magerette
Hedgewitch
- Joined
- October 18, 2006
- Messages
- 7,834
Just to interject a bit of pertinence, in relation to this review claiming the unpatched version is the reason for the reviewer's experience is fundamentally dishonest and just another excuse the author is using to justify his lack of professionalism and idiosyncratic dislike of the game. The patches that have been released since the day the game hit the shelves wouldn't have made any difference to his core issues with the game--IIRC they fixed a game halting bug in Act 5 and some video card incompatibilities, maybe a few other npc and quest bugs as well as stability concerns with Vista. He never made it to Act II, and the issues he describes with the graphics, interface and inability to understand the game were not substantially affected by either patch AFA I can see.
So really, whether he played the patched version or rushed through a review copy with bugs he doesn't mention is irrelevant to the main point of most people's objections to the incompetence of the piece.
So really, whether he played the patched version or rushed through a review copy with bugs he doesn't mention is irrelevant to the main point of most people's objections to the incompetence of the piece.
- Joined
- Oct 18, 2006
- Messages
- 7,834