Quantcast
Do you want user Game ratings? - RPGWatch Forums
|
Your donations keep RPGWatch running!
RPGWatch Forums » Comments » Polls & Comments » Do you want user Game ratings?

View Poll Results - Do you want user game ratings?

Sure, let's have it. 57 66.28%
No way 13 15.12%
I don't care 16 18.60%
Voters: 86. You may not vote on this poll

Default Do you want user Game ratings?

July 4th, 2017, 23:05
Here is another question about a potential feature: user game ratings.
What I propose to do is to allow registered users with a post count above a minimum to assign a rating to a game. This is only valid with a minimum amount of text explaining the rating. Whenever there are more than x votes an average is calculated and displayed for a game in the games section of our database and on an overall games rating page.
To encourage discussion I am thinking about integrating the explanations on our forums, but not sure if that will make it in.
--
In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move. Douglas Adams
There are no facts, only interpretations. Nietzsche
Some cause happiness wherever they go; others whenever they go. Oscar Wilde
Myrthos is offline

Myrthos

Myrthos's Avatar
Cave Canem
Administrator
RPGWatch Team

#1

Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 8,012
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
+1:

Default 

July 4th, 2017, 23:19
The Top RPG list is what drew me to the RPGDot from either No Mutants Allowed or the other one, Wasteland something. They posted they were going to game it because it wasn't registered and overnight it became the top game.
--
Developer of The Wizard's Grave Android game. Discussion Thread:
http://www.rpgwatch.com/forums/showthread.php?t=22520
Lucky Day is offline

Lucky Day

Lucky Day's Avatar
Daywatch

#2

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: The Uncanny Valley
Posts: 4,125
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)

Default 

July 4th, 2017, 23:25
Not sure about this. The site has great reviews already.
Perhaps user "vote" only for games in database that weren't reviewed?
--
Toka Koka
joxer is offline

joxer

joxer's Avatar
The Smoker
Original Sin 1 & 2 Donor

#3

Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 16,165
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)

Default 

July 4th, 2017, 23:54
Maybe, If there was some way to verify that the person rating the game has played it for a decent amount of time to form an educated opinion. I guess, even then I wouldn't trust them though.

We already have too many people popping in to threads of games they've never played to say how terrible they are because they don't like the dev, publisher, it has season pass, it has people that aren't straight, It's trying to be profitable, It's not the remake they wanted of a series they're passionate about, etc.
sakichop is offline

sakichop

SasqWatch
Original Sin Donor

#4

Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 4,195
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)

Default 

July 5th, 2017, 00:09
Sorry, but IMO lowering the score of a game that has season pass or anything already noted as annoyance by cracked.com and whatculture* is a valid point.
Not liking dev/publisher is not a reason to hate a game though.

-----------------------------------------
* - Cracked's 12 videogame annoyances that need to die:
http://www.cracked.com/blog/12-video…to-die-part-1/
http://www.cracked.com/blog/12-video…to-die-part-2/

- WCG's 10 Annoying Things That Are Ruining Modern Video Games (video):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d0cs5H58ZqM
--
Toka Koka
joxer is offline

joxer

joxer's Avatar
The Smoker
Original Sin 1 & 2 Donor

#5

Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 16,165
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)

Default 

July 5th, 2017, 00:21
Any game with a bear will get a low score from me
--
"From knowledge springs Power, just as weakness stems from Ignorance."
Hastar is offline

Hastar

Hastar's Avatar
Unspeakable
RPGWatch Donor

#6

Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Wolf Light Woods
Posts: 1,182
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
+1:

Default 

July 5th, 2017, 01:29
I voted 'No way', because I prefer the reviewer scoring a game.

And before someone asks me: even voting No, I wouldn't refrain from scoring a game I've played, should this feature be implemented (assuming my post count is above the minimum). But I'd really prefer the reviewer doing that alone.
--
Sou tricolor de coração!

Sie sind das Essen und Wir sind die Jäger!
Last edited by henriquejr; July 5th, 2017 at 01:41.
henriquejr is offline

henriquejr

henriquejr's Avatar
Keeper of the Watch
Original Sin 2 Donor

#7

Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Brasil
Posts: 1,200
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)

Default 

July 5th, 2017, 01:53
I wouldn't mind it. It could be interesting to see the Watch's general impression on RPGs we've played. Yes some people will give high or low scores to games for ridiculous reasons, but that's unavoidable. At least a min. post count / text explanation would prevents trolls (or developers) from drastically interfering with the avg. score. It seems like it would be a feature that is easy enough to filter out / ignore if it's not something that interests you. Might even be a handy way to decide which game in your wishlist / backlog to go for next.
--
Currently Playing: Expeditions: Viking
, NWN
daveyd is offline

daveyd

daveyd's Avatar
Keeper of the Watch

#8

Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: PA
Posts: 1,312
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)

Default 

July 5th, 2017, 01:59
I like the idea. The minimum post count should be pretty high though, at least 100 or maybe 200-300. I'm very interested in the average score from the Watchers, not so much from developers or trolls.

