If we take this as truth rather than yet another empty ivory tower platitude, then how do you justify your ongoing campaign for equality (bring up the bottom by stealing from the top)? Your entire structure is based on comparisons and you both recommend and take actions based on those very comparisons.
First of all, it might be helpful if you learned how to think objectively. Imagine that people actually mean what they say, rather than somehow wanting to appear as something they don't actually think they are. It's not interesting for me to try and "convince you" that I mean what I say, but for the actual exchange of opinions - we have to at least assume we mean what we say, or it's a waste of time for both of us.
Once you understand how that's helpful when communicating, then you might begin to actually read what the people you previously responded to with aggression and the "fill-in-the-blanks" attitude for all those words you really don't care to read, you will find that some of what I say makes sense - at least in some way.
My suggestion is that we share everything equally, because not everyone has what he/she needs. Once that is established, we can stop bothering about what other people have (ideally what they need) - because we all have our needs met. That's the theory.
Yes, I suggest "taking from the top" - not because of any actual comparison, but because that's the only place to take from. I'm not against the concept of comparing in its entirety. I think comparing what you have to what others have, as the sole basis for any need - is very unhealthy for us all. That's what I mean.
If we could somehow meet the needs of the entire populace, I wouldn't care about where any surplus went. The idea, though, is that people would stop caring when they understood that they didn't really need all those things - because happiness is about something else.
Just a theory.
Sounds to me like you're talking out your ass, although it's very pretty and uses lots of syllables.
Of course that's what it sounds like. You sound like your words should matter to me in a way that would make me think about whether you have a good point, and they will when you start communicating as I suggest above.