|
Your donations keep RPGWatch running!
RPGWatch Forums » General Forums » Off-Topic » The last flight of the Space Shuttle

Default The last flight of the Space Shuttle

July 8th, 2011, 17:10
So this is it, the era of the space shuttle is coming to an end. I remember the first start and how fascinated I was. I can't help but feel a little sad - to see it end, without something greater following. Maybe I'm sad for no other reason than that the space shuttle was the only spaceship that ever looked like I thought a spaceship should look, and not just like an oversized tin can. I wonder if and how the next big step in space exploration will come about, current plans of NASA are not really inspiring enthusiasm. Maybe its the turn of the chinese and indians to drive things forward…
GhanBuriGhan is offline

GhanBuriGhan

GhanBuriGhan's Avatar
Wose extraordinaire
Original Sin Donor

#1

Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,508
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Fnord is offline

Fnord

Fnord's Avatar
SasqWatch

#2

Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 1,756
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)

Default 

July 11th, 2011, 15:24
I remember watching the first launch when I was a kid. I think the idea was great on paper, but I'm not sure it worked out like NASA wanted. I think they wanted a re-usable craft, which they got, the problem was it was only re-usable every 3 or 4 months. That said, it was a very cool era for NASA, despite the two failed missions.

There's no real reason to build a spacecraft that dedicates massive amounts of hardware and resources to support the environment for humans in space, when you can just use a basic rocket to get the job done.

If we're going to get to Mars, we need a heavy lifter type of spacecraft. Hell, I say dig out the plans for the Apollo rockets. The spaceship to Mars is going to have to be built in space over several years, and actual people are going to have to fly into space to do it. So instead of making one rocket (when one is basically a semi-truck to space that doesn't need human life support mechanisms), make one for the cargo, and one for the people that are going to have to handle the cargo already launched into space.
Sir Markus is offline

Sir Markus

Sir Markus's Avatar
Keeper of the Watch

#3

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Columbus, OH USA
Posts: 854
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)

Default 

July 11th, 2011, 15:47
Both sad and disgraceful. Amazing that successive administrations have screwed this up so badly that we now have no launch vehicles and are dependent on the Russians. At leas the private sector seems to be moving along. There are several companies that expect to have orbiters ready in a few years.
--
---------------------------------

"Ya'll can go to HELL! I'm-a-goin' to TEXAS!"

- Davy Crockett
blatantninja is offline

blatantninja

blatantninja's Avatar
Resident Redneck Facist

#4

Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,309
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)

Default 

July 11th, 2011, 16:01
I used to be disappointed, now I'm just jaded and angry - it's just another example of this country's growing inability to resolve its differences for the sake of the future. Nothing gets decided without waffling back and forth on an issue for months or years… and if a decision is indeed finally made, it has a good chance to be rescinded with the following session of congress.

And I'm really disgusted with the people, whether they bureaucrats or laymen, when say "current technology isn't enough to do such and such." I thought that was the point of R&D followed by experimental flights. Complacency for the sake of an easy answer sickens me.
Drithius is offline

Drithius

Drithius's Avatar
Laughing Gnome

#5

Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Florida, USA
Posts: 5,370
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)

Default 

July 11th, 2011, 16:11
Originally Posted by Drithius View Post
And I'm really disgusted with people, whether they bureaucrats or laymen, when they say "current technology isn't enough to do such and such." I thought that was the point of R&D followed by experimental flights. Complacency for the sake of an easy answer sickens me.
I agree. It's sad to think that it's been 42 years since we put a man on the Moon, and yet we're still not even close to a manned mission to Mars.
JDR13 is offline

JDR13

JDR13's Avatar
SasqWatch
Original Sin Donor

#6

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Florida, US
Posts: 32,638
Mentioned: 135 Post(s)

Default 

July 11th, 2011, 17:35
I think we're closer to a return to space and maybe a trip to Mars a LOT sooner than a lot of folks think, it's just the major legwork is being done by the USAF (black ops programs) and not NASA. We need a craft that can take off, go into space and land horizontally with reliability, and I'm pretty sure the Air Force has been working on such a craft. I could be wrong, but IMO there's no way in hell the US hasn't been working on a new space vehicle.
Last edited by Sir Markus; July 11th, 2011 at 17:51.
Sir Markus is offline

Sir Markus

Sir Markus's Avatar
Keeper of the Watch

#7

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Columbus, OH USA
Posts: 854
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)

Default 

July 11th, 2011, 17:59
I don't think the USAF is working on outer space. They *are* working on planes that can fly in nearly zero atmosphere, but taking that next step isn't exactly a trivial problem.
--
Sorry. No pearls of wisdom in this oyster.
Dallas Cowboys: Can we be done with the offseason? / / Detroit Red Wings: At least we get a new coach
dteowner is offline

dteowner

dteowner's Avatar
Shoegazer

#8

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Illinois, USA
Posts: 13,273
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)

Default 

July 11th, 2011, 19:59
Yeah, I doubt the USAF is interested in the moon or mars, but flying at nearly zero atmo is attractive. Maybe that technology could be used for NASA as well. A good buddy of mine is leaving NASA next month. Been there for almost 15 years. At one point he was the director of the MER for the shuttle program. When Columbia was lost, he had gotten off about 2 hours before and was watching the decent on NASA TV.

