Thank you for your kind words and sorry for this stupid bug. It's an oversight on our part since we got so used to the game that testing it as a clean install we didn't even notice that. Check out this review: I posted it yesterday in our socials, that's really flattering: http://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561197971640510/recommended/246760/
.
I think the game should be played on Normal difficulty to enjoy it the most for new players. I really enjoy a good long epic rpg/tactical rpg. When i finish the game in another 3 weeks or so i will know exactly how detailed it is your game is a big achievement and your hard work should be rewarded with alot of steam sales =]
Any reviewers who played up to chapter 5 would never rate this lower than 80-90.
Quote: IGN wrote: "Legends of Eisenwald is a tactical RPG that gets fast turn-based tactical combat right". Still 73 but he didn't get past chapter 3 unfortunately.
Thats a shame hes supposed to be a professional gaming journalist, he didnt even play 30% of the game but decided to rate the whole game overall a score, pretty messed up. Gamespot would do better to allow their reviewers to take longer to review games.
His stupidity would overall hurt your games sales in the short term, and i dont think he did fair by Aterdux.
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2013
- Messages
- 131