D
DArtagnan
Guest
In that case, I'd rather wait a few months and take a thorough look at upcoming changes. Revising the review now is kinda pointless as they'll no doubt keep patching it for a while.
I'm starting over with a new play through, and will construct a second look article or make further comments to the submitted review if it changes anything significant - I deliberately avoided talking about bugs in the review for this reason though.A new patch is out. Could you give the new features & improvements a try and include them in the review if they're relevant enough?
I didn't mean spending hours on the improvements. In most cases a brief look would be enough for an assessment.
Bugs should be mentioned if you ran into them and consider them annoying enough. If the only issue is a couple of floating trees, it's not really worth writing about.
The promise "we'll fix it later" should be countered with "then we'll revise the rating after the patch".
Anybody interested in writing a review about the indie RPG & survival mix Black Home - Vermillion Monastery ?
Homepage
YouTube video
Looks interesting, I wish watch did more of reviews of small games like this.
Sounds like a candidature for a reviewer's employment to me…
I'd like to suggest implementing "half stars" for future reviews. I don't think full stars only represent enough precision for a fair numerical score.
Am I alone in thinking this?
I'd like to suggest implementing "half stars" for future reviews. I don't think full stars only represent enough precision for a fair numerical score.
Am I alone in thinking this?
NO,NO,NO!!! You still don't get it!!!!! Our scores are NOT a percentage. 5/5 is NOT 100%. Please, READ what our scores mean!!
NO,NO,NO!!! You still don't get it!!!!! Our scores are NOT a percentage. 5/5 is NOT 100%. Please, READ what our scores mean!!
Dart, to some extent I agree with you. I'd like to see the scoring re-written since I have the same issues you do. All I was commenting on was equating those scores with a percentage.