Institutions was used instead of a better word.
There is no doom in holding voting contests. If a voting contest does not meet essential requirements, then it might not be held. As far as it is known, no one points a gun on the head of organizers.
When a voting contest does not meet an essential requirement like ensuring that each nominatee has access to the same voter pool, consequences apply.
A product with a three voter pool is much less likely to get elected than a product with a 80 voter pool.
Action and consequences.
Perhaps. Personally, I'd claim to be passionate about music, but I can't really imagine listening to an album I think is crap, and then writing a dissertation on what was wrong with it.
Like a lot, have fun with it people...
Always dismissing other people's way to have fun.
It is possible that a player bought a product, had little fun with it and actually got fun from writing the 8000 word long essay.
This option is obvious in regard have fun, like a lot. Yet, of course, it does not sit well with people with a supremacist background, who bear no other way than their own.
People writing reviews only when they like it work toward that goal. Understandly, people who somewhat recoup their money by having fun writing a review while not having fun do not work toward that goal.