- Joined
- July 31, 2007
- Messages
- 6,408
- Joined
- Jul 31, 2007
- Messages
- 6,408
It's historically accurate, right? I mean, as in no fantasy elements whatsoever?Ghost of Tsushima was excellent imo. Really fun combat, great story, setting and exploration. Only negative and it wasn’t much of one was the collectibles and the repetitive tasks to acquire them. However if you don’t car about 100% achievements then you can largely skip them. Highly recommended to any ARPG fans.
Ghost of Tsushima was excellent imo. Really fun combat, great story, setting and exploration. Only negative and it wasn’t much of one was the collectibles and the repetitive tasks to acquire them. However if you don’t car about 100% achievements then you can largely skip them. Highly recommended to any ARPG fans.
Did you play the first one on PC? It was very poorly optimized, if I remember.God of War project being worked on not by Santa Monica Studios. Last of Us II for PC is being announced. GOW R coming to PC.
Same person who said back on February that GoT would be announced for PC in March 6th: Also... 3/20/24 It's almost certain that God of War: Ragnarok is in development for PC, because 2018 is already available, so the main doubt is the release date, which was provoked by the insider who...icon-era.com
Now TLOU2 is something I am excited for. Even if you disregard the controversial story, which I actually liked, the AI, gameplay, setpieces and encounters are so much more complex and better than Part 1 that there's no comparison.
And I really struggled on a controller. So I'm excited to get to experience it all on m&k with proper aiming.
Yeah, I played and really enjoyed it. Much more than the console versions.Did you play the first one on PC? It was very poorly optimized, if I remember.
Yes, there's no monsters or anything. You only fight enemies that would be appropriate for that actual era. Humans and some dogs. I usually find this as a negative as well, but the game is strong enough as a whole imo that it didn't really bother me. I don't know enough about the actual history to know if it's historically accurate as far as the events that happened.It's historically accurate, right? I mean, as in no fantasy elements whatsoever?
That's the only thing that gives me pause. I'm not much into games that don't have any fictional element. I like a greater variety of enemies than what a non-fiction setting can provide.
I'll have to watch that video. TBH, I never thought to compare the 2 as they feel very different to me, but I suppose if I think about it a bit there's some similarities.How does it compare to Sekiro?
Scratch that, I found a video by Fextralife outlining the differences. I'm only curious because Sekiro didn't really hook me, but GoT just might.
At a glance, they both are combat-intensive and in a very similar setting, have samurai combat style and jumping around the environment with a grappling hook. Superficially, they look very similar when you haven't played both.I'll have to watch that video. TBH, I never thought to compare the 2 as they feel very different to me, but I suppose if I think about it a bit there's some similarities.
I don't think if you disliked Sekiro that it's a given you'd dislike GOT. Sekiro imo is very gameplay and combat dependent, whereas GOT is more well rounded. It's combat is maybe a notch below Sekiro's in execution but is still very satisfying and the cinematic presentation can produce some " wow that was really cool" moments. Then it surpasses Sekiro in story and presentation. I think they provide 2 very different experiences despite any similarities one might be able to point out.