N
NewDArt
Guest
You're absolutely clueless d'Art. By the way it must be pathetic for a grown man that his "job" is reduced to browsing internet forums. Later, champ.
It is love, baby don't hurt me - don't hurt me…. no more!
You're absolutely clueless d'Art. By the way it must be pathetic for a grown man that his "job" is reduced to browsing internet forums. Later, champ.
Use Donnie Darko instead. To some, an infinite source of wisdom, the next Bible. To me, the biggest pos I've seen on screen, ever.
This whole thing Vogel talks about is the same reason why Tolkien lost the Nobel prize.
Actually Stein, I don't interpret the sentence the same way you do. I read that the person is constantly glancing at the sky because it is starless, hoping to see a familiar star pop out among the clouds. Nothing weird with that. If it actually was a clear night, he would only have to throw a glace occasionally right?
I do think the second paragraph is too verbose though, but that's more a matter of style. As is the wagons groping like you mentioned, wagons can't actually grope. But it works for me in this context.
It seems every few months we have to educate the young people who still think you can objectively establish the quality of entertainment
I say young because I'm such a kind guy - as I don't want to believe any mature individual who play a ton of games can really be that ignorant.
But I would then argue that the fact that what ought to be such a simple descriptive passage can be interpreted in several ways only illustrates the lack of clarity in the writing.
I don't think him using too many words has anything to do with it though.
Especially when you take into consideration that the winner had something like 200 pages, as opposed to 1.200 pages and 450.000 words in LotR.
But it is already clear: he keeps glancing because he is in a dangerous situation.But then it would make more sense to simply say that it was a cloudy night, and it would immediately be clear why he would keep glancing.
The text describes a dangerous situation. It is not a technical writing, the text can live with its ambiguities.But I would then argue that the fact that what ought to be such a simple descriptive passage can be interpreted in several ways only illustrates the lack of clarity in the writing.
Even in the best writings, the quality is uneven. Authors prefer to reserve the best quality for the moments they deem the most important.This reminded me of Icewind Dale II