Carnifex
SasqWatch
The truly pathetic part being, at least one fool will actually purchase this thing. I bet.
Why, was it a site for Incels?Of course it was someone on The Codex who pointed it out.
Which posting?
Reminds me of the story, where somebody visits a psychologist:
Patient: My problem is, that everybody ignores me.
Psychologist: Who is next, please?
Why, was it a site for Incels?
Well, in a way most things are political. And I also assumed he meant it like that, but I'm not sure. He enjoys semi trolling sometimes, and sometimes jokes, and sometimes it's serious. It's hard to know with him sometimes.
I got an "infraction" in another forum because I bitterly complained about the lack of "colours" in games ... and in gaming in general ...
Someone apparingly thought I meant "coloured people" or something. Next time I write "blue, green, yellow, red" instead ...
Are you sure you didn't get the infraction because of an unacceptable lack of taste?I got an "infraction" in another forum because I bitterly complained about the lack of "colours" in games … and in gaming in general …
Someone apparingly thought I meant "coloured people" or something. Next time I write "blue, green, yellow, red" instead …
People only play what has the most powah. It's a man's thing. In a patriarchate, men are supposed to be strong, not weak. Therefore in video games they assume strong roles, not weak ones. Which has resulted in game titles like "Godslayer" or even "Godeater", because of powah.
This will only go away once men begin to emancipate themselves from the roles the patriarchates press them into.
For exaple, artists as playable classes in games ? Even the (A)D&D Bard is - at least in this video game - a fighting class ! Everything becomes streamlined into a class of power. Fighting = executing power.
That's why there are no non-combat classes in video games at all. No artist classes, no social classes, no jester classes. Because the patriarchate presses men into playing classes with power. And jesters don't have power, because they are social classes, and social = nonpower.
In the recent age of games emphasizing manlihood (just look at the game box covers !), it is even so that social classes, yes even social behaviour ! is considered as weak and womenlike. Social = weak = women. Which is almost like racism.
(Same goes for colourfulness,m but that's a different topic.)
Good point about sunglasses! I thought it was simply the fact of being partly hidden and thus looking a bit mysterious - in which case hiding behind long hair should work too.Pibbur wrote in the Corona thread about looking better the more his hair hides his face. That made me think about something I read a few years ago: Apparently a reason why people look better in sunglasses is because it hides parts of their face and make them appear more symmetric. Maybe facial hair fills that role as well? Apart from being trendy and making the chin look larger of course…
Good point about sunglasses! I thought it was simply the fact of being partly hidden and thus looking a bit mysterious - in which case hiding behind long hair should work too.
I'm not sure about the symmetry for unkempt hair though, "savage" is the word that springs to mind instead (or "chewbacca") - but that may work too.
I know next to nothing about zz top, except they have large beards. What song is it, and what's it saying about sunglasses?Sunglasses ? Reminds me of a certain song by ZZ Top …
I know next to nothing about zz top, except they have large beards. What song is it, and what's it saying about sunglasses?