|
Your donations keep RPGWatch running!
Kingmaker - New Race Added!
April 17th, 2018, 13:02
Voted Elemental.
--
My Backlog
http://www.backloggery.com/mattynoaa
My Backlog
http://www.backloggery.com/mattynoaa
April 17th, 2018, 14:02
I voted Hillary.
--
"From knowledge springs Power, just as weakness stems from Ignorance."
"From knowledge springs Power, just as weakness stems from Ignorance."
| +1: |
April 17th, 2018, 14:58
I think elemental is more interesting, but Aasimar is already an established PC race in D&D that many people like and may have old Aasimar characters that they are trying to recreate. So it doesn't surprise me that it's winning.
SasqWatch
| +1: |
April 17th, 2018, 15:02
SasqWatch
April 17th, 2018, 15:51
Originally Posted by JDR13Really? Vampires are truly the most cliche of all at the moment. So tired of them.
All of the options have the potential for multiple sub-classes. I'm not a backer but if I was I'd vote for Dhampir.
The other two otions seem somewhat cliche to me, and they're too similar to what's been done before in D&D and PoE.
Quite frankly, I'm shocked by the results so far. I guess the majority actually prefers derivative ideas.
--
How about all games have a single huge lootbox you pay for up front that contains all the options, items, skins, unlocks etc? I'd pay for that!!
How about all games have a single huge lootbox you pay for up front that contains all the options, items, skins, unlocks etc? I'd pay for that!!
April 17th, 2018, 19:03
Originally Posted by WisdomI was speaking in the context of these games. Fans of the IE titles and PoE are obviously the target audience for Pathfinder. That's why I mentioned D&D and PoE. There hasn't been anything very similar to Dhampir done before.
Really? Vampires are truly the most cliche of all at the moment. So tired of them.
Aasimar on the other hand are ripped directly from D&D and were a playable race in IWD 2, while the Elementals seem quite similar to the Godlikes in PoE.
| +1: |
April 17th, 2018, 19:18
Seems like a fairly minor thing - how much will the game change depending on your race? It can't be too dramatic, otherwise it would be unbalanced. I remember in D&D you had a levelling penalty if you played a more exotic race…wonder if they'll do the same or whether the changes will be cosmetic (and perhaps just limited to how other characters react to you)?
April 17th, 2018, 19:41
Originally Posted by boobooI don't think its so much the balance as how people want to see their character. Aasimars have been part of D&D a long time as others have stated, and I remember Josh Sawyer saying they had to put elves in Pillars of Eternity, otherwise they'd be crucified by elf fans. Who plays an elf because they have a dex bonus and are resistant to charm? I think the vast majority play elves because they are thin, beautiful, magical beings. And elf fans won't be happy if they don't play an elf. So there may already be a fan base for Aasimars, but not so much for the other races.
Seems like a fairly minor thing - how much will the game change depending on your race? It can't be too dramatic, otherwise it would be unbalanced. I remember in D&D you had a levelling penalty if you played a more exotic race…wonder if they'll do the same or whether the changes will be cosmetic (and perhaps just limited to how other characters react to you)?
April 17th, 2018, 20:15
Originally Posted by forgottenlorMe.
Who plays an elf because they have a dex bonus and are resistant to charm?
- Although I admit I wouldn't play a terrible demonic character regardless of of the stat bonus.
--
How about all games have a single huge lootbox you pay for up front that contains all the options, items, skins, unlocks etc? I'd pay for that!!
How about all games have a single huge lootbox you pay for up front that contains all the options, items, skins, unlocks etc? I'd pay for that!!
| +1: |
April 17th, 2018, 20:32
Thinking back about it, I guess all three races have a past history in D&D, it's just that Aasimars were always the most popular,perhaps not so much for their stats but because people liked the idea of playing a divine character. Genasi (elementals) were pretty popular in 4E as well, but I think it was more because of good stats and some cool powers than because people were attached to the idea of playing an elemental. Dhampir have been around in various forms since the days of 3E, but they were never a widely used player race.
SasqWatch
| +1: |
April 17th, 2018, 20:39
Originally Posted by boobooPathfinder removed level penalty because all races in PF get more bonuses so the bonuses that for example Aasimar got in 3.5e D&D is what all races get in PF.
Seems like a fairly minor thing - how much will the game change depending on your race? It can't be too dramatic, otherwise it would be unbalanced. I remember in D&D you had a levelling penalty if you played a more exotic race…wonder if they'll do the same or whether the changes will be cosmetic (and perhaps just limited to how other characters react to you)?
SasqWatch
April 17th, 2018, 21:38
I didn't vote because I won't play the game, but I played an Aasimar in NWN2.
--
c-computer, r-role, p-playing, g-game, nut-extreme fan
=crpgnut or just
'nut @crpgnut
aka survivalnut
c-computer, r-role, p-playing, g-game, nut-extreme fan
=crpgnut or just
'nut @crpgnut
aka survivalnut
April 17th, 2018, 22:02
Originally Posted by forgottenlorYeah, that's me
I think the vast majority play elves because they are thin, beautiful, magical beings.

I was leaning towards Dhampir (the description says they are also unusually beautiful creatures) because I was hoping it will change how the world react towards you somewhat but I've been told that's not the case. I thought, well then, I might as well stick with Aasimar since a half undead creature doesn't fit well in my good aligned party.
Guest
| +1: |
April 17th, 2018, 23:16
The half-vampire could be interesting. If you ever saw the movie Byzantium, the vampires were never described as such - they were human in most ways, except they didn't age, and they needed blood. One was good, and tried to only feed on the old and sick, as a way of gentle euthanasia. Something like that could have some great possibilities.
--
"I cannot define the real problem, therefore I suspect there's no real problem, but I'm not sure there's no real problem."
Richard Feynman
"I cannot define the real problem, therefore I suspect there's no real problem, but I'm not sure there's no real problem."
Richard Feynman
April 18th, 2018, 13:50
Originally Posted by Ripperwere they sparkly vampires? If not, they don't count!
The half-vampire could be interesting. If you ever saw the movie Byzantium, the vampires were never described as such - they were human in most ways, except they didn't age, and they needed blood. One was good, and tried to only feed on the old and sick, as a way of gentle euthanasia. Something like that could have some great possibilities.
| +1: |
April 18th, 2018, 13:55
Originally Posted by boobooNo, these were Victorian harlot vampires with tuberculosis. As they should be.
were they sparkly vampires? If not, they don't count!![]()
--
"I cannot define the real problem, therefore I suspect there's no real problem, but I'm not sure there's no real problem."
Richard Feynman
"I cannot define the real problem, therefore I suspect there's no real problem, but I'm not sure there's no real problem."
Richard Feynman
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
All times are GMT +2. The time now is 10:11.
