Thrasher
Wheeee!
You don't know that. You must believe Zimmerman's testimony, which is laughable, considering he is a proven liar and untrustworthy…
That's called the ad hominem, congratulations you used it "properly".You don't know that. You must believe Zimmerman's testimony, which is laughable, considering he is a proven liar and untrustworthy…
That's called the ad hominem, congratulations you used it "properly".
Also we DO know everything. There's no defensive wounds on trayvon of any kind just a bullet hole. Whoops! Sorry you and txa can make shit up all day but it won't stand up in court (and didn't).
You're going to have to make up your mind. Either we don't know anything for sure (outside of the undisputed fact that Martin was identified by the closest thing we have to an eyewitness as the aggressor) or you've got your ironclad proof of racism. Can't really have it both ways.The thing is - it is at least as likely that Zimmerman initiated contact, meaning that Martin was equally doing 'what he felt was necessary to save his life'. Again, we will never know for sure. There was too little evidence to convict because it is circumstantial.
You're going to have to make up your mind. Either we don't know anything for sure (outside of the undisputed fact that Martin was identified by the closest thing we have to an eyewitness as the aggressor) or you've got your ironclad proof of racism. Can't really have it both ways.
Angered by new limits on ammunition magazines and expanded background checks, gun-rights activists tried to recall a total of four lawmakers but only succeeded in launching efforts against Morse and Giron. It was the first for state legislators since Colorado adopted the procedure in 1912.
This one was decided by the people, rather than the money.Reported contributions to Morse and Giron totaled about $3 million, dwarfing the amount raised by gun activists who petitioned for the recall, though some independent groups didn't have to report spending. Both the NRA and Bloomberg contributed more than $300,000 to the pro- and anti-recall campaigns.
Well, with unsupported name calling like that, I'm certainly convinced.
Back to point…
Interesting that initial news reports on the Naval Center attack talked about an AR-15 assault rifle, conveniently the same as used in Newtown. Somehow, as more facts come out, there wasn't even an assault rifle of any sort used. If the facts don't fit the narrative from the gun control fanatics, then just make it up as you go, I guess. Sad.
CNN reported as AR15 shotgun, knowing a shotgun was used! the magic AR15 connection continues.
Thing is, Mike, this isn't somebody writing down the wrong model number. Not only was the assault rifle angle created out of thin air, but the magical creation was somehow the poster child for assault rifle bans following Newtown. Even if we give it the slightest thought, reports were "3 shots fired". Sound like an assault rifle to you? If you're actually going to claim that this was an honest mistake, I've got some waterfront property in Florida for ya.Um, you are the one politicizing things. Details came out, we're wrong and got corrected.
Thing is, Mike, this isn't somebody writing down the wrong model number. Not only was the assault rifle angle created out of thin air, but the magical creation was somehow the poster child for assault rifle bans following Newtown. Even if we give it the slightest thought, reports were "3 shots fired". Sound like an assault rifle to you? If you're actually going to claim that this was an honest mistake, I've got some waterfront property in Florida for ya.