- Joined
- September 26, 2007
- Messages
- 3,474
Yep, it's kinda obvious that the main point of this new feature will be to shut down anti-SJW'ers.
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2007
- Messages
- 3,474
Yep, it's kinda obvious that the main point of this new feature will be to shut down anti-SJW'ers.
Giving reason to Steam censorship attempt then.Yep, it's kinda obvious that the main point of this new feature will be to shut down anti-SJW'ers.
In theory same for me, in practice I quoted I'm still influenced by the steam reviews rate to skip quickly on a game, sometimes it's hardly mindful, more like a reflex.When a game is announced or hits the store, I've quoted steam forum feedback numerous times as is more useful than reviews. Rarely though there is a review with crucial info about the game.
In other words, I don't care what's steam gonna do with reviews. Steam's major problem is shovelware that needs cleanup, not reviews.
Yep, it's kinda obvious that the main point of this new feature will be to shut down anti-SJW'ers.
Thought the same thing. Also wondering if Steam will do the same with off-topic positive reviews.
I wonder if this change is related to what happened at Rotten Tomatoes in the last few weeks, considering the timing.
Mass deletion of user reviews that according to them was a bug.What happened at Rotten Tomatoes?
To me, news that crappy comic-book movie is crappy is not very exciting, but was there something about this one that agitated the review-bombers?
I wonder why no-one has had the idea of focusing on "positive off-topic review bombs" ? Users err reviewers might actually hype a game … because they like it too much or because they've been paid.
I wonder why no-one has had the idea of focusing on "positive off-topic review bombs" ? Users err reviewers might actually hype a game … because they like it too much or because they've been paid.
It's a bit astonishing to me that it seems to me as if no-one here in this discussion has mentioned on this.
Female main character. They tried something similar with Black Panther last year but Rotten Tomatoes was pro-active about it and technically The Last Jedi was first (with added social harassment).
It's a different issue. That doesn't mean it isn't an issue - but the review bombing is a lot easier for everyone to see. (I wouldn't be at all surprised if some of the people pushing a review bomb weren't being paid by some competitor, though.)It's a bit astonishing to me that it seems to me as if no-one here in this discussion has mentioned on this.