Lol, the GameBeat guy was expecting a life changing game, so he punished the game for not being a life changing game. He wanted to be able to talk with everyone, enter all buildings, etc.
TheVerge, Polygon and Kotaku were predictable: they're all about their political agenda: transgender, crunch, racial stereotypes…
GameSpot too (I think the guy that did the 16 hour preview would be more suited to do the review, not this reviewer, who didn't find the meaning of life at the end of the game).
But most reviews agree on one thing: it's a buggy game. And I doubt most of it will be patched on day one. But even then, we have to consider that one reviewer noticed that most fixes on the patch they received late, were only felt when he started a new game. I bet most reviewers didn't start a new game, with the review embargo date so close.
Anyway, I still remember how I played Bethesda's Daggerfall, with the game crashing every couple minutes and low framerates (my fault too, as my PC then barely met minimum requirements, a 486 66Hz) but that didn't stop me from enjoying a (then) new experience. But I was very young, >I was even impressed by a sound feature (stepsounds changed if you were stepping stone, wood, leaves, snow…). I hope I'll have the patience now. Because after so much hype, there's no way I'll willingly wait more months to play a more polished Cyberpunk!