They don´t vary much as, bugs aside, most of the public recognizes the game as at least good, but more often great.Amazing how reviews and taste vary across the board.
The only more notable variance seems to be stemming from how much the game´s level of polish is counted towards the overall opinion and how much bugginess is experienced.
So far I´ve played the game for 50 hours, had 3 crashes, one minor bug in quest logic, scorpion-y creatures stuck in terrain and few rare instances of dialogue lines not being voiced. On my medium rig the game runs completely smooth on max settings. Given how complex the game is, nothing dramatic I´d say. And I´ve played the majority of the game with two companions tackled along. At least when it comes to playing it on pc, this seems like an average experience, at least judging by this poll on Qt3:
http://www.quartertothree.com/game-talk/showthread.php?t=61820
Even though it may be more bugged for some, imo what really matters is we finally have a worthy modern successor of first two Fallouts and optimization issues aside, a great game on its own. No doubt it will receive more patches and it´s moddable on top of that so hopefully everyone will be eventually able to play it without issues.
So far I think the game is at least on par with Fallout 2.
RPS review is embarrassing.
Last edited: