38 Studios - Legal Trouble on Settlement

Couchpotato

Part-Time News-bot
Joined
October 1, 2010
Messages
36,179
Location
Spudlandia
Gamasutra has news the settlement might from last week is not the end of Rhode Island vs 38 Studios as a few of the Defendants have filed to stop the settlement.

Today the Providence Journal reports that two defendants in the 38 Studios lawsuit -- former Rhode Island Economic Development Corporation directors Keith Stokes and J. Michael Saul -- have formally objected to the first settlement in the long-running legal battle on the grounds that the state legislation which permits it is unconstitutional.

This is notable because it's the very first potential settlement in the 38 Studios case since the suit was filed in 2012.

The proposed $4.4 million settlement would be made by the insurance provider of defendants Antonio Afonso and his law firm Moses Afonso Ryan, which is a bond holder in the loan the state's development agency gave to 38 Studios to move to the state and develop its Copernicus MMORPG.

Though there are multiple defendants in the case, Afonso and his firm are able to settle independently thanks to a recent amendment to Rhode Island state law that allows a defendant in the 38 Studios lawsuit -- and only in the 38 Studios lawsuit -- to independently agree to a settlement with the prosecution, without thereafter being liable for any judgment made by the court against the other defendants.

Now Stokes and Saul are asking a Superior Court judge to block Afonso's settlement on the grounds that the amendment which makes it possible is unfair and will ultimately prevent them from relying on the insurance policies of their codefendants to pay their own legal costs.
More information.
 
Joined
Oct 1, 2010
Messages
36,179
Location
Spudlandia
I stopped following this closely about a year ago. But wow this still seems to be a huge disaster and every step forward they make, they leap back 10 leaps.
 
Joined
Oct 18, 2006
Messages
2,897
Location
Oregon
I'm not sure rewriting laws to fit the government's own ends should be considered a step forward. That kind of practice is always a slippery slope. Rhode Island legislators (like so many others, I suppose) seem to be quite comfortable on ethically shaky ground.
 
Joined
Sep 16, 2010
Messages
4,813
Back
Top Bottom