pirates then they won't sell the game. This is why we have things like Steam workshop and cloud saves.
 
Joined
Feb 13, 2014
Messages
9,314
Location
New Zealand
Stingray said:
I'm not particularly keen on "exclusive deals" (kickbacks), but generally speaking, all gamers should be happy that the people who developed the game would get 88% of its revenue (via Epic store) rather than only 70% (via Steam store). Having some kind of obsessive-compulsive disorder about only having one game store app installed on your computer shouldn't trump the desire for the game's developer to get a much larger percentage of the money you paid for their game. That's a really sad attitude.
Click to expand...

Yeah Steam has a lot of loyalty. I think 30% was once pretty great compared to brick and mortar, but it's still a lot of money.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jul 23, 2011
Messages
55
I have a great idea hardware and Software branded PC's. Lets see how everyone who is a PC gamer loves that idea over open platforms. Different PC's only play certain games.

Lets see Microsoft,Steam, Apple, and am I missing anyone who would love this idea?

As for the retail side that 20-30% at a company like Walmart is well worth it. They push pallets of crap worldwide at cheap prices that make more sales for the seller.
 
Joined
Oct 1, 2010
Messages
36,317
Location
Spudlandia
Couchpotato said:
I have a great idea hardware and Software branded PC's. Lets see how everyone who is a PC gamer loves that idea over open platforms. Different PC's only play certain games.

Lets see Microsoft,Steam. Apple and am I missing anyone who would love this idea?
Click to expand...
Except that isn't what's going on here at all, there is nothing stopping anyone from playing the game except that they have to shop at a different online store. This is like finding out that only Babbages carries the game you want, not Electronics Boutique, so you refuse to buy the game because you only shop at Electronics Boutique.
 
Joined
Sep 26, 2007
Messages
3,467
Stingray said:
Except that isn't what's going on here at all, there is nothing stopping anyone from playing the game except that they have to shop at a different online store. This is like finding out that only Babbages carries the game you want, not Electronic Boutique, so you refuse to buy the game because you only shop at Babbages.
Click to expand...
It was a joke comparing it to the attitudes of buyers about exclusives that's all. As the further you go down that road what I wrote about might become a reality at some point.

Good intentions and all that nonsense.
 
Joined
Oct 1, 2010
Messages
36,317
Location
Spudlandia
Silver said:
Steam recognizes that they are competing with piracy. If they fail to provide a better service than the pirates then they won't sell the game. This is why we have things like Steam workshop and cloud saves.
Click to expand...

Sure - so that's something in their favour. But I'm still not seeing what that's got to do with the PC being an open platform, and games not being published on Steam working against that openness.

Certainly a great deal of general software available for Windows is sold directly by the companies that create it. I would have thought that the openness of the PC has to do with that freedom to sell your software however you like. If a software company opts to use a third-party online store, and chooses to use one instead of another, I don't see how that reduces the openness of the PC platform.
 
Joined
Nov 8, 2014
Messages
12,085
Ripper said:
If one company opts to use a third party online store, and chooses to use one instead of another, I don't see how that reduces the openness of the PC platform.
Click to expand...
Indeed, it's more a reflection of the openness, not something that reduces openness.

In this case I don't know if Epic paid this company some money to put their game only on the Epic store. If they did, then I don't know that I'm too fond of that, but...it makes perfect sense for a dev to put their game on the Epic platform for some limited exclusivity period and rake in 88% of the revenues of all the early sales (which is quite a lot for a game usually), then put it on Steam later to pick up the customers who have that OCD and refuse to buy games outside of Steam too. They'll only get 70% from those Steam sales, but will pick up some sales they might not have gotten at all otherwise.
 
Joined
Sep 26, 2007
Messages
3,467
Stingray said:
Indeed, it's more a reflection of the openness, not something that reduces openness.

In this case I don't know if Epic paid this company some money to put their game only on the Epic store. If they did, then I don't know that I'm too fond of that, but…it makes perfect sense for a dev to put their game on the Epic platform for some limited exclusivity period and rake in 88% of the revenues of all the early sales (which is quite a lot for a game usually), then put it on Steam later to pick up the customers who have that OCD and refuse to buy games outside of Steam too. They'll only get 70% from those Steam sales, but will pick up some sales they might not have gotten at all otherwise.
Click to expand...
Agree somewhat with you but I don't agree with the one year exclusive length. A better deal would be three to six months for initial sales, but I'm sure Epic wouldn't want that.
 
Joined
Oct 1, 2010
Messages
36,317
Location
Spudlandia
Stingray said:
I'm not particularly keen on "exclusive deals" (kickbacks), but generally speaking, all gamers should be happy that the people who developed the game would get 88% of its revenue (via Epic store) rather than only 70% (via Steam store). Having some kind of obsessive-compulsive disorder about only having one game store app installed on your computer shouldn't trump the desire for the game's developer to get a much larger percentage of the money you paid for their game. That's a really sad attitude.
Click to expand...

