|
Your donations keep RPGWatch running!
Torment: Tides of Numenera - Interview at Dagon's Lair
February 14th, 2013, 05:14
Originally Posted by wogesFirst of all, thanks for skipping my post, pal.
Brother None, I know what you mean (i.e not a full blown sequel) but spiritual successor is also called a spiritual sequel. A spiritual successor is a 'sequel of sorts' or subcategory of sequel so they are not wrong just less precise in terms of definition. There is no wrong in calling it either unless it's for legal terms.
Second, what you write here is pure semantics. Deliberately misinterpreting or misplacing the intent of InXile is actually misleading to readers no?
Originally Posted by wogesSorry, but no. It's up to the individual to not deliberately misread and misinterpret what is actually intended. Obviously gaming media plays a role also to ensure myths don't get perpetuated. However, I've read nothing so far to infer InXile are making an actual sequel. It's both presumptuous and reaching at best to make this conclusion.
If InXile don't want it seen that way they should stop mentioning PST in interviews and hiring Planescape people to work on the game, oh, and calling it Torment.
--
Diddledy high,
Diddledy low,
Come brave blood sheep,
You've a goodly way to go.
- Brilhasti Ap Tarj
Diddledy high,
Diddledy low,
Come brave blood sheep,
You've a goodly way to go.
- Brilhasti Ap Tarj
February 14th, 2013, 06:04
Originally Posted by killias2I don't think most people would call FF games sequels except in the case of things like FFX-2.
Furthermore, since when do sequels have to be related in terms of narrative? Look at, say, the Final Fantasy games. .
From the Oxford dictionary: a published, broadcast, or recorded work that continues the story or develops the theme of an earlier one.
So, yes a sequel can be thematically linked but in the case of this title the themes are so high level (life/rebirth) that it would be reaching a bit to call it a sequel. I.e. It would be like calling Magician a sequel to Lord of the rings, or star wars a sequel to star trek.
Spiritual successor is the right word in my opinion.
--
Favourite RPGs of all time: Wizardry 6, Ultima 7/7.2, Fallout2, Planescape Torment, Baldurs Gate 2+TOB, Jagged Alliance 2, Ravenloft: The stone prophet, Gothic 2, Realms of Arkania:Blade of destiny (not the HD version!!) and Secret of the Silver Blades.
Favourite RPGs of all time: Wizardry 6, Ultima 7/7.2, Fallout2, Planescape Torment, Baldurs Gate 2+TOB, Jagged Alliance 2, Ravenloft: The stone prophet, Gothic 2, Realms of Arkania:Blade of destiny (not the HD version!!) and Secret of the Silver Blades.
February 14th, 2013, 09:23
Originally Posted by killias2The Final Fantasy games may not be direct sequels in terms of plot, but they are connected in a lot of ways. Many of the same items, monsters, weapons & armors, music, etc., are consistent throughout the series.
Furthermore, since when do sequels have to be related in terms of narrative? Look at, say, the Final Fantasy games. None of the mainline games are connected at all. In video games, a sequel often refers to a continuation of gaming mechanics/style/approach rather than a narrative sequel. I'm not sure why this couldn't apply here. It's true that I can't think of any notable exceptions in Western-style PC RPGs, but it still happens, even in narrative-heavy Eastern-style console RPGs.
I don't buy that just having similar mechanics or style is enough to consider something a sequel. For example, I don't consider Bioshock to be a sequel to System Shock, and I don't think many people would.
It's a spiritual successor, and I think it's important to make that distinction.
February 14th, 2013, 16:01
Originally Posted by JDR13Yes. And inXile agrees. Just important to communicate clearly so people don't expect it to be something it's not.
It's a spiritual successor, and I think it's important to make that distinction.
I can't stop you calling it a sequel if you want to, woges. It's just a correction, and it is more accurate not to call it a sequel, especially if you don't use "spiritual". Not much to debate there.
February 14th, 2013, 20:39
February 14th, 2013, 23:03
I'm pretty psyched for this as the Numenera setting looks like it will be fascinating to play in.
Check out some of the great preview art they've been showing on the official Numenera (tabletop RPG) site lately:
http://www.numenera.com/numenera-art/
This setting will be non-traditional fantasy for sure, more of a science fantasy / sci-fi hybrid.
Check out some of the great preview art they've been showing on the official Numenera (tabletop RPG) site lately:
http://www.numenera.com/numenera-art/
This setting will be non-traditional fantasy for sure, more of a science fantasy / sci-fi hybrid.
February 15th, 2013, 22:44
Originally Posted by MyrkrelThe stuff of bad dreams. I'm intrigued. This has become more interesting to me now that they've switched to a new setting. Looking forward to seeing what they come out with.
I'm pretty psyched for this as the Numenera setting looks like it will be fascinating to play in.
Check out some of the great preview art they've been showing on the official Numenera (tabletop RPG) site lately:
http://www.numenera.com/numenera-art/
This setting will be non-traditional fantasy for sure, more of a science fantasy / sci-fi hybrid.
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
All times are GMT +2. The time now is 10:45.
