ChienAboyeur
SasqWatch
- Joined
- March 29, 2011
- Messages
- 6,265
Valid observations are based on verifiable facts. If you have any information that others are not aware of, please post them here. Otherwise, it is using fictional "arguments" ( more similar to theology than reasoning).
So it requires verifiable facts to hold as certain that this product has a budget and that in a case of planned MU, a part of this budget is allocated to the developpment of the MU features.
There is a confusion on the burden of the proof. In this process, the effort of collecting evidences is balanced by a counterpart: providing evidences of will be met by something valuable in return.
It is not the case here.
People who prefer to think that this product developpment is not supported by a budget and in a case of planned MU features are not allocated a part of this non existent budget are welcomed to believe it as much as they desire it.
- Joined
- Mar 29, 2011
- Messages
- 6,265