I'm not fussed by the number of clients on my computer because I use desktop links to launch my games anyways. I'm OCD in the way I like to organize those links through.

Generally speaking I think people don't want to have to think about which game is where and deal with different platform hijinks when they are time limited as it is.

There is probably a business opportunity somewhere for the ultimate game launcher that can organize that stuff for you from multiple clients.

I'm glad developers are getting a larger share through.
 
Joined
Feb 13, 2014
Messages
9,314
Location
New Zealand
From what I've heard from developers, if you want to make big sales numbers, you need Steam. The other stores are a fraction of what Steam does because of the loyalty.

It will be interesting to see what happens with Metro. I hope the deal with Epic is pretty sweet though because it's a huge risk.
 
Joined
Jul 23, 2011
Messages
55
Ripper said:
Sure - so that's something in their favour. But I'm still not seeing what that's got to do with the PC being an open platform, and games not being published on Steam working against that openness.

Certainly a great deal of general software available for Windows is sold directly by the companies that create it. I would have thought that the openness of the PC has to do with that freedom to sell your software however you like. If a software company opts to use a third-party online store, and chooses to use one instead of another, I don't see how that reduces the openness of the PC platform.
Click to expand...

I'm not making that claim. The PC is an open platform and Steam better realizes that than their competitors except for perhaps GOG by offering a superior service.
 
Joined
Feb 13, 2014
Messages
9,314
Location
New Zealand
Silver said:
I'm glad developers are getting a larger share through.
Click to expand...
I'm also glad developers get a larger share just hate exclusives. Even hate them on consoles. A better practice would be to release on multiple platforms instead of one.

Buyers then can buy it on the platform of their choice.
 
Joined
Oct 1, 2010
Messages
36,317
Location
Spudlandia
Silver said:
I'm not making that claim. The PC is an open platform and Steam better realizes that than their competitors except for perhaps GOG by offering a superior service.
Click to expand...

Fair enough. I still don't quite see how the quality of Steam's service realizes the openness of the PC platform better than others, but let's agree to differ.
 
Joined
Nov 8, 2014
Messages
12,085
The main problem with this is that it offers absolute zero to the consumer. From what I've seen, Epic is offering nothing to the consumer other than to potentially complicate his life a little further. This is all about the proportions of money earned by the publishers and distributors. It's not really my problem as a consumer to start with, and tactics like these exclusives only hurt consumers.
 
Joined
Sep 16, 2010
Messages
4,813
Ripper said:
Fair enough. I still don't quite see how the quality of Steam's service realizes the openness of the PC platform better than others, but let's agree to differ.
Click to expand...

Okay last reply I promise to clarify for you. The Steam service isn't about realizing openness its about providing convenience to the consumer and less hassle. Steam knows its competing with the freedom that openness provides. Thats all I'm saying.
 
Joined
Feb 13, 2014
Messages
9,314
Location
New Zealand
The way I look at it, the current scenario doesn't offer any immediate advantage to the consumer, but I think that establishing credible competition to Steam could, in the longer term. If Epic became as viable a choice for studios as Steam, their lower percentage cut could be quite disruptive. So, I would personally trade a bit more inconvenience in the short term, for a potentially improved state of affairs down the line. But then, I already dislike the amount of power Valve holds, so the case is an easier one for me to swallow.
 
Joined
Nov 8, 2014
Messages
12,085
Stingray said:
Except that isn't what's going on here at all, there is nothing stopping anyone from playing the game except that they have to shop at a different online store. This is like finding out that only Babbages carries the game you want, not Electronics Boutique, so you refuse to buy the game because you only shop at Electronics Boutique.
Click to expand...

Except its not like that either. We aren't talking about a store to buy the game from. We are talking about being tied to a client that you run the game from.
 
Ripper said:
The way I look at it, the current scenario doesn't offer any immediate advantage to the consumer, but I think that establishing credible competition to Steam could, in the longer term. If Epic became as viable a choice for studios as Steam, their lower percentage cut could be quite disruptive. So, I would personally trade a bit more inconvenience in the short term, for a potentially improved state of affairs down the line. But then, I already dislike the amount of power Valve holds, so the case is an easier one for me to swallow.
Click to expand...

True, but I'll be interested to see if that percentage doesn't creep up if they gain popularity and spend money on R&D to improve their client which currently runs far behind steams.
 
sakichop said:
True, but I'll be interested to see if that percentage doesn't creep up if they gain popularity and spend money on R&D to improve their client which currently runs far behind steams.
Click to expand...

I think it very likely would. But I'd take a fiercely competitive duopoly over a virtual monopoly any day.
 
Joined
Nov 8, 2014
Messages
12,085
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom