I don't have time right now to do a full post but when you have something like
"a thief is still a scum sucking thief, nothing more than a parasite on the rest of us. Stealing is stealing, and they knew how to deal with that in the old days, you wack off a few fingers or limbs and people got the message right-quick."
This is just complaining because they feel like it.
While stealing may be stealing, piracy is NOT stealing because no one is deprived of their original. This is the first point you have to argue in the piracy debate. Everyone educated on the issue knows this. This guy is clearly not educated on the issue and just says what he's been told without thinking enough about it to be excited to present his inspired arguments.
It's safe and easy to hide behind the rules, but sometimes things are not so black and white…
For example,
“Today the path to total dictatorship in the U.S. can be laid by strictly legal means… We have a well-organized political-action group in this country, determined to destroy our Constitution and establish a one-party state… It operates secretly, silently, continuously to transform our Government… This ruthless power-seeking elite is a disease of our century… This group…is answerable neither to the President, the Congress, nor the courts. It is practically irremovable.” – Senator William Jenner, 1954 speech
I'd say all these new "anti-terror" laws have well and truly legally destroyed Americas constitution. Surely even people as sheltered as you lot have heard of all this unconstitutional spying and such? This rabbit hole goes very deep, but it's a clear example of how something which is legal is not necessarily good…