JemyM
Okay, now roll sanity.
- Joined
- October 26, 2006
- Messages
- 6,027
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2006
- Messages
- 6,027
Just study Gothic III very carefully and do everything the opposite.
Some of what is said is done to make the articles interesting, that is for sure. But can any fan of the game *honestly* say that it isn't rife with problems? That it is something they'd recommend for their casual gaming friends? Heck, I've given two ofthe highest scoring reviews out there and *I* think it is my disappointment of the year!
I do disagree with the note about voiceacting and I think Gothic 3 should have won "Music of the year".
It's also got a pretty generic fantasy storyline, terrible voiceovers, lousy art design, a bad interface, and a combat system that relies as much on prayer and random chance as player input.
No, no, no, no, okay perhaps. Well, I guess 1 out of 5 isn't bad. I really don't agree with the first four and I'm not just saying that to defend PB or something. Bugs, performance issues and combat stunlock aside, I thought that all of the rest was pretty much excellent.
I also cannot see why the interface is terrible. It's pretty much the same interface as most games atm, with the quickbar in the bottom.
Some of what is said is done to make the articles interesting, that is for sure. But can any fan of the game *honestly* say that it isn't rife with problems? That it is something they'd recommend for their casual gaming friends? Heck, I've given two ofthe highest scoring reviews out there and *I* think it is my disappointment of the year!