Carnifex
SasqWatch
I will continue to mock all Dragon age games not named origins, yet that one I'll continue to play forever. It's such an excellent game, and a tribute as to just how glorious the series could have been, yet was not.
Just call it BioWare Pre-EA and when the doctors still controlled the company. Since after the acquisition/merger by EA and the doctors left the studio, the quality shifted.I will continue to mock all Dragon age games not named origins, yet that one I'll continue to play forever. It's such an excellent game, and a tribute as to just how glorious the series could have been, yet was not.
DA4 was also finished a few years back but development was scrapped & rebooted for those online aspects that are now being pulled from newer games. Talk about idiotic.DA4 entered development in 2015 but was rebooted in 2017 to focus on long-term monetization, Schreier writes. This was the catalyst for Mike Laidlaw’s departure from the game, and development has reportedly been in flux ever since. A group of BioWare leaders has been fighting with EA to turn the focus back to single-player development and the game’s success is vital after both Mass Effect: Andromeda and Anthem both critically flopped.
I never understood the outrage from some people over ME3 and ME:A having a multiplayer component or DA:I having co-op. There's nothing that makes me think the single-player would somehow have been better if the multiplayer wasn't there.
Gen Y exists, but is usually called Millenials instead.Whenever someone says "boomer" I just think of one of those exploding zombie types that are in every zombie horde game ever.
I think I'm gen X. Apparently there's a gen Z? What happened to Y? Who comes up with these names?
DA:I's OK if you can ignore the filler quests. Might even be a better storyline than the original once you've got all the DLC. It's a way better game than ME:A and also, its filler is nowhere near as bad as ME:A's, although it may not look that way at the very start of DA:I.I didn't play much of Inquisition either. It didn't take me long to see it was packed full of generic filler quests in the same way as ME: Andromeda. At least I found the combat in ME:A fun though. I can't say the same about DA:I.
DA:I's OK if you can ignore the filler quests. Might even be a better storyline than the original once you've got all the DLC. It's a way better game than ME:A and also, its filler is nowhere near as bad as ME:A's, although it may not look that way at the very start of DA:I.
I don't believe that there is any reason to play DA2 before DA:I. I never played it and didn't feel like missing any story needed for DA:I.That means I'll probably have to try to get through DA2 too which I'm not looking forward to.
That's quite interesting, as the entire plot in DA: I is a direct consequence of DA2, such as Templar vs Mage and the origin of Corypheus. Also, characters like Varric are from DA2.
The entire series is Templars vs Mages. He'll figure out who Varric is easily enough.
I agree with bkreuger that there's no particular reason to play DA2 first, especially if you're dreading it.
The entire series is Templars vs Mages. He'll figure out who Varric is easily enough.
I agree with bkreuger that there's no particular reason to play DA2 first, especially if you're dreading it.