Witcher 3 - Killing Monsters Cinematic Trailer

Works for me GBG :)
 
Joined
Jan 10, 2008
Messages
4,721
…and we all know that Geralt has an ulterior affinity to women.

Which haven't stopped him from killing few of them...
 
Joined
Jan 10, 2008
Messages
4,721
You have to assume that she was guilty. Otherwise there would be no ambiguity. Have you also noticed that the last man alive wasn't hanged? Geralt left him standing on some sort of support for a woman to decide his fate.

So substracting a guilty person from a justified execution of the law is morally ambiguous?

Anything goes to fake an unambiguous moral situation. The situation itself fails to be ambiguously moral. It is all on the will of the viewer to see it as an ambigous moral situation.
 
Joined
Mar 29, 2011
Messages
6,265
Well Geralt made sure they paid him first at least ;)
 
Joined
Oct 18, 2006
Messages
1,877
So substracting a guilty person from a justified execution of the law is morally ambiguous?
Since the words "guilty" and "justified" are ambiguous - yes it is.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jan 10, 2008
Messages
4,721
Back
Top Bottom