Definitely not worth it if you're still playing @ 1080p. Even the 30xx cards aren't worthwhile there unless the ray tracing means that much to you.
- not worth in 1080p (which is my case)
They consume less power when doing the same amount of work - higher efficiency. I think that's what he was referring to. It's a big plus since it means less heat and less noise.I'm not sure where people are getting the idea that the new cards consume less power than the 30xx series. From what I've seen, it's about the same.
Yep, and it was so obvious to even the casual observer that it should have been a 4070 or whatever. Aside from the actual specs, I saw benchmarks saying that there was >20% difference in performance, and that's obviously not due to the amount of VRAM.They're trying to sweep their bullshit attempt of selling a weaker card under the designation of the stronger card.
I still prefer Nvidia's products, but I agree about the pricing. I'm upgrading my card at the end of the month, and I'm not even looking at the 40xx series. The price vs performance just doesn't add up there. Instead, I'm going to (hopefully) grab a 3080 Ti at a discount on Black Friday or Cyber Monday.TBH, if were surfing on Smaug's gold hoard, I still wouldn't pay Nvidia's comedy prices. Curious to see AMD's offering.
It's weird. Could it be because of a shortage of some components for a series of cards? When I looked, NVIDIA cards were sold out and other brands were above MSRP, but in Europe it's often the case.I've been checking on RTX 30xx and 40xx cards daily, and I don't get why many of them are still not MSRP. Nvidia's stock has been struggling, and they missed on their projected earnings, with one of the reasons given being that they have too much inventory that's not moving.
How can they have surplus inventory and simultaneously have many of their cards being priced above MSRP and/or out of stock?