To be obliged to write some impressions with the score also makes it better. (And to be honest "SJW" or "UGOIGO" are not really good reasons for scoring low. Bears? Maybe.)
tomasp3n is offline

tomasp3n

tomasp3n's Avatar
SasqWatch
Original Sin Donor

#9

Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,777
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)

Default 

July 5th, 2017, 10:34
I can probably tell without seeing

But it sounds like another neat feature that won't do any harm.
NewDArt is offline

NewDArt

NewDArt's Avatar
SasqWatch

#10

Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 2,590
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)

Default 

July 5th, 2017, 10:54
The scoring at RPGWatch reviews isn't a numerical rating, so it isn't really comparable to user ratings. At RPGWatch we just have 5 possible categories a game can be in, with the highest category stating that this game is about as good as it gets in the current market even with its flaws (so it is not necessarily a flawless game) and the lowest one being that the game sucks, but there still might be fans that would like to play it. We use stars for this and don't do half stars. There are just the five categories.
So our 5 stars does not equal a 10, even though I realize that mentally a lot of people do this.

The user ratings would be numerical from 1 to 10. I'm not in favor of making things fine grained, so my suggestion would be to just have these 10 options for the rating.

As to the minimum number of votes, there are people with 1 post that can provide a balanced thoughtful review and score and there are people with 1000+ posts who can't even do that.
My view on including the minimum number of posts is to make sure that we have found out who the spammers are and have removed them from the forums in that time. So, I personally think that 100 is too high and 10 is probably to low.

In addition to that a score needs to be accompanied by an explanation of a minimum length (not sure yet what that length needs to be). In principle people can also dump an entire review in there if they like.

The suggestion to add the number of hours played is a good one.

It will be possible to update the rating and explanation later on. Perhaps this should be time restricted though.

The system will be moderated and abuse of it will lead to a warning and removal of that score and review, or eventually even a ban and removal of all your scores and reviews. This will also ban you from the rest of RPGWatch.
Note that banning someone because they misbehaved severely on our forums does not automatically lead to removal of their ratings and explanations.
--
In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move. Douglas Adams
There are no facts, only interpretations. Nietzsche
Some cause happiness wherever they go; others whenever they go. Oscar Wilde
Myrthos is offline

Myrthos

Myrthos's Avatar
Cave Canem
Administrator
RPGWatch Team

#11

Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 8,012
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)

Default 

July 6th, 2017, 00:33
I wouldn't advocate it. I think one of the problems stems from the small size of the community, combined with the fact that the name does have some amount of cachet. It makes it relatively easy and tempting to game the scores. I would avoid it, and rely on the tradition of proper reviews from credible people.
--
"Orwell was almost exactly wrong in a strange way. He thought the world would end with Big Brother watching us, but it ended with us watching Big Brother." Alan Moore
Ripper is offline

Ripper

Ripper's Avatar
Ngikufisela iwela

#12

Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 5,004
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)

Default 

July 6th, 2017, 00:47
For those nay sayers, again I repeat we did it before and it was pretty good, except for those idiots who think Gothic is somehow better than Ultima ]I[

There were problems of course, but the minimum post count should resolve that. There shouldn't be a big surprise.

However, number of votes I think should count for something. The newest stuff will always get more votes, and not coincidentally, attract more higher votes.

But I think a 1-10 score might be too low. The more votes the finer grain that out of 10 will become.

Regardless, it won't tell us a whole lot we don't already know, except for the occasional game an individual hadn't heard of or a sleeper hit not getting enough attention. (Or in the case of Dungeon Lords, to serve as a warning.)

That alone would make it useful.

But again, to reiterate a point, I bought Final Fantasy 7 based on the reviews, and possibly the score, on RPGDot. Boy, was I ever disappointed.
--
Developer of The Wizard's Grave Android game. Discussion Thread:
http://www.rpgwatch.com/forums/showthread.php?t=22520
Lucky Day is offline

Lucky Day

Lucky Day's Avatar
Daywatch

#13

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: The Uncanny Valley
Posts: 4,125
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)

Default 

July 6th, 2017, 22:26
About time!
mercy is offline

mercy

mercy's Avatar
Keeper of the Watch

#14

Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,273
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)

Default 

July 6th, 2017, 22:51
I voted "I don't care." In principle I find it a good idea, but I am afraid some users will give any AAA game a "1" out of principle, or any game with homosexual relationships, real time/with pause combat, dlcs, any game from InExile, or any other pet peeve I forgot. On the other hand you have this problem with Steam reviews as well. Here I always look at the text and see if I feel like I can trust the review. For example "frustrating because of hard combat" I usually ignore "but unplayable with mouse and keyboard" I find a legitimate complaint, but others might disagree. So I think forcing reviewers to write a minimum amount of text is a good idea.
forgottenlor is offline

forgottenlor

forgottenlor's Avatar
Font of Useless Knowledge
RPGWatch Team

#15

Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Vienna, Austria
Posts: 1,571
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)

Default 

July 7th, 2017, 04:08
If a game doesn't have homosexual peeves, then it can't be good, right

I'm cool with it. Make the post count at least 6300 though
--
c-computer, r-role, p-playing, g-game, nut-extreme fan
=crpgnut or just
'nut @crpgnut
crpgnut is offline

crpgnut

crpgnut's Avatar
Grumpy Role Player
Original Sin Donor

#16

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: St. Louis, Mo USA
Posts: 6,714
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)

Default 

July 7th, 2017, 10:08
I feel like the RPGDot version attracted undesirables (e.g. Lucky Day -- kidding! ), so my vote, worthless as it may be, is a no.
Korplem is offline

Korplem

Korplem's Avatar
Shipwreck
Original Sin 1 & 2 Donor

#17

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Pearl Harbor, HI
Posts: 1,015
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
+1:

Default 

July 7th, 2017, 10:45
I'm an enthusiastic "yes". I'm actually surprised to see any no votes… wtf?

*Going on a short rant*

The objections are very silly. Yes, people will review games according to their own tastes and criteria. *Gasp* And some of those tastes and criteria will be things you may not agree with. *Shocker* -- *More Gasps* Come on, seriously. Yes, this is how many people review games. You aren't able to control that, boo hoo. They might even view games that you love as crap, or vice versa… Gosh, how will we ever survive, in this world? *sarcasm*

*Rant over*

My suggestion is to base it on both post count, say 1000 minimum, and also length of time joined as a RPG Watch forum member. Say, maybe a minimum of having been here for 2-3 years, for an example.

P.S. And I realize I would be disqualified from posting review scores based on 1000 minimum post count, but it would give me incentive to post more often. I like this way of looking at it.
Arkadia7 is offline

Arkadia7

Arkadia7's Avatar
Keeper of the Watch
Original Sin 2 Donor

#18

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Pacific NorthWest, USA!
Posts: 917
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)

Default 

July 7th, 2017, 10:58
It's hardly surprising. There are people against everything they don't personally enjoy just on principle.
NewDArt is offline

NewDArt

NewDArt's Avatar
SasqWatch

#19

Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 2,590
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)

Default 

July 7th, 2017, 11:35
Originally Posted by NewDArt View Post
It's hardly surprising. There are people against everything they don't personally enjoy just on principle.
I hear ya. It just ticks me off, that kind of mindset. It basically runs smack into my nature, like a cat being rubbed the wrong way… it reminds me of game forums, and some of the arguments I'd see in them. For example, one or more, and in this case, many, people would request a feature in a game, and then other people would say they are against it -- for no good reason whatsoever. Let me give an example, one I have seen often, and that irritated me:

Person A -- Please, developers, can we have walking put in the game? It just feels weird to be running all the time, like a hyper maniac on speed.

Many others chime in, and agree, and say they would like this also.

Person B says the following (and a few others might join, but they are always a tiny but loud minority) -- Why would you want to walk, that is silly, you want to move slower in the game? What's wrong with you? I would never want that! Stop wasting the developers time with this silly request!

Person A responds -- Yes, I get that. I just like a slower pace for atmospheric reasons, but of course, it would be optional. If you don't like it, Person B, you could just always leave running on, and never use it.

Now, if Person B was reasonable, and intelligent and respected other people's freedoms and personal tastes, the argument would stop there. But, invariably, Person B is not, and keeps digging in, and arguing, and basically all because they want to control what the other peoples experience is in the game. And, by God, it better line up exactly with their preferences, and how they want it to be!

I just have a very negative reaction to this mindset, (basically, authoritarianism, and trying to enforce sheep-like behavior on everyone) and it makes me get the claws out, lol.
Arkadia7 is offline

Arkadia7

Arkadia7's Avatar
Keeper of the Watch
Original Sin 2 Donor

#20

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Pacific NorthWest, USA!
Posts: 917
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
RPGWatch Forums » Comments » Polls & Comments » Do you want user Game ratings?
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT +2. The time now is 05:09.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright by RPGWatch