|
Your donations keep RPGWatch running!
Star Citizen Info Thread
May 26th, 2017, 13:48
We will need this to play the game properly.
And that money is the real reason why they aren't settling for "good enough" and calling it a day to meet a deal line and ship fast to make more money. Doesn't help that Chris is a perfectionist.
And every month I go with a bit of O_o over the game features. I would have find a Space Sim with basic feature like the old games pretty fine, now I'm getting some monster of immersion.
Originally Posted by NewDArtI would never have expected a crowdfunded game to get that much money.
I would never have expected crowd-funding to achieve this kind of stage.
And that money is the real reason why they aren't settling for "good enough" and calling it a day to meet a deal line and ship fast to make more money. Doesn't help that Chris is a perfectionist.
And every month I go with a bit of O_o over the game features. I would have find a Space Sim with basic feature like the old games pretty fine, now I'm getting some monster of immersion.
--
It's developer is owned by Sony which means it'll remain a hostage of inferior hardware. ~ joxer
It's developer is owned by Sony which means it'll remain a hostage of inferior hardware. ~ joxer
SasqWatch
Original Sin Donor
June 2nd, 2017, 08:59
Latest Around the Verse.
Haven't seen it myself yet - but it sounds interesting. It's about Item 2.0 - which is about overall interaction fidelity. Check it out if you're interested
Haven't seen it myself yet - but it sounds interesting. It's about Item 2.0 - which is about overall interaction fidelity. Check it out if you're interested

loading…
Guest
June 2nd, 2017, 10:17
Originally Posted by NewDArtWhat reasons for being sceptical? There's no reasons. Who told you there were reasons? The ignorance of some people is as endless as the cold vastness of the space not properly represented in Star Citizen but adequately so in the minds of its "already in too deep" pledgers. Vision is cheap. I'll tell give you a vision?
While I fully appreciate the reasons for being sceptical, especially if you're not following development closely - I'd say 3.0 should be a big help in alleviating the doubts of reasonable people.
Picture Chris Roberts in a dream-like field of dazzling stars announcing in a gentle voice "Alright, thanks guys, the supports been great but we've got enough cash now to finish the project and finish it much earlier than anticipated, thanks to you! All pledges are now closed and please look forward to our official launch later in 2014"
June 2nd, 2017, 10:19
Yeah, it would be great getting a game that's infinitely inferior a few years earlier 
Well, if you're the sort of person without vision.

Well, if you're the sort of person without vision.
Guest
June 2nd, 2017, 10:32
Is that all you got? 
If they released honestly they could have done another kickstarter for Star Citizen 2. But this was impossible because it would mean people playing SC1 and not wanting to back a cryengine space-ship total conversion mod again.
I reckon you could give $1k to a few students and tell them to mod crysis to have spaceships and it would take 2 weeks.

If they released honestly they could have done another kickstarter for Star Citizen 2. But this was impossible because it would mean people playing SC1 and not wanting to back a cryengine space-ship total conversion mod again.
I reckon you could give $1k to a few students and tell them to mod crysis to have spaceships and it would take 2 weeks.
June 2nd, 2017, 10:37
Originally Posted by SirJamesThis is kinda what I'm talking about regarding vision and being informed
Is that all you got?
If they released honestly they could have done another kickstarter for Star Citizen 2. But this was impossible because it would mean people playing SC1 and not wanting to back a cryengine space-ship total conversion mod again.
I reckon you could give $1k to a few students and tell them to mod crysis to have spaceships and it would take 2 weeks.

I mean, after what happened with SCL - I'm not sure listening to your take on how to handle development or how long things should take is terribly wise.
But to each his own, and all that
Guest
June 2nd, 2017, 10:42
SCL wasn't crowd funded. Probably should have been. Stretch goal: faithful tabletop adaption $500,000k … $150,000,000: we'll offer a subscription model to get 1 cockpit cosmetic a month for your $1000 ship.
| +1: |
Guest
June 2nd, 2017, 10:50
What was SC funding at when they decided to stop adding stretch goals because they couldn't complete them? What "reasonable" person thinks backing it beyond this point is necessary? Why do you need to follow it closely? Just to hear their excuses!
With no bullshit communication from the devs the reasonable man sees a 2014 release date and a game broken into separate mini-games claiming to be at 3.0 before it's rightfully had a 1.0 at launch!
With no bullshit communication from the devs the reasonable man sees a 2014 release date and a game broken into separate mini-games claiming to be at 3.0 before it's rightfully had a 1.0 at launch!
June 2nd, 2017, 10:51
It's not that your misinformed fantasies aren't interesting - but if you really want to be informed, I'll be happy to explain how development works for a game with vision.
But you'd need to create a separate thread for that, as this is dedicated to news about the game itself - not the fantasy version of it.
But you'd need to create a separate thread for that, as this is dedicated to news about the game itself - not the fantasy version of it.
Guest
June 2nd, 2017, 11:08
Also, imagine if SCL had had simply sold well. They released an expansion for free right before the developer closed from being broke. Added Warlock class and a new tileset for the editor, etc.
150,000,000$ wasted on spaceships and my only hope for an RPG I actually like is Knights of the Chalice 2 with not enough funding to add better graphics than tokens for the (N)PCs.
It's horrible that the last dev to do a D&D game died. Those AD&D gold box games were as good as it ever got.
150,000,000$ wasted on spaceships and my only hope for an RPG I actually like is Knights of the Chalice 2 with not enough funding to add better graphics than tokens for the (N)PCs.
It's horrible that the last dev to do a D&D game died. Those AD&D gold box games were as good as it ever got.
June 2nd, 2017, 19:05
Will the game have haircut option like the guy at the start?
--
Rush in and die, dogs…I was a man before I was a king.
Rush in and die, dogs…I was a man before I was a king.
| +1: |
June 3rd, 2017, 01:53
Originally Posted by NewDArtYeah but… wouldn't we be on our way to a superior Start Citizen 2: Star Mayor by now if they had gone that way?
Yeah, it would be great getting a game that's infinitely inferior a few years earlier![]()
--
The very powerful and the very stupid have one thing in common: instead of altering their views to fit the facts, they alter the facts to fit their views….-- Doctor Who in "Face of Evil"
June 9th, 2017, 08:03
New ATV 
Check out the UK development update - some pretty cool stuff there. The second part of the Item 2.0 report is pretty boring, though. I think we get it already.
I'm particularly looking forward to exploring some derelict shipwrecks in 3.0 (you can check these out at the 9:20 mark).

Check out the UK development update - some pretty cool stuff there. The second part of the Item 2.0 report is pretty boring, though. I think we get it already.
I'm particularly looking forward to exploring some derelict shipwrecks in 3.0 (you can check these out at the 9:20 mark).
loading…
Guest
| +1: |
June 16th, 2017, 11:54
Latest Around the Verse - talking about how they're approaching network technology and optimisation.
Also, it's the first time the two brothers are hosting ATV together
Also, it's the first time the two brothers are hosting ATV together

loading…
Guest
June 23rd, 2017, 08:35
Latest ATV. As always, the Frankfurt update is very impressive. I especially love the particle effects on vehicles and characters when in motion on planets. Brian Chambers remains the only nerdy dev who can read off the teleprompter without being unnatural about it 

loading…
Guest
June 23rd, 2017, 08:56
Mmm, serialized variables. Sounds riveting. 
I think we'll all be actual star citizens exploring the cosmos IRL before this game is finished.
Okay okay, that joke has probably already been used. How about…if the game falls through, at least they can maybe flip this into a webseries called Around the Verse? I got nothing.

I think we'll all be actual star citizens exploring the cosmos IRL before this game is finished.

Okay okay, that joke has probably already been used. How about…if the game falls through, at least they can maybe flip this into a webseries called Around the Verse? I got nothing.
Guest
June 23rd, 2017, 13:56
Originally Posted by FluentAs an aspiring game designer, you should really take an interest in how games work!
Mmm, serialized variables. Sounds riveting.
I think we'll all be actual star citizens exploring the cosmos IRL before this game is finished.
Okay okay, that joke has probably already been used. How about…if the game falls through, at least they can maybe flip this into a webseries called Around the Verse? I got nothing.![]()
You should give it a listen - as it's actually one of the most competent presentations I've ever heard about how to deal with a very challenging game in terms of the networking approach.
Guest
| +1: |
June 25th, 2017, 21:50
Could be in financial trouble, seems they went for additional loan from the bank, but offering everything Star Citizen related as collateral
From original thread:
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=1396987
From original thread:
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=1396987
--
Rush in and die, dogs…I was a man before I was a king.
Rush in and die, dogs…I was a man before I was a king.
|
|
All times are GMT +2. The time now is 04:35.
