- Joined
- April 12, 2009
- Messages
- 23,459
https://www.dsogaming.com/news/ubis...es-crates-they-would-not-be-added-into-games/
Okay today too in war affected areas and natural disasters, but those are exceptions.
Internet crosses boundaries and ignores your alergia, you may move anywhere you want and will still be bombarded with all sorts of malware. Lootboxes are exactly that. A malware that needs to be extinct. And you, alone, can't possibly do anything about it. Except moving to only two countries that banned those which, when it's only two, is kinda complicated.
For not bullshiting like other companies who preach lootboxes are "player's choice" and other idiocies, Ubisoft deserved my respect.
In times of past, if you couldn't stand a government's amateurism that deteriorate or stagnate a society, you'd pack your bags and move to another country.in the next paragraph, Ubisoft’s support went as honest as it could get, revealing that the loot boxes are so profitable for the company that it makes no sense – business-wise – to not include them in its games.
…
"it means that some players end up spending more on our games than others and that does result in increased profits for us. It also helps us to put more money into new titles and to understand what players look for in their games. If players simply didn’t buy these crates, they would not be added into games in future."
Okay today too in war affected areas and natural disasters, but those are exceptions.
Internet crosses boundaries and ignores your alergia, you may move anywhere you want and will still be bombarded with all sorts of malware. Lootboxes are exactly that. A malware that needs to be extinct. And you, alone, can't possibly do anything about it. Except moving to only two countries that banned those which, when it's only two, is kinda complicated.
For not bullshiting like other companies who preach lootboxes are "player's choice" and other idiocies, Ubisoft deserved my respect.
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2009
- Messages
- 23,459