He told me around that time, that US manned spaceflight was coming to an end. As with any govt program, bloat and waste is a problem, but with NASA it was made even worse due to the prestige of the program. There is absolutely no reason to have separate NASA centers in California, Ohio, Alabama, Texas, Florida and the 5 or 7 others (can't remember them all). It's all politics to divide up the pork, but it ends up driving the price of things up as well.

He did some work on what was supposed to be the successor to the shuttle (Constellation), and he told me even then after they'd put a few years into it, that it was 50% at best that it would be completed.

Sad and pathetic.
--
---------------------------------

"Ya'll can go to HELL! I'm-a-goin' to TEXAS!"

- Davy Crockett
blatantninja is offline

blatantninja

blatantninja's Avatar
Resident Redneck Facist

#9

Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,309
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)

Default 

July 11th, 2011, 20:16
I know a few people who went down to the cape, JUST to see the last launch. Luckily, it launched on time! One of the few things I regret is not seeing shuttle launch. The best I've seen is an Atlas launch.

I think the cancellation of the constellation was a HUGE waste of taxpayers dollars. This is the problem, having a long term development mucked up by year to year politics in washington. Disgraceful.
Thrasher is offline

Thrasher

Thrasher's Avatar
Wheeee!

#10

Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Studio City, CA
Posts: 15,603
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)

Default 

July 11th, 2011, 21:12
Yup, same problem we had with the Super Conducting Super Collieder they started building in the early 90's in Texas. Spent millions on it, then killed it and for good measure destroyed the existing work so that it could never be started again. So now all that great research that could have been done here is being done in Switzerland. Good job politicians!

I wish I'd been to see the shuttle take off.
--
---------------------------------

"Ya'll can go to HELL! I'm-a-goin' to TEXAS!"

- Davy Crockett
blatantninja is offline

blatantninja

blatantninja's Avatar
Resident Redneck Facist

#11

Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,309
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)

Default 

July 11th, 2011, 21:27
Oh, I was SO annoyed when that was cancelled, too. grrrrrr!
Thrasher is offline

Thrasher

Thrasher's Avatar
Wheeee!

#12

Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Studio City, CA
Posts: 15,603
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)

Default 

July 12th, 2011, 01:33
I guess my point is that having both the USAF and NASA developing similar technology is a waste of money. I just am of the opinion that the Air Force and NASA are working on the next generation of spacecraft.
Sir Markus is offline

Sir Markus

Sir Markus's Avatar
Keeper of the Watch

#13

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Columbus, OH USA
Posts: 854
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)

Default 

July 12th, 2011, 02:34
Well Congress could have demanded that the military and NASA use the same technology, but imagine that, it didn't happen. The military wanted its own playground…
Thrasher is offline

Thrasher

Thrasher's Avatar
Wheeee!

#14

Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Studio City, CA
Posts: 15,603
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)

Default 

July 12th, 2011, 04:15
I'd say you're looking at two very different sets of criteria there. Ultimately, USAF is going to want something with guns or cameras. There's no advantage to taking military cargo that high, so it's pretty much guns or cameras. NASA couldn't give two hoots about guns, but is extremely interested in payloads. So, although there could be some synergies between two groups (which probably wouldn't happen, given the military's tendency to keep everything secret), ultimately you can't replace it with a single design group.
--
Sorry. No pearls of wisdom in this oyster.
Dallas Cowboys: Can we be done with the offseason? / / Detroit Red Wings: At least we get a new coach
dteowner is offline

dteowner

dteowner's Avatar
Shoegazer

#15

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Illinois, USA
Posts: 13,273
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)

Default 

July 12th, 2011, 05:39
Remember that payload sizes can be reduced to fit the launch vehicle, so height is not really an issue. A design that is reconfigurable to add more boosters or stages could meet the needs of all. But that would require cooperation between two agencies that want to preserve their own power structure…
Thrasher is offline

Thrasher

Thrasher's Avatar
Wheeee!

#16

Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Studio City, CA
Posts: 15,603
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)

Default 

July 12th, 2011, 11:06
Originally Posted by Thrasher View Post
Remember that payload sizes can be reduced to fit the launch vehicle, so height is not really an issue. A design that is reconfigurable to add more boosters or stages could meet the needs of all. But that would require cooperation between two agencies that want to preserve their own power structure…
I get what you're saying. I've heard of the possibility of mag-lev launch technology that wouldn't even need rockets. Small payloads, but dirt cheap once built.

http://techfreep.com/magnets-not-roc…into-space.htm

And I'll note the Air Force is responsible for this research. It may not be what NASA wants, but it's going to be what NASA gets, and who knows where the funding is coming from.
Last edited by Sir Markus; July 12th, 2011 at 16:49.
Sir Markus is offline

Sir Markus

Sir Markus's Avatar
Keeper of the Watch

#17

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Columbus, OH USA
Posts: 854
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
RPGWatch Forums » General Forums » Off-Topic » The last flight of the Space Shuttle
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT +2. The time now is 08:00.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
vBulletin Security provided by DragonByte Security (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2022 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2022 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright by RPGWatch