ChienAboyeur
SasqWatch
- Joined
- March 29, 2011
- Messages
- 6,265
Some are so infatued with story that the smallest mispelling is outrageous...
- Joined
- Mar 29, 2011
- Messages
- 6,265
I believe the suggestion was to go and play "dating sims", not SIMS.I think people who say "go play SIMS if you want romance/relationships" are really missing the point.
I believe you can imagine what happens after all those ME3 plotholes. Something like this:Some are so infatued with story that the smallest mispelling is outrageous…
I don't think a significant amount of gamers would stop purchasing Bioware titles if they suddenly cut back on the romancing.
… you haven't seen forums, have you?
I don't know any statistics, but it may well be that Bioware (and other publishers) wants to broaden its target audience for RPGs. I hope this won't lead to a sexism debate, but it could well be, that Bioware stats show that female gamers really are into romances. The vast majority of RPG gamers today still are male gamers. So maybe by investing in romances Bioware wants to get through to the girls to get new customers.
But when it comes to Bioware writing and characters, I could take it or leave it.
Per that definition, I'm not a gamer.
And it's true, I don't care for the gameplay much. It can be silly, clunky, crappy, but if the story is good, I'll forgive it. But if the story sucks, no matter how stellar the gameplay mechanics are, I won'tplayfinish the game.
Now I need to find out what exactly I am.
You are still wrong Chien. Being a womanizer is a trait and traits of any kind do actually add to the depth of a PC. The more the better of course.
I believe the suggestion was to go and play "dating sims", not SIMS.
If you plan to do a romance in SIMS, you'll be very disappointed - no matter how silly one may feel about RPG romances, the SIMS ones are even worse than rediculing with your character in Fable games to get some love.
In the Witcher's case, being a womanizer is a trait and a personality trait. It has no relationship to the role as a witcher so to speak. When players state they romance people for the role playing sake, they do not do it for the roleplaying sake as the witcher role calls not for romancing.
Certain roles could call for romancing. Witcher is not of those roles.
Witchers are sterile and they approach that condition differently. The character gerald is a womanizer, unrelated to his role as a witcher. There is zero role playing by conforming to the character Gerald.
My concern is that "will there be bromances in Dragon Age 3?"
My concern is that "will there be bromances in Dragon Age 3?". Will every relationship have to have a sexual connotation to it?
No, that's why we need bromances, which are non-sexual relationships.My concern is that "will there be bromances in Dragon Age 3?". Will every relationship have to have a sexual connotation to it?