D
DArtagnan
Guest
I'm probably the only one on the planet, but I didn't care for any of them.
Check the post above yours
I'm probably the only one on the planet, but I didn't care for any of them.
'none of the above'. Played Fallout 1 after it seemed according to people here that it was the best game ever ever in the history of game making OMG! … and didn't like it. Then played 2 since 'OMG OMG Guys it's really the bestest of the bestest!' and couldn't even finish it, didn't like it either. Played FO3 after the whole world said 'OMG! I'm Super Serious! If you don't play this game you're like the meanest person in the world!' and didn't really care for it.
So, since the poll asks which is your favorite Fallout game, 2 people have voted "None of the Above", and the only one not listed is FO:BoS…
That means that FO:BoS is 2 people's favorite Fallout?
People on this site picking F3 is freaking me out. I thought RPGwatch as a collective hive mind had better taste…
F1 is the correct answer to the poll.
People on this site picking F3 is freaking me out. I thought RPGwatch as a collective hive mind had better taste…
F1 is the correct answer to the poll.
I am going to put in another nod for F3. It is an unabashed weird and fun experience.
gee let me think …
gotta say FO2 , I mean FO1 was fantastic and I replayed it a bunch of times but I loved 2 and still replay it today (have a game as a slaver which actually makes me feel bad.. unlike FO3 where I was just dying to sell all those kids to slavery)
FO3 is a piece on money making Garbage IMO but hey to each his own, some people like it when their choices don't matter in a RPG. but enjoy exploring in 1st person
Nah, some of us like the freedom to make our own choices, rather than being forced to pick between a few pre-written lines in a dialogue.
That said, FO3 had several important dialogue choices - if the illusion of choice is enough for you
The first two Fallouts gave you the freedom to explore how and where you wanted to just as much as Fallout 3. But there were greater consequences for how the player did that because they did not have the level-scaling that Fallout 3 had.
And no, the illusion of choice is not enough for me.
Um, did you ever play either of the first two fallouts? You have very little choice in what maps you go to, there is a specific order for quite a while before branching out.
The first two Fallouts gave you the freedom to explore how and where you wanted to just as much as Fallout 3. But there were greater consequences for how the player did that because they did not have the level-scaling that Fallout 3 had.
And no, the illusion of choice is not enough for me.
This is huge to me. I love Arcanum, but if Bethesda took that game and put the love in to it they did F3, it would just be better. Show me, in detail, up close, let me look up and down. While you are at it, remove the broken skills and add modern gameplay conventions. F3 is beautiful, at least as stylish and creative as the first 2, and with more content than both combined.… but enjoy exploring in 1st person
I have read the "glittering gems of hatred" lunacy, and there are some folk who put on menacing, aggressive internet personas at NMA and the Codex talking up particular old games like they were part of their own soul. They were good games, but they were flawed even in their time, and it doesn't get any better for them.
You mean you weren't aware that FO3 was developed by Satan himself?