But that would mean its based on an interpretation on what an insult or discrimination is. Like i personally believe homosexuality is wrong. I dont have anything against people but i believe that act is wrong same way I find anal sex to be wrong because it doesnt produce life. But people are going to see that as discrimination.
It's not so much a matter of silencing your opinion, it's more a matter of what is law. Imagine 50 years ago and your opinion would have been normal and the opposing viewpoint being vulgar and illegal, would you have been complaining so vigourously in those circumstances that homosexuals cannot freely express their opinions?
Changing laws can sometimes involve decades of mass conversation, conversation that doesn't enter polite conversation until the law actually changes but finds other means to express itself. The general idea of this site is to not be an agenda hub for changing laws but to just discuss things in a lawful framework.
I mean, you could post a picture of an overthetop hardcore porn scene, like two girls one cup, because you personally believe that's your free speech in action, but every sense of logic suggests this isn't the place to be doing that, that's not what this site is about.
You can have lots of interesting conservative discussions if you want, but just relentlessly choosing topics/points which are at the extreme edge of the social consciousness because you get a buzz from seeing the resulting flak or because you are actually a blindly fanatical extremist is a different ball-game altogether. I have no doubt an extreme communist constantly espousing the benefit of social unrest on every thread would get fairly short shrift in much the same manner.
The conversation about homosexuality and how people as social beings are legally supposed to interact with homosexuality has already been debated and resolved for now, you should know how to behave on this topic. If you wish to make your stubborn opinion more than a subtle aside then you've got a few decades of activism to go through before your posts stop coming across as… well… promoting rebellion to the law rather than discussing current topics.
I personally believe pot should be a freely available product, but I don't bleat on about it every day on the Watch, how many times do I want to hear the same viewpoints being repeated? Do I need to rub this opinion in the faces of people who's only combined interest is computer games? Do I think changing one person's mind here will change the law? Well, no to all really. But if pot somehow becomes the topic for the day, such as when California decriminalised, then I'll be stating my opinion. Does this make sense to you?