- Joined
- July 7, 2010
- Messages
- 934
For a game that is regarded as having great writing, I am often left choosing a dialog option I don't agree with because there are NO appropriate choices. Particularly aggravating are the ones regarding Astarion.
#1 After attacking you in camp, you have the choice of killing him, or letting him feed and telling everyone he's ok!
I wanted to restrain and warn everyone that he's a vampire and to stay away from him. Keep him around in case he's needed for the cure, but if becomes too dangerous, then stake him.
#2 I met Gandrel who I can tell where Astarion is, or not, or just kill Gandrel.... excuse me, what??! Unless you are playing Evil, why would you kill a vampire hunter who's trying to rescue kidnapped children?? If I tell him where Astarion is (the moral choice) the rest of the party gets mad? If I don't tell the hunter where he is, I cannot follow this up with Astarion. He only talks about a third party I don't care about - where are the children, damn it!!
#1 After attacking you in camp, you have the choice of killing him, or letting him feed and telling everyone he's ok!
I wanted to restrain and warn everyone that he's a vampire and to stay away from him. Keep him around in case he's needed for the cure, but if becomes too dangerous, then stake him.
#2 I met Gandrel who I can tell where Astarion is, or not, or just kill Gandrel.... excuse me, what??! Unless you are playing Evil, why would you kill a vampire hunter who's trying to rescue kidnapped children?? If I tell him where Astarion is (the moral choice) the rest of the party gets mad? If I don't tell the hunter where he is, I cannot follow this up with Astarion. He only talks about a third party I don't care about - where are the children, damn it!!
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2010
- Messages
